My mail server is running on Windows XP Pro.
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More info on Imail Webmail Problem
He means the server. What server OS are you
Use 8080 and get your server off xp proOn 9/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi All:Running Imail 8.14. Having a problem with the Imail Webmail service. All of a sudden it stopped working. It looks like it's running and there are no strange entries in the log. It's been running on
Ugh... move it to a server OS. Windows 2000 or 2003. While I don't believe
Windows 2003 to be as stable as Windows 2000, it will be easier for you to
manage and secure, so I'd go with that.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Linda Pagillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Darin,
2 cents here. I have had very, very few issues that may have been
related to Windows 2003, and some of my servers get pounded on. It is
the most stable platform that I have used to date, and it is definitely
more secure by default than 2k. YMMV of course.
Matt
Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Matt,
All of my servers are 2003, but I have had seen
some small stability issues with 2003 where I didn't with fully patched
2000. Also, I'm see 10-20% higher average CPU on 2003 with all other
software the same. I'm also seeing issues with IMail and Declude on 2003
that I did not see
All of my servers are 2003, but I have had seen some small stability
issues with 2003 where I didn't with fully patched 2000. Also, I'm see
10-20% higher average CPU on 2003 with all other software the same.
I agree that I have also seen a CPU jump with 2003 - but I suspect its
partly
The KB is finally published regarding the corrupted files issue Andy and
others ran into with MS06-49.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925308/
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude
I have no doubts about YMMV, but for the benefit of the discussion, I
could add a little. When I moved IMail/Declude from 2000 to 2003
temporarily as part of disaster recovery, I was able to benchmark the
difference in CPU on an exactly identical system except for the RAID
card (went from an
Interesting. In my case, the hardware was
identical. However, I have not done much in terms of tweaking 2003, and
still have DEP on. The previous 2000 was pretty well optimized for
performance. So I probably shouldn't compare until I optimize
2003.
Darin.
- Original Message -
Main things I'm seeing with IMail/Declude on 2003 are
1. Messages that get corrupted by putting the headers in the body during
processing by Declude (1.82), and then a new set gets put in halfway through
the process. The message ends up with half of the tests displayed in the
body and the other
10 matches
Mail list logo
