RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] spf breaks email forwarding -

2006-03-08 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thanks, Sandy. I liked this approach for a couple of reasons; off the top of my head: 1) I was sure that Declude locks the Q*.SMD file (if for no other reason than to stop Imail from poaching them) and possibly the D*.SMD file so I thought an external test wouldn't be able to redirect them. 2)

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B7BC7-18FF] Declude not inserting headers and Marking

2006-03-08 Thread Craig Edmonds
Hi Sandy, Where can I find some information about the MS SMTP for email addresss validation? What is it exactly? Kindest Regards Craig Edmonds 123 Marbella Internet W: www.123marbella.com E : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spf breaks email forwarding -

2006-03-08 Thread Nick Hayer
Wow thanks for the efforts here Andrew - Nice work! -Nick Colbeck, Andrew wrote: Hey, Nick. I spent some timepoking at this with a stick. Since I just use IMail as a gateway so that I can use Declude... I've had no use for IMail mailboxes or forwarding, so it was all

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spf breaks email forwarding -

2006-03-08 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Sandy Sanford Whiteman wrote: Andrew, I like your workaround with the Program Alias. However, I think that instead, if people are willing to wait a few weeks to a month, I can find time to put out a full-fledged external test for Declude that does much the same thing,

[Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I got a laugh when I saw this RDNS. ip-66-234-163-182.static.dialup.wireweb.net A dedicated IP on a dial up. Are we going backwards? Kevin Bilbee Network Administrator Standard Abrasives, Inc. Changing the way industry works. --- This E-mail came from the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread Dave Doherty
That used to be pretty common. I gatewayed for a customer who had an internal mail system years before the Internet. When the vendor came out with an SMTP connector, we put it on a static dialup and set it to check the mail a couple of times a day. How things have changed! Now if I just

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
There may be any number of reasons why a static IP is useful on a dial-up. I have several customers who have a penchant for sending mass-forwards of jokes and other debris. If one of them gets caught by HiJack, it may be several hours until I have an opportunity to check the mail server, and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
We offer businesses that require it a static IP for dialup; in many cases, especially in rural areas, dialup is the only affordable means a business can obtain for Internet. Randy A. GlobalWeb.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I have not seen a static dialup in about 4 years. I am amazed that they are still in use. After reading the posts I can see valid reasons for tracking, rural areas, and backup connections. It just supprised me since I have not seen one in such a long time. Kevin Bilbee -Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
In the corporate world, it was certainly handy to keep user and workstation name mappings consistent when we used WINS and the WINS timeout was far longer than the duration of a dialup session. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread Will
We still have one customer with a dual analog router out in the middle of nowhere that we route a /29 subnet to. He has his wife strip on web cam for money... or so he claims. I guess goat farming wasn't enough. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread Andy Schmidt
Any group discounts for Declude customers? G -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 03:36 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS We still have one customer with a dual

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
snip He has his wife strip on web cam for money... or so he claims. I guess goat farming wasn't enough. There's probably good money in combining the two. Best not to inquire. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will

[Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail's Junk folder- ARGH!

2006-03-08 Thread Marc Catuogno
Anyone know how to get my domain out of hotmail's Junk filtering? --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS

2006-03-08 Thread Andy Schmidt
Declude Video Suite ? (to keep the naming consistent) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 04:02 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Funny RDNS snip He has his

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail's Junk folder- ARGH!

2006-03-08 Thread Matt
http://postmaster.msn.com/cgi-bin/dasp/postmaster.asp?ContextNav=TShooting#doc Their process is listed in that page. Due to your issues, it might be wise to pay the extortion fee charged by Bonded Sender since providers like Hotmail do honor Bonded Sender. Matt Marc Catuogno wrote:

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B7BC7-18FF] Declude not inserting headers and Marking

2006-03-08 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Where can I find some information about the MS SMTP for email addresss validation? What is it exactly? 5XXSINK, at http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/5xxsink/download/release is a free plug-in for MS SMTP that allows it to do recipient validation