Even replacing the To: %ALLRECIPS% with To: postmaster@%RECIPHOST% will
only affect the headers.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
.
It seems to work (though I need to do more testing), but is this the best
way to accomplish this? We plan to implement filtering only for our domain
at first, and add other domains as requested.
TIA,
David
http://www.orcsweb.com/
Powerful Web Hosting Solutions
#1 in Service and Support
Thanks Scott. I thought maybe I'd missed something, like
default.junkmail=off :))
David
http://www.orcsweb.com/
Powerful Web Hosting Solutions
#1 in Service and Support
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8
Scott, thanks for the quick response. I apologize for being dense, but this
only happens when the recipients' mail is hosted on our mail server, yes?
Regardless of whether it originated on our mail server or not?
Thanks again,
David
http://www.orcsweb.com/
Powerful Web Hosting Solutions
#1
to you,
so there will only be one recipient on your server.
-Scott
Got it - thanks again.
David
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E
(with the default.JunkMail file of course); I didn't create
directories for those not being scanned. Seems to work fine this way.
David
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came
Is there something wrong with this Message-Id: header, or is this failing
for some other reason? We also get a lot of BADHEADERS failures on email we
programmatically generate - what typically causes these?
TIA,
David
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail
generate - what typically causes these?
Never mind, I found the badheader lookup link on www.declude.com. Sorry
to have bothered everyone :))
Thanks,
David
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com
Actually, I prefer that it run the test and then whitelist.
snip
Chuck Schick
I agree - I'd like to be able to see if problems are actually corrected
before I de-whitelist, if there is such a word ;))
Thanks,
David
http://www.orcsweb.com/
Powerful Web Hosting Solutions
#1 in Service
need to accomplish. I believe it will delete in all
their messages older than the number of days, and not just those in their
Inbox - I'm not sure - but if the start directory is the path to the
individual user's folder it will only delete that user's mail.
HTH
David
http://www.orcsweb.com
Oh indeed it will, however also the following examples will be whitelisted
by the same statement:
Myexample.net
Yourexample.net
Herexample.net
Hisexample.net
Anyexample.net
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Duncan
Sent: Thursday, 29 May, 2003 18:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
to refer to
this but is there a test in JunkMail that tests for this?
Thanks,
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
noticed this? Spammers sending junkmail to secondary MX's?
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2003 00:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering Headers
I have a file
of RFC821 4.3.
macombisd.org claims to be host
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=macombisd.org+
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges
of the email parts (HELO,
HEADERS etc...) for I am not sure what each part entails for example: Is
HELO a subset of HEADERS?
Thanks all,
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
X-Outbound Test-Failures: IPNOTINMX, FILTER-WHITE
X-Outbound Test-Weight: -30
X-Note: Intended recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Sent from mail.moragg.com ([62.219.165.29]).
X-Note: This E-mail has been scanned for spam and viruses.
X-Note: Please send abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filter the body and header for .naturalherbal.biz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stanley Lyzak
Sent: Tuesday, 16 September, 2003 15:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] What do I do about this?
I have to admin, the level
not really ever seeing it utilized. Any suggestions?
David
David,
Here
is the DNS workaround for win2003 servers. Basically win2003 increased
the packet size to larger than 512k when performing a DNS query. This is
a default setting in win2003. The problem is many firewalls still dont
allow packets larger than 512k. Here is a link
, envfromstrict, base64, etc.
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Order in which tests are run
Follow-up please.
Where do IPFILE
the .xhdr file once it has been used!
Thanks,
David
I agree that this would be easiest to accomplish with a hook from Declude to
add the header info. Scott or Barry do you know if this can be done in the
current version? If not it would be a great feature request.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
first AV
catches the email. We are using f-prot and mcafee. Thanks again
-David
I'd willing swap a pile of snow for our weather which can only be described as
damp, all day every day except for a couple of days in August.
David, Wales.
-- Original Message --
From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
is this a combination of both programs?
Anything that would help speed this up, something I should change from
the default settings?
David Dodell
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
run an ISP, so there are only a few mailboxs here getting
incoming mail ... most of my traffic is listserver based, and alot of
the spam is blocked there because they aren't authorized posters g
David
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
If you are running v1.22 or earlier, the biggest speed boost would be to
upgrade to 1.26a. In 1.23, we changed the code so that most DNS tests
would be run in parallel (at the same time). Previously, Declude would
wait for one DNS query to come back before it would start another one.
As
tests have to be failed to consider
it spam?
David
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web
site at http
[EMAIL PROTECTED]NRCPT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]R[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
David Barrett
Maine Connect,
Inc.
Networksolutions it
gets marked with BadWhois
X-RBL-Warning: Inaccurate or missing WHOIS
data
Is the whois tracking important enough to be
concerned with?
David Barrett
Maine Connect, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott
I tried adding CC %ALLRECIPS% to the BANEXT email template hoping to have a
copy go to the recipient as well. Is it possible??
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL
Scott
Thanks.
Get some sleep. ;)
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist NOT honored
I tried adding CC %ALLRECIPS
the mail will have
no message body. I didn't try it to see what part of it failed, how many and
what statements make it fail but it is a problem.
David Stavert
Netraprise Systems, Inc.
79 13th Ave NE, Suite 112
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612.317.9065
612.317.9062 FAX
XINHEADER X-Note
2516]
The only difference was replacing 1.33 with 1.32 and restarting SMTP
David
DECLUDE.GP1
Description: Binary data
DECLUDE.GP2
Description: Binary data
In future you might want to assume you are wrong BEFORE you ask the
question. ;)
David
As usual when I assume something I am wrong :)
Stu
At 02:39 PM 01/16/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Is it a correct assumption that if 4 weight tests are
defined (weight5,
weight10, weight15, weight20
Scott
Just noticed that the manual.htm for junkmail shows
simply rename the \IMail\Declude\junkmail.cfg file to junkmail.bak. in
the Emergency Uninstall section.
David Stavert
Netraprise Systems, Inc.
79 13th Ave NE, Suite 112
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612.317.9065
612.317.9062 FAX
---
[This E
for Secure Services Inc. by Declude JunkMail
(www.declude.com).
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from warpdrive.maineconnect.net.
([208.3.246.244]).
/SNIP
David Barrett
Maine Connect, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
Scott,
In your manual it
reads.
This means that if E-mail isn't delivered directly to your IMail server
(for example, if the MX record for your domain points to a virus scanner, that
then forwards to your IMail server), you
can still use Declude JunkMail!
Does this mean that declude
I was setting up a networkpath path eg. \\123.123.123.123\imail for the log
files. But There was a type-o so I got a runtime error.
Now when I start the program the error persists. I just uninstalled and
reinstalled.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I have the IMail AV software but have not installed it yet. I am running
both Declude AV and JM. I will install it this weekend and test it a bit.
Let you know what I see.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent
That's because they accept mail to those accounts, but apparently they are
just auto-responders, and there is no way to reach them to let them know
about problems.
Ok, how does the tests know that?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
I have been through this s number of times. Savvis will probably just do
recursive queries. As I assume they have large blocks of addresses so the
root number servers point to Savvis which will then hand off the query to
your server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can DSBL be used with Declude yet? If so, what are the configuration
lines?
David
DSBL: Usage
The Distributed Sender Boycott List has two rDNSBL lists, one can have entries added
by anybody while the other only accepts entries by users who are trusted by the DSBL
staff. Since you probably
It appears that DSBL is now three lists ... the two confirmed ones
are:
list.dsbl.org for single-stage relays tested by trusted users, multihop.dsbl.org
I haven't noticed any hits on these with Declude ... are they working?
I'm using the format:
DSBL ip4r list.dsbl.org * 10 0
DSBL
ds 250 ms
Thanks for any help on this..David BarrettMaine Connect,
Inc.Secure Services Inc." I'd rather be a failure at something I
enjoy than be a success at something I hate "-- George
Burns
-
From:
Frederick Samarelli
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:09
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mx server
settings and
Every ip I tested with XBL shows listed. Even non
valid ips.
- Original Message -
From:
David
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:25
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mx server
settings and
I think the have a problem.
- Original Message -
From:
David
Barrett
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
Seeing every one else is curious count me in !!
Dave
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] CIDR listings for china, Korea, Taiwan
?
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network
Scott
If the sendto can be someone other than the recipient it will be perfect. If
the email can go to the postmaster at the domain for instance. In
multidomain or forwarding situations it spreads the load and gives a domain
administrator the ability to fine tune the setup.
David
-Original
I shiver in anticipation
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] v1.47 (beta) released
If the sendto can be someone
for example [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know about setting up the directory, and user as:
\imail\declude\stat.com\mailing.JunkMail
But to prevent any testing, should I just WEIGHT everything as ZERO,
or is there an easier weight to allow everything to pass?
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
Actually, an easier way may be to whitelist them, by adding a line like
this to your global.cfg file:
WHITELIST FROM[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But that would require me to know each individual poster whose ISP is
messed up ...
There isn't something like
WHITELIST TO [EMAIL
Friday, April 26, 2002, 8:12:05 AM, you wrote:
Does this mean that if I send something to a list it will not go out right now?
I hope not... as I need to send something today to 295 users
Eagerly awaiting a fix
I'm running 1.49 (latest incarnation) and haven't seen any problems
with my
Hey Scott,
Does this mean that if a virus sends itself out through a mailing list,
the virus will not be stopped on the way out?
David Roush
Technical Services Director
Diocese of Austin
512-476-1009, ext. 237
512-469-9537, fax
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
That is great Scott.
Thanks,
David Roush
Technical Services Director
Diocese of Austin
512-476-1009, ext. 237
512-469-9537, fax
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
to set up a secondary MX
server so if the primary goes down for maintainance or problems do I need
another declude licence ?
Thanks for any help with these minor
questions...
David BarrettMaine Connect,
Inc.
" I'd rather be a failure at something I enjoy than
be a success at something I
Does anyone have a name for the tool that retrieves mail and then
destributes it to the exchange server. I have used it in the past. I believe
there is one from Australia but there may be others. I just had a use for it
come up today.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Stavert
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude in front of exchange servers.
Does anyone have a name for the tool that retrieves mail and
then destributes
Did find it. Could be useful.
http://www.chimera.co.nz/
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude in front of exchange
Add away.
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List
I'm already doing this. I have a program on the server that runs
Tom
Are you referring to the vacation message in IMail or the out of office
feature in Outlook / Exchange. We use both depending on the client or the
application. It might be as well to use the Program Alias in IMail to
process the email and add the address to the domain rules.
David
messages get through, very easy to understand and administer. Simple as
that. I would LOVE to see it in Junkmail.
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send
and forwarding a
false postive that got caught. Has anyone had any experience with 7.1 and
Declude / Attach??
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
.
-Scott
Thanks,
David
__
David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC.
(904)721-0867
(904)721-1253 fax
http://www.iti-infotech.com (business)
http://www.mahonri.org (personal
Scott
The domain in question is not local. Looking through the Declude logs I find
things
06/14/2002 02:56:50 Qa1c03fd60048eaef ERROR: Could not find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in recip file.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Stavert
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Odd behaviour
Scott
The domain in question is not local. Looking through the Declude logs I find
things
06/14/2002 02:56
I still find it very easy to get the X-RCPT-TO: pick up a chunk of the
$junkmail file as in this header when I use ROUTETO.
Thanks
David
Received: from hotmail.com [216.33.241.15] by mx2.netraprise.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.10) id A7A8A201FE; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 18:39:20 -0500
Received: from
for a certain failed test? For instance, if I
want to WARN and then modify the subject line? One more. Can I run my
server through these same tests to ensure that messages from our servers
are not flagged as SPAM?
Thanks for your help.
David
David Frager
IntelliMark Associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Do you have WHITELISTTO postmaster?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Foulks
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself
What is the HELOBOGUS test? I've not
Scott
Would the WHITELIST nfti.com be cause for this to NOT fail no mater what.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Foulks
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed
in the spam mailbox. I have had trouble
getting my users to check their web messaging regularly for valid
messages, so I found this on the IMAIL kb and set it up with an outlook
rule to route messages to a separate folder in outlook. This method may
be useful to your other customers as well...
David
Scott
That little list would be perfect in the manual. It's come up many times.
Worth a cut and paste just as it is.
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mark
Any help on nuclear fusion would be helpful as well. But only if you have
time! ;)
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
I have the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelisted in Declude Junkmail ...
it is an alias that points within Imail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it passes Declude Junkmail due to the whitelist, is it scanned a
second time when Imail passes it along as an alias?
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned
, and the other domains that
happen to be on stat.com (they are not virtual ... they have IP
numbers).
But the email passing through to idf.stat.com and the off-site
machines doesn't seem to be stopped?
Yes, no?
Thanks, David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
But the email passing through to idf.stat.com and the off-site
machines doesn't seem to be stopped?
That's because IMail treats those domains as remote (outgoing E-mail), so
the actions in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file will be used. To get
around this, you can have per-domain settings
That's because IMail treats those domains as remote (outgoing E-mail), so
the actions in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file will be used. To get
around this, you can have per-domain settings for those domains (so that
mail to those domains won't be treated the same as outgoing mail).
through ...
Suggestions on how to deal with this?
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
SPEWS did the same thing to us. Blocked our entire C and incorrectly listed
it as a UUNet dial-up. Forget about getting de-listed with them, won't
happen. Their draconian tactics give anti-spammers a bad name.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Perhaps this list might be a way to set up test account exchanges??
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fighting
Why is this IP failing Spamcop?
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?162.42.150.35
The link says it falls below the threshold and shouldn't be listed.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
Hi all,
I'm receiving false positives from some legitimate lists I belong to.
For example, the Macromedia Partners Only newsletter fails the
HELOBOGUS and REVDNS tests. Should I bother to alert them or are these
failures typical of bulk mailing apps that will likely not be corrected?
Any input
Thank you, Scott. I'll let 'em know.
Dave
R. Scott Perry wrote:
I'm receiving false positives from some legitimate lists I belong to.
For example, the Macromedia Partners Only newsletter fails the
HELOBOGUS and REVDNS tests. Should I bother to alert them or are these
failures typical of
Hi all,
I'm curious to know how other Declude JunkMail users are configuring their
software. What are your favorite tweaks to the default rules and actions? Are
sender blacklists worth the effort? Are commercial subscriptions (MAPS, etc.)
worth the expense?
Perhaps more importantly, is there
:
David,
Tuesday, October 8, 2002 you wrote:
DD What are your favorite tweaks to the default rules and actions?
Employ a weight system. I use a simple system with only two
weights but others have more complex systems. This will take some
effort depending upon your particular
Thanks for the suggestion -- that page has been updated
to include links to
the archives.
Wow, THAT was fast! Thank you, Scott!
Could you define your version of a discussion forum?
My definition is
similar enough to a mailing list that I'm not sure what you are looking
for.
I define a
Hi all,
How do I apply a blacklist against the Received: header -- not merely the Reply
To: header? I realize that this has been discussed ad nauseum, but in scanning
the archives and manual, I still don't have a clear understanding.
For example, our blacklist (from imagefxonline) contains the
Thank you for the clarifications, Scott.
To check the HELO/EHLO text (the
domain that appears in the Received: header), you can set up a HELO filter
(with Declude JunkMail Pro, using the latest release).
But a filter requires the four-column format HELO 10 CONTAINS spammer.com which
would
Again, this is something that we are looking into, but we just haven't made
any final decisions about.
Thank you, Scott. I can't ask for much more than that.
Dave
--
David M. Delbridge
President CEO
Circa 3000
ColdFusion Hosting
http://www.circa3k.com
775-832-2445
---
[This E-mail
think?
Dave
--
David M. Delbridge
President CEO
Circa 3000
ColdFusion Hosting
http://www.circa3k.com
775-832-2445
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
been typing F**K OFF
into Microsoft Word for years, but the program still hasn't done
anything resembling my request.
Dave
--
David M. Delbridge
President CEO
Circa 3000
ColdFusion Hosting
http://www.circa3k.com
775-832-2445
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
fewer passes on the
entire body of an e-mail message. Bam!
I hope this is helpful and that I'm not being a nuisance. Being that I
AM a programmer, this little puzzle is intriguing.
Oh, and I drink too much caffeine
Dave
--
David M. Delbridge
President CEO
Circa 3000
ColdFusion Hosting
Hi all,
It just gets better and better
I just received a spam message from 'givemegiveme.com' which bares a
nifty Member of Spamming Bureau seal-of-approval, with big red letters
Report Spam Here. Not surprisingly, the link goes to givemegiveme.com
-- not some third-party spam-fighting
with the attachment can be forwarded to
the intended recipient. The recipient can open the attachment and reply as
usual. Most people don't look at the return address. I was tired of getting
replys to postmaster from mail I retreived and forwarded on to the intended
recipient.
David
-Original Message
-1: winter into spring
XOUTHEADER X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
XOUTHEADER X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
etc
Or, would it be better to implement insertion of Habeas headers in
IMail?
Any help is appreciated.
Dave
--
David M. Delbridge
President CEO
Circa 3000
(1DCB00DC) [65.217.137.37] EHLO mx1
20021106 001305 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (1DCB00DC) [65.217.137.37]
unacceptable mail address in MAIL FROM:Eddy
Thanks,
David Barrett
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
I have a customer that uses EzMTS, a Windows freeware mailserver. When ever
a message goes through that server and Declude all the Xheaders added by
Declude show up in the body of the mail. Can I assure him that it's his
problem (EzMTS).
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
Scott
This is a message that arrives from the EzMTS mailserver to IMail/Declude.
David
I have a customer that uses EzMTS, a Windows freeware
mailserver. When ever
a message goes through that server and Declude all the Xheaders added by
Declude show up in the body of the mail. Can I
Hi folks,
I recently re-installed IMail Declude after upgrading our mail server
and immediately noticed a drop in JunkMail's accuracy. I now realize
that in nine days, NONE of the IP4R tests or RHSBL tests have logged a
single hit. What might cause this?
The re-installation should have
Thank you for the replies,
The DNS servers appear to be working fine. NSLOOKUP from a DOS prompt
on the mail server to either of the DNS servers specified in IMail's
SMTP service settings answers all of my queries, authoritative and
recursive. Is there another test I might perform?
Speaking of
1 - 100 of 1152 matches
Mail list logo
