RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Over Hold Weight, but Delivered

2006-07-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Note, if this is related to Hijack, there either there is a new bug in Hijack or there is a misconfiguration somewhere, as Hijack only checks outbound messages. NOTE: If you are doing gateway service rather than using aliases, you can be caught by this. Another reason that gateway service (Store

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Over Hold Weight, but Delivered

2006-07-15 Thread Don Brown
We've had Hijack shut-down for about 24 hours and we are still seeing mail delivery with scores well over our hold weight. Friday, July 14, 2006, 8:37:38 AM, IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ISEKD I've been seeing it too. I finally tracked it down to Hi-Jack. Disable

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Over Hold Weight, but Delivered

2006-07-15 Thread Don Brown
Turning-off Hijack had no affect. The issue continued. Are you referring to the Forward field, just below the reply-to field of the User's record in Imail? Are you saying that using that field, (instead of setting up an Alias record, instead) will somehow let mail through, when it is over the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] F-Prot Licensing

2006-07-15 Thread Don Brown
Let us know what you find, please. Friday, July 14, 2006, 5:48:25 PM, Heimir Eidskrem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HE Markus Gufler wrote: This pricing is just another way of saying Go Away. Suggestions? Markus --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] F-Prot Licensing

2006-07-15 Thread Don Brown
All of these folks must think that the ISP business is high margin and we're just looking for ways to reduce taxes by paying all of these exorbitant fees. A mind is such a terrible thing to waste . . . Friday, July 14, 2006, 8:59:38 PM, John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JTL JTL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Over Hold Weight, but Delivered

2006-07-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
We've had Hijack shut-down for about 24 hours and we are still seeing mail delivery with scores well over our hold weight. Time to put the JunkMail log into DEBUG mode, run it until you know the problem has occurred, put it back into what ever log mode you desire, then copy out all the lines

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Over Hold Weight, but Delivered

2006-07-15 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Turning-off Hijack had no affect. The issue continued. OK, as I suspected, the issue has nothing to do with Hijack. Are you referring to the Forward field, just below the reply-to field of the User's record in Imail? Are you saying that using that field, (instead of setting up an Alias