[Declude.JunkMail] IPBlacklist CIDR Question

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Scott, When JunkMail does a CIDR calculation from an entry in ipblacklist.txt file does it use the actual value of the IP address that is listed or does it calculate what it believes to be the correct range of addresses? For example, how would the following entry be interpreted?

[Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Enhancement

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Scott, I find that HiJack catches a meaningful amount of SPAM for the store and forward domains and probably also helps out on Dictionary Attacks as well. It seems like some spammers deliberately target secondary MX's with the thought that they can sneak stuff through more easily. It appears

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] IPBlacklist CIDR Question

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 9:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IPBlacklist CIDR Question When JunkMail does a CIDR calculation from an entry in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Enhancement

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Thanks again Scott. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Enhancement I find that HiJack catches a meaningful amount of SPAM

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Hi Scott, Nothing like a quiet Sunday morning to get the questions going. I have a filter question and will use the following header to explain. The e-mail is being handled correctly by JunkMail according to the GLOBAL.CFG settings I would like to be able to filter on the domain names of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question

2003-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I would like to be able to filter on the domain names of mailservers in the chain. In this case I would like to have an entry such as WHATEVER CONTAINS .aebolts.com (Where WHATEVER is a valid filter screening criteria for the mailservers in the chain). I know I can use HEADER for this but is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Scott, OK. I'll leave you alone for the rest of today G. BTW, HiJack has trapped over 500 pieces of SPAM this weekend for 2 domains whose Primary MX's have been up and running the entire time. JunkMail got another 400+ for 1 of those domains. Just shows how the spammers are going after the

[Declude.JunkMail] IP Black List

2003-02-02 Thread David Barrett
I have been trying to get the IP Black list file to function properly. Below are the settings I am using.. GLOBAL.CFG IPFILE fromfile d:\imail\declude\ipblacklist.txt x 20 0 DEFAULT.JUNKMAIL IPFILEHOLD I added my IP address to the IPFile and sent a test message with no luck except my

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IP Black List

2003-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have been trying to get the IP Black list file to function properly. Below are the settings I am using.. GLOBAL.CFG IPFILE fromfile d:\imail\declude\ipblacklist.txt x 20 0 The fromfile test type is only for return addresses (E-mail addresses), not IP addresses. If you change it to:

[Declude.JunkMail] Reject Msg based on Size

2003-02-02 Thread Roger Heath
Scott, I just had an MIT engineer/user suggest a feature to reject messages based on their size. I found this fascinating personally. You could look at the size and bounce, e.g. SIZE 10MB BOUNCE Might be a server saver also... especially if it bounced a partial response smaller message.