Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS

2003-12-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
what we need is %TESTWITHWEIGHT% intead of %TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS% so it will list test like ipnotinmx when they pass, and contribute to the total weight, instead of when they fail. you said i was coming in the next release, did you mean %TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS% ? Correct. The problem with

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS

2003-12-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have tried this and it did not work. I already have IPNOTINMX and NOLEGITCONTENT set up for this and they are not appearing in the TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS variable. I added my weight test to it and they still appear. It is formatted as follows in my global.cfg HIDETESTS IPNOTINMX

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS

2003-12-08 Thread Daniel Grotjan
Yes, I'm running 1.77 beta. The exact line from my global.cfg is... HIDETESTS IPNOTINMX NOLEGITCONTENT K-SPAM-ALL K-SPAM-VHIGH K-SPAM-HIGH K-SPAM-MED K-SPAM-LOW The K-SPAM- test are weight test for my Webmail junkmail filter I created. I use Imail rules for customers to choose to send mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS

2003-12-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
Yes, I'm running 1.77 beta. The exact line from my global.cfg is... HIDETESTS IPNOTINMX NOLEGITCONTENT K-SPAM-ALL K-SPAM-VHIGH K-SPAM-HIGH K-SPAM-MED K-SPAM-LOW The K-SPAM- test are weight test for my Webmail junkmail filter I created. I use Imail rules for customers to choose to send mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS

2003-12-08 Thread Serge
It may be confusing for some. but why not add a second variable and leave to the administrator the choice of using it or not. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS

2003-12-07 Thread Matthew Bramble
Use the HIDETESTS option to remove the weight-based tests from your output. I believe it is used in the Global.cfg as follows: HIDETESTS WEIGHT10 HIDETESTS WEIGHT20 Of course Scott might also want to change the way that weight-based tests are reported, but this will remove some of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS

2003-12-07 Thread serge
- From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:46 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS Use the HIDETESTS option to remove the weight-based tests from your output. I believe it is used in the Global.cfg as follows

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS

2003-12-07 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
, 2003 4:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS Use the HIDETESTS option to remove the weight-based tests from your output. I believe it is used in the Global.cfg as follows: HIDETESTS WEIGHT10 HIDETESTS WEIGHT20 Of course Scott might

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS

2003-12-07 Thread Daniel Grotjan
I have tried this and it did not work. I already have IPNOTINMX and NOLEGITCONTENT set up for this and they are not appearing in the TESTFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS variable. I added my weight test to it and they still appear. It is formatted as follows in my global.cfg HIDETESTS IPNOTINMX