Kami,
I turned SKIPIFWEIGHT off for this version of the test and found that
it scored over 40% of my spam. With SKIPIFWEIGHT on, it scores around
3% to of the spam (stuff that would have been held or hadn't yet
reached a hold weight). Because this hits only combinations of tests,
you are much
: [Declude.JunkMail] Zombie
Test
Kami,I turned SKIPIFWEIGHT off for this version of the test
and found that it scored over 40% of my spam. With SKIPIFWEIGHT on, it
scores around 3% to of the spam (stuff that would have been held or hadn't yet
reached a hold weight). Because this hits only combinations
Scott: Any chance for adding a skip test if the weight is below a certain
negative number.
That is something that we will be looking into.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 7:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Zombie Test
Matt:
What I like about Scott's new
feature (not his own
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 12:08 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Zombie
Test
Kami, I am not sure how
good that would be. The whole reason of giving negative weights is to counter
balance possible failures on other tests
