Dave,
Pete has helped me figure out that your XML samples, e.g.:
http://interim.declude.com/41048/Scanners/SNF/snf_engine.xml
is NOT a valid XML file.
Specifically, the closing tag for the node element is invalid.
It MUST be:
/node
(Currently it is
Yes you are correct this was reported to us . The file should have been
updated with this release. I will ensure this is resolved. To correct this.
In the snf_engine.xml change node/ To /node
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, May
Just a thought. We would have to test it but do you think the same thing
could be achieved using:
IPREPUTATION-3 SNFIPREP x -3 0 -5
IPREPUTATION-2 SNFIPREP x -2 0 -5
IPREPUTATION-1 SNFIPREP x -1 0 -5
IPREPUTATION-0SNFIPREP x 0 5 -5
IPREPUTATION+1
Hi Dave,
Hm - yes,I think if you added 21 lines (from -10 to 0 and to +10) to the
config file, you would have could cover the reputation range from -1 to +1
in 0.1 step increments.
Not elegant - but would have the same effect as multiplying the reputation
range with the defined max weight.
On 5/5/2010 1:30 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Dave,
Hm
yes,I think if you
added 21 lines (from -10 to 0 and to +10) to the config file, you would
have could
cover the reputation range from -1 to +1 in 0.1 step increments.
Not
elegant but would
have the same effect as
Hi Dave (just in case this got overlooked - or I missed the answer),
Also even though there are multiple entries the test only runs once and
the resulted exit code is the triggered.
I know that all 18 SNF rule lines only require one invocation of Sniffer -
which are then evaluated 18
Yes, Declude already has TWO weights associated with SNFIPREP (one for
positive, one for negative).
Just as you said, but multiplying with the positive or negative weight, as
need be, one would get two linear slopes from the center point.
On top of that, Dave has a basepoint option that
Title: Release 4.10.42
On 5/5/2010 3:24 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi
Dave
(just in case this got overlooked or I missed the
answer),
Also even though
there are multiple entries the test only runs once and the resulted
exit code
is the triggered.
I
know that all 18
Thanks Pete.
Hopefully these discussions (and seeing your responsiveness) will convince
more folks decide to give Sniffer a try!
I'm not completely sure what you are asking
The golden rule for external tests and for RBLs is - if you have multiple
lines using the SAME command (e.g.,
Title: Release 4.10.42
On 5/5/2010 4:05 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
snip/
The
golden rule for external tests and for RBLs is if
you have multiple lines using the SAME command
(e.g., the 18 SNF lines), or referring to the same external
program (e.g., 5 invURIBL lines), or
10 matches
Mail list logo
