I have had a continuing problem with Hijack. I have several business
customers with 25 plus work stations, these customers are getting caught in
hijack on outgoing mails. I have added ALLOWIP entries for all the customers
with no success. It seems as though declude reads hijack cfg for a certain
This all began when I moved Declude from one server to another to perform
some needed repairs. The version of Declude on my primary says 1.78 however,
when I copied the delude.exe (1.78) to the secondary and looked at the
version number it now says (1.75). I looked in the manual and I see a
On 22 Jun 2004 at 7:07, Jeffrey M Donley wrote:
Hi Jeff,
So in your hijack.cfg file you have ALLOWIP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and in
the HOLDx dir hijack is retaining emails from the allowip addresses?
If that is the case I suggest stopping and restarting declude console
to reset hijack; if that
Hi,I want to score sniffer higher in my
Declude points but I don't want to score all sniffer results equal. There is an
experimental group as well as a grey group which I would like to score at the
level I have it now, where I mark the subject.
Do I need to define all sniffer external
List,
Is it possible to have junkmail log a separate X-RBL-Warning: xxx line
for each triggered phrase in a given filter file? It's default behavior
appears to include the line # for the last phrase that was triggered for
a given filter test, and to give the cumulative total weight of all
I need to give a negative weight to a range of IP addresses. (actually 5
class C networks) Can I use an IP Blacklist with a negative weight using
the test type ipfile?
Bill Green
dfn Systems
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
I have had a continuing problem with Hijack. I have several business
customers with 25 plus work stations, these customers are getting caught in
hijack on outgoing mails. I have added ALLOWIP entries for all the customers
with no success. It seems as though declude reads hijack cfg for a certain
In this case a message failing GREY or EXPERIMENTAL will
receive 10 + 15 = 25 points and all other result codes will receive 15
points
Remove the GREY and EXPERIMENTAL definitions, add all other
result codes with a weight of 5 and assign 10 points to the SNIFFER nonzero
line.
So GREY and
dfn Systems wrote:
I need to give a negative weight to a range of IP addresses. (actually 5
class C networks) Can I use an IP Blacklist with a negative weight using
the test type ipfile?
That's how I do it:
GOODIPipfile C:\IMail\Declude\GOODIP.TXT x -25 0
--
Is it possible to have junkmail log a separate X-RBL-Warning: xxx line
for each triggered phrase in a given filter file? It's default behavior
appears to include the line # for the last phrase that was triggered for
a given filter test, and to give the cumulative total weight of all
triggered
Thanks for the reply Scott - I could see where a separate line for each
would be a problem.
Since the X-RBL-Warning: xxx displays the cumlative weight for a
particular test anyways, do you think giving the line numbers for each
matched phrase in a comma separated list rather then the line number
Couldn't find this in the archives. I'm noticing that Delog apparently has problems
reading my
Declude logs now that there have been format changes. I thought of using
search/replace in a good
text editor to make my logs readable, but I wonder if there's a specific syntax Delog
expects?
Keith
Can anyone with SpamAssasin
plugged into declude give me their global.cfg excerpt?
I hold on 15, I am unsure on the cw
and sw weight.
Also, how do you weigh this test compared to your hold weight?
SPAMASSASSIN
external nonzero
c:\imail\declude\spamc32.exe -cw %WEIGHT% -sw 10 -f
Since the X-RBL-Warning: xxx displays the cumlative weight for a
particular test anyways, do you think giving the line numbers for each
matched phrase in a comma separated list rather then the line number for
the last phrase would bloat the headers too much?
X-RBL-Warning: filterMiscBody: Message
Not much new...but interesting anyways.
http://corp.aol.com/press/ASTA_Statement_of_Intent.pdf
Andy Ognenoff
Online Systems Administrator
Direct: (262)250-2860
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Cousins Submarines, Inc.
http://www.cousinssubs.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned
Is there a way to check / count the number of html features in an email with
Declude, much like Imail Anti-spam does?
Thanks
Jay
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
Not much new...but interesting anyways.
http://corp.aol.com/press/ASTA_Statement_of_Intent.pdf
Andy Ognenoff
The comments about using the standard Mail Submission Port, port 587, were
news to me.
Can Imail be configured to listen on port 25 and port 587?
Can I configure my firewall
That would be sweet. Declude rocks!
Steve
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tue 6/22/2004 5:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Logging behavior w/ WARN action
Since the X-RBL-Warning: xxx displays the
Is there a way to check / count the number of html features in an email with
Declude, much like Imail Anti-spam does?
No, Declude JunkMail does not attempt to analyze the content of HTML
E-mails. With filters, though, you could detect a number of different HTML
structures.
I hold on 15, I am unsure on the cw and sw weight.
You can't change the current weight; that syntax ('-cw %WEIGHT%') is
just the way you pass the current weight at the time the test is run.
The skip weight is used to reduce processing. The maximum, and
traditional, skip weight
Question about the FIND command. Is this possible?
I have a file that I would like to remove some lines which have unique
texts. Lets say PhraseA, PhraseB and PhraseC
I know that I could do
Find /V PhraseA orig.txt temp1.txt
Find /V PhraseB temp1.txt temp2.txt
Find /V PhraseC temp2.txt
21 matches
Mail list logo
