In absentia...
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17162.html
This made a lot of sense before, and it was the only way to disable DUL
tests for local users prior to IMail 8 and JunkMail ~1.76. Declude
won't disable the tests for gatewayed domains, only where an address
matches
Title: Message
Thanks
- ouch.
I'd
say that's a bug in design.
Since
AUTH is supported in Imail 8 and since others may not allow local users to send
through their Imail server (my outbound is going through IIS SMTP with SMTP
AUTH), there should be AT LEAST a config option to turn this
Andy,
It's only been a matter of months since a realistic work around was
available for most users (using WHITELIST AUTH). To the best of my
knowledge, I'm the only one of us that has said anything about it on
this list (first time in March, but of course I could be wrong). Like
I indicated
Title: Message
Can anyone tell me how f-prot compares to
mcafee or symantec when it comes to keeping their database up with new viruses?
That just seems pretty cheap but hey that's exactly what I'm looking for as long
as it works well :)
thanks,
Larry
Craddock
Title: Message
Larry:
We have used it for years and are very happy with it.
Of course since it is cheap I suggest you use the savings and add another
scanner to your arsenal. 2 is always better than 1.
We use AVG and FProt together.
Regards,
Kami
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
Just was curious, did you happen to notice how much extra
overhead was added to the CPU when another virus scanner was added to the
system. With only 8000-1 message a day for our server, it's not the
newest nor fastest thing out there.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This wasn't a bug or a larger issue of Declude trust based upon the
'from Address.' There was no choice but to skip DUL/DYNA/DUHL tests
(which were the only ones skipped) when the 'from address' was spoofed
as a local address. Imail 8 and WHITELIST AUTH help, but they don't
solve this issue,
Imail 8 can still be configured where the Client is NOT required to
Auth in order to send. One example of that is 'Relay for Addresses.'
If you use 'Relay for Addresses.', you can easily list the same adresses in
JunkMail.
This is the equivalent of whitelist auth
- Original Message -
So, if we have IPs on a DUL/DYNA/DUHL list, are using anything but 'No
Mail Relay' in Imail 8 and we run a DYNA/DUL/DUHL test on the first hop, we
will definitely tag our own customers.
Only if you are not using Imail 8 with AUTH and only if you are using Imail
for outbound mail relaying.
Title: Message
Seems
to be pretty good. we have been using it for about 6 months now. We also use NAV
CE for the rest of the machine and just exclude the spool dir along with the
mailboxes.
Rick
B
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Then, in either cases, scanning the first hop is a simple matter of
changing the test name to eliminate the reserved string of DUL, DYNA or DUHL
and using the hack which Matt found.
NO - removing DUL/DYNA/DUHL is NOT an option. Because MUCH of the private
emails originate from some address
I did some benchmarking a few months ago and F-Prot was faster than
everything else, and in many cases 4 times faster or more. You need to
make sure that you use the 32-bit executable fpcmd.exe otherwise you
will take a performance hit from the 16-bit operation of F-Prot.exe.
Matt
Jeff
Andy,
I think there might be some confusion here. If you change the test
names and use the %IP4R%/dnsbl trick, it will always test the first hop
regardless of what the Mail From is, unless of course you are
whitelisting the sender.
You don't have to remove the tests, you just have to rename
Title: Message
I will ditto this. I used the 16 bit
trend command line application, and was having trouble keeping up with 15-20k
messages a day. I switched to F-prots 32-bit command line scanner
and I dont even see it pop up in the task manager it moves so
quick. Very big improvement,
14 matches
Mail list logo
