|
Thanks I will heed that advice
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet & Computer Services
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222
Did not notice the
post I was responding to was sent to 2 lists. It is always best not to send a
post to 2 lists at the same time. Create separate posts.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, October 04,
2005 11:07
AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] [Declude.JunkMail]
3.05.5 issues
Work on one thing
at a time.
Leave Sniffer in
persistent mode and work on the threads.
You have it at 15
now, and things are backing up. Turn it up to say 25 and see what
happens.
Also, are you
running an heavy resource filters such as body filters?
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, October 04,
2005 10:45
AM
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Cc: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] [Declude.JunkMail]
3.05.5 issues
I have got it down to
15 and tried to set sniffer back to persistent mode again
However I find that
with sniffer in persistent mode as David suggested, the proc directory starts
back logging. which means the system is not keeping up with the flow of
mail. Within 20 minutes I had 1400 files in the proc directory. I
stopped the sniffer service and now it is gradually catching
up.
Any more suggestions
as to what can get tuned?
I appreciate the
assistance
Thank
you
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet & Computer
Services
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener,
ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, October
04, 2005 1:06
PM
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.05.5
issues
Trial and error
is best. Set it to some thing like 20 and watch what
happens.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
Vanderzand
Sent:
Tuesday, October 04,
2005 9:27
AM
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.05.5
issues
thank
you
I was under the
understanding given me by David from Declude that it was appropriate given
the amount of power my hardware has.
What would you
recommend for my hardware?
Thanks John, I
always appreciate your active involvement in the list
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet & Computer
Services
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener,
ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(Lists)
Sent:
Tuesday, October 04,
2005 12:11 PM
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
3.05.5 issues
Your threads is
way too high, and I suspect that there are time outs occurring and not all
scanning is being done.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
Vanderzand
Sent:
Tuesday, October 04,
2005 6:17
AM
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.05.5
issues
I find that since
being on the new version that more spam is slipping through. We have
imail v8.05, declude and sniffer on win 2000 server dual xeon 3.4Ghz with
2Gb ram. Threads are set to 50 with no other setting in
declude.cfg
Any advice you
can give me to tighten it to where we had it before? I have had
several clients complaining
Other than
changing from V2.06.16 to 3.05 nothing else has changed on the
server
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet & Computer Services
11 Belmont Ave.
W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222
|
