[Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations

2008-05-28 Thread Scott Fosseen
I believe I have seen some replies to this already, but I though I would put this out again. I am hosting about 30 domains worth of email and filtering for an additional 10 domains. My current configuration is all mail is pre-filtered through a Barracuda 400 box, then forwarded to a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations

2008-05-28 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
I use Alligate from Solid Oak Software, and I like it a lot. On my primary gateway, I received just shy of 500,000 connections in the last 24 hours, and my Declude only had to see 4% of that traffic. Yes, 4%. I'm spending less time doing clever things in Declude, because Alligate is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations

2008-05-28 Thread Matt
Scott, Alligate is a good gateway to use when you have something like Declude behind it. The only reason that I can think of that your Barracuda box is seeing that many messages would be because you might not be validating addresses. Like Andrew said, you can cut your _connection_ traffic

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations

2008-05-28 Thread Daniel Slentz
I concur with Andrew, Alligate saved our company a ton of money in upgrades to our mail server. Our mail server CPU's were peaked 24x7. When I inserted Alligate into the mix, CPU's peak at about 30-40% now. I highly recommend it. ~Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations

2008-05-28 Thread Harry vanderzand
Same experience here Harry Vanderzand NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008 Intown Internet 117 Ruskview Road Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1 519-741-1222 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Slentz Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 5:48 PM To: