Everything SpamChk
does can be done with SA rules, AFAIK (not that those
rules have been precisely reproduced as yet).
I swear we haven't tried to copy anything from the SA rules.
If there is something similar then because both their and our research has
identified the same good
However I hope to see SURBL soon as an additional Declude test.
I just got caught up on this thread and checked out the website for SURBL
and I agree! This would help with the stuff that passes all of the other
tests.
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler, Sr. SysAdminhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten
However I hope to see SURBL soon as an additional Declude test.
I just got caught up on this thread and checked out the website for SURBL
and I agree! This would help with the stuff that passes all of the other
tests.
Sheldon
Hi,
SURBL is surprisingly effective, considering the fact that it
Me too :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org
I would be interested in your script until native support is added
Definitely interested in those scripts!
Cris Porter
JVC America
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger Eriksson
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org
However I hope to see
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Eriksson
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org
However I hope to see SURBL soon as an additional Declude test.
I just got caught up on this thread and checked out
If anyone is interested, I can make the SURBL script available for
download (together with some other scripts, e.g., the log analysis
and test check scripts that generated the results seen above). The
best solution is of course to have the SURBL test implemented
directly in Declude,
] Surbl.org
Me too :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org
I would be interested in your script until
OK, just give me some time to add comments to the scripts. I will
post a download link tomorrow or so.
/Roger
If anyone is interested, I can make the SURBL script available for
download (together with some other scripts, e.g., the log analysis
and test check scripts that generated the
ditto, count me in
- Original Message -
From: ISPHuset Nordic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org
And me too :-)
Just an idea... If you ask Scott im sure he will make a link on the
webpage
OK, just give me some time to add comments to the scripts. I will
post a download link tomorrow or so.
Very cool Roger!!!
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler, Sr. SysAdminhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications 360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!
Yes, your 8 minute update timeframe has passed. ;)
Jason
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Hi Scott -
Since there does seem to be demand, and since you've indicated that you'll
consider this test, perhaps you can give us an estimate of when we might see
you integrate it?
I'm sure you have nothing else to do: the integration of your new web site
is done, you've new ownership and
Since there does seem to be demand, and since you've indicated that you'll
consider this test, perhaps you can give us an estimate of when we might see
you integrate it?
It is very hard to say right now, because of the change in ownership. This
would not be a small new feature that could be
Thanks for the offer, Roger
I've noticed that spammers rarely obscure the links, so this simple test
should work really well!
- Original Message -
From: Roger Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
I responded on the IMGate list, as well. We have been running if for a few
days on our SA gateways, and it has been working great, flagging lots of
spam.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 8:37 PM
Subject:
Any chance this can be made to work with Declude?
Well, SpamAssassin can. :)
Another innocent plug...
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpamAssassin
] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:05 PM
To: Jason
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org
Any chance this can be made to work with Declude?
Well, SpamAssassin can. :)
Another innocent plug...
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org
Innocent? ;). We are already using spamchk as an external test. I
would like to avoid adding spamassassin as well. I was thinking more
along the lines of integrating the test into the declude core...
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
19 matches
Mail list logo
