The original install of Declude includes a line in global.cfg that
states WHITELIST HABEAS. I assume I can remark this out since we are
receiving warnings in the log files called Invalid Whitelist test
Habeas. Thanks for the input.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Scott,
Thanks for the reply. Speaking of the beta version - is it best
to run the beta vs the 1.60. I guess we shy on the conservative side so
at first glance the 1.60 was a good fit, however, if the 1.62 version is
better (i.e. more features, bug fixes), and has proven stable, we may
I've seen several emails come thru referencing 3rd party hold
readers/reviewers. Does anyone have a pref on one. Also, I have gotten
some feedback from Scott (much apprec.) on what he sees as a initial
setup for guarding against spam. I would like to see what options
others have unlocked or
as
this forum.
Keith Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:tom;imagefxonline.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx
50% effective
List of spammers caught by the Fromfile
If you don't mind, is this report 1.05b something that I could download
(i.e. declude website). If so, what is the name of this reporting tool?
Thank you,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Believe I found it, called DeLog by Image'fx Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Shared Kill File Stats
If you don't mind, is this report 1.05b something that I
Tom,
You are awesome, thanks for such great tools and support.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Juliano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Shared Kill File Stats
If you don't mind, is
Sandy,
I am very interested in your beta code (understanding it's beta). Thank
you for your knowledge and contribution.
Keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 12/18/2002 9:00
Please forgive me for me not knowing, but what is the all_list.dat?
Thanks..
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat
Should we be downloading
of? Thanks for the aid..
___
Keith Johnson
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
The adult sender's list I have was gathered over time from
reports from users and from ones I have seen in the SPAM folder.
I would be happy to share it.
That would be awesome if you don't mind. Please email me off list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Again, thank you for your time and professionalism
Kami,
If you don't mind sharing with me as well. We are trying to
tighten down and it is always great to gain perspective from someone in
the trenches. Off list email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your
time.
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: Don Schreiner [mailto:[EMAIL
I know this is off subject for this forum, but has anyone experienced any problems
posting to the Imail Forum list. I have posted several messages, but they have not
appeared and I haven't seen anything posted since yesterday around 6pm. Thanks for
the info.
Keith
+¨¥Á«,q©çy×è®ø«ºÇ¬o
We are using the Junkmail Pro edition in an email ISP like environment (i.e. numerous
virtual domains). We have setup Junkmail Pro to send the spam for each domain into a
central mailbox that an admin would then periodically check for any false pos. and
thus forward respect. I wanted to gain
know if our test fails a fromfile test it lists in the header. Thanks for any aid.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
Adam,
Would love a copy emailed ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), although my logs
are just now going over 10mb, we keep adding customers weekly, so it
won't be long before it is to large to handle. Thanks for the program,
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hobach [mailto:[EMAIL
Kami,
I wanted to see if it would be possible to look at your lists, however, I
noticed it required a password. Thank you again.
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: Kami Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 1/21/2003 6:46 PM
To:
Title: How to append footer to a single domain using Jmail Pro
How would I go about setting a footer for a single domain on their Outgoing email? I understand I should use the catchallmails but not sure how? Thanks for the aid.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
I use a product called wintail for Windows (like tail from Unix), it is available from
www.wintail.com for free. It allows you to look realtime a spool file while the
connections are being made, thus not having to open notepad up, close it, open it,
etc. Good luck,
Keith
Scott,
Do you have any suggestions on a filter we could use to
accomplish the FOOTER on outgoing email (per prior message)? I have a
customer who wants this for legal reasons. I have asked that he could
place a 'signature' on each of his email clients, however, he doesn't
want to give
John,
Speaking of lists, whose lists do you use.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Comments
On the subject of the new comments
Darrell,
That is awesome. I get those same requests from our clients
weekly. I appreciate your time in writing it.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Darrell L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Steve,
If I am not mistaken (Scott can correct me), since Declude has already looked
at it once, you can forward this to the intended user and it won't get scanned again
by JunkMail.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Steve Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL
Steve,
From your previous message you stated you were using the ROUTETO
parameter to a mailbox called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I am running the weight10 test, and doing a ROUTETO
to a mailbox called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What we do is have the customer (admin for that host.com) login
to
.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:29 AM
Since late last year we have had our entire setup with virtual hosted domains with No
Mail Relay. We are going to change our relay mode to 'relay for addresses' to filter
email for about 10 or more Exchange Servers (thus, store and forward). However, we
are going to still require all our
.
JT Fullerton, CA 92835
JT www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Store and Forward w
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Scott,
You are a wonderful human being, thanks for all your aid, you
fixed it before I even asked
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Store
It states in the manual that by default JunkMail will use the outgoing section configs
of the global.cfg file to scan 'gateway' (store and forward) domains. However, use
the per domain configurations to override the behavior. With this in mind, will the
fromfile filters and tests I have
I wanted to gain some advise on using message sniffer. It seems to be (from forum
comments) to be an awesome product. Is the message sniffer database of know spammers
kept up on their end and the test within declude checks it? Is the test quick per
10,000 emails? Thanks for the info.
Thank you for the info and link. From a transmission standpoint, when the sniffer
test is called, does it send you the message, you scan it, and then report back. Or
do you come to the message and scan it and then report back. Thank you again, for
your time.
Keith Johnson
TAIS Web
Wilcox World Travel Tours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL
.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
Another strange occurrence, is prior to the upgrade, in our
postmaster.eml
file for Declude Virus we had notifications going to two different
recipients (prior both domains were virtual to our box). These two
different domains are now setup as store/forward domains,
however, they
and understand that, then I can Whitelist for one specific domains as well. Thank you for the aid.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
Scott,
Thank you. What scenario I have is a company coming on board
that has list-serv email they do not want to have weights given against.
But, if this lists do indeed fail our tests then I would like for them
to be the only ones to get it, not all my other domains. It sounds like
the
are interested.
Darrell LaRock
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Analyzer - Comments Needed
Darrell,
That is awesome. I
Scott,
Is this thread something different than the Whitelistfile option for the per
domain junkmail configs (using 1.67beta)?
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 3/3/2003 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL
Scott,
How common is this type of entry in the header - Disposition-Notification-To: ?
We are seeing a few of these get through, however, it seems there is some code,
Googled the above, that send a read receipt back to the user, thus you end up with yet
more junkmail. Is this common
Scott,
If we use the ROUTETO (fail Weight20) command with our Store and Forward
domains, the spamming domain will show up as a domain that sent mail OUT in my
domlist? I took a look today and I saw tons of domains in there with 1 or more emails
a piece and the only thing I could
.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
for some
suggestions. Thanks for the aid.
___
Keith
Johnson, MCP Network Engineer
Network Advocates,
Inc. Tel:
502.412.1050 Fax:
502.412.1058 Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Good pings come in small
packets"
? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
Johnson
-Original Message-From: John Tolmachoff
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003
4:28 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Filter Help
Use delete action
on that test.
John
Tolmachoff MCSE
Is it possible to place wildcards in the whitelistfile (using 1.67beta). For example,
user is requesting to allow everything for *.il.us Can I put wildcards in the
whitelistfile or just put .il.usThanks for the info.
áÁj)pjË jyÞuú+¾*î±ëÈ7ç^V*î²m§ÿðÃ^r[yÊN¬f¢yúèØ^
ç%¹ºy j)fj)b
Per John's advice (thanks for the post), I have setup the following on a Store and
Forward Domain, I am using 1.67beta Pro Version
In my Global file:
EXEMPL filter c:\Imail\Declude\exempl.txt x 0 0
In my Default JunkMail file for that domain
EXEMPL DELETE
In my
Are you using a copyall account? If so, ALLRECIPS would contain the
copyall account as well as the user that you were sending to, so ALLRECIPS
0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED] would never match.
Scott, I am not using the 'copyall' account. However, this is on a
Scott,
Thanks for the discovery. The reason I was wanting to use the IS, is due to
not wanting to step on email addresses that maybe valid. For example, if he had an
ex-employee that had the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] , but has a valid user called
[EMAIL PROTECTED] If I use the
Andy,
We have a bunch of gateway domains setup and works great. You have to have
the Pro version and setup per domain folders under declude folder (i.e. folder called
example.com) with a default junkmail file inside it. Define your tests within the
Global.cfg file and then set actions
Title: Message
Scott,
I meant to ask you if the ALLRECIPS functionality was by
design, or was this something you were working on altering. Thanks for the
info.
Keith
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
JohnsonSent: Saturday
Scott,
It says in the release notes for 1.68:
Whitelist files will now work as exact matches, rather than partial matches
Does this mean that if we have whitelistfile in the default.junkmail file that we
need to have the exact match (email addresses) to let through. For example,
to automate a 'HoneyPot' type of scenario. Thanks for the suggestions.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammanager question
We have the sniffer product and it works great, we wanted
; (put together no spaces). Has others seen this, and how are you detecting it. Thanks for the info.
___
Keith Johnson
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
Title: Message
Are
these type of emails been seen for awhile or are they new?
Thanks...
Keith
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:38 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Character
Entities
We are starting to see a flood
.
Again, thanks for the aid, I wouldn't push it this hard, but we have gotten numerous
of these slipping through.
http://www.intuitive.com/coolweb/entities.html
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Fri 6/13/2003 5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Given that OSSRC and OSSOFT are no longer effective, besides EASYNET-DNSBL and
SPAMCOP, what are others giving good Weight to, thanks for the info.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 8/1/2003 5:01 PM
To:
global file, what should I
alter to pickup just the sbl.spamhaus.org database? Thanks for the aid.
Keith Johnson
Does anyone have any configs they are willing to share that they are using in
production for Alligate with Declude? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
áÁj)pjË jyÞuú+¾*î±ëÈ7ç^V*î²m§ÿðÃ^r[yÊN¬f¢yúèØ^
ç%¹ºy j)fj)b b²Ôèº{.nÇ+·£ºËlzwZI[hf¢Êïuç%¹¢f§vzé ®Þ
ç%¹ºy j)S
æ«r¯zÇ·¢éÝjØm¶ÿÃ
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate
Does anyone have any configs they are willing to share that they are using in
production for Alligate
Rob,
If you don't mind sharing, what config settings do you use for
Alligate..
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Robert Grosshandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate vs. Message
Rob,
How does the AUTOWhite handle spoofed addressing when someone
uses my address to send email? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Robert Grosshandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I have a customer who only wants to get email to a list of valid
employees, no one else (i.e. ex-employees). However, the list of
ex-employees is too long for him to come up with, thus he gave me the
list of valids. I looked, but I don't think Declude has a HEADER tag
called DOESNOT CONTAIN,
Scott,
The problem with using the CONTAINS is that I would have to have
a list of the ex-employees and the only list he can put together is the
good employees. Thus if I used the CONTAINS I would be hitting good
employee email. Any other suggestions, thanks for your time.
Keith
What
Delete the nobody alias. Then, only valid email in his domain will be
accepted. Delete all old employees not on the list of valid names you
just received from the domain.
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
The problem with using the CONTAINS is that I would have to have
a
list
Scott,
SWEET, that is a great idea, I'll give it a go, you are the man.
Keith Johnson
CONTAINS *would* work in this way. For example:
HEADERS -1000 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HEADERS -1000 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
In this case, an E-mail
Scott,
I spoke to soon. If I use the weighting method, it hurts my ability to use
the Weight system to guard them against Spam. Your thoughts...
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Tue 9/2/2003 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Scott,
Since we house mulitple domains (using spam filtering) and this filter test is
used in the Global file it seems it would fail every other domain email (i.e. 1000
weight) that we house on the same box?! Is there a way to only define it for use in
the default config file for that
Mishi,
I am running 8.02 and 7.15HF2 with Relay for Addresses and Declude JM Pro
1.75i and I just ran the test and produced perfect results on both machines. It only
reported 'Unknown User' and 'Not a local gateway', which is great. What relay setting
are you running and version of
r to relay.
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
JohnsonSent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:34 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Declude failing openrelay test
Mishi,
I am running
Scott,
The DECODE OFF option; what would it not catch (i.e. Spam) had the option been
turned on? I understand Base64, but what kind of HTML decoding? We have a server at
capacity as well, but we are not adding anymore customers to it, however, at times the
CPU is at 100% which causes
Scott,
If I add the new interim release, what does JM Pro do to an
email it finds with this trigger? Do I need to add anything to the
global.cfg file? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003
I have a strange request, however, I don't think it can be done. I have
a store-and-forward domain (Exchange User) that would like for us to
forward individual spam email to another location for each individual
user. The catch is, they don't want to send us their individual user
email addresses
shows a return of *. I just wanted to get a sanity check on the proper use of return
codes, especially if they list as Various. Also, if the show in the Global.cfg as *,
yet on the Declude Website have a return code, should I replace the * with a code.
Thanks for the time.
Keith Johnson
N¬f
We have a unique issue in that we have a customer that gets email to
user-user (alias) that goes to an account called useruser (without the
hyphen), both on our server, within same domain. When a spam email
comes in addressed to the alias and other users within the same domain,
it gets scanned by
Scott,
Would you like the Declude Log or the Sys Log from IMail? This domain was
setup as mail.domain.com in Imail and there is an alias on it for domain.com (transfer
from another vendor Imail server), I have a Declude folder called mail.domain.com,
however do I need one called
For the alias, you'll need to use the domain that the alias resolves
to. If it resolves to the official name of the domain (mail.domain.com),
then you can use the same directory. But if you are using a different
domain for the alias than the official name of the domain, then you would
need to
Mike,
The Easynet-Dyna test is an external ip4r DNS test setup in your global.cfg
file. See the Declude link below to see further info on this.
http://www.declude.com/Junkmail/support/ip4r.htm
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Michael Graveen [mailto:[EMAIL
I have also noticed today that it appears Declude JunkMail is no
longer calculating weights correctly.
If you upgrade to the latest interim release at
http://www.declude.com/release/176i/declude.exe , it takes care of
this
issue.
Wasn't actually expecting a response until tomorrow
We use both Declude (1.76beta) and Sniffer and both work great.
However, we are are in the process of trying to run several Sniffer
tests and take action on individual return codes rather than nonzero.
It is my understanding that Declude will only call the Sniffer test once
although numerous
Since Imail doesn't have a way to reject an email based on its size when
a domain is setup in a Gateway scenario (i.e. store and forward), I
thought I would post this to the Declude community. Does Declude JMPro
have a way to bounce an email based upon its size? What we are seeing,
is when an
We are running Declude JMPro Version 1.76i13. Most of our domains are
setup using the Per Domain configuration, in those configs, we have
setup ROUTETO statements to route their spam to a certain email address
either local or remote. Since last Thursday (off and on before that),
some spam email
Does the Declude JunkMail log file show any information about the
E-mail? There have been unconfirmed reports of IMail v8 skipping Declude
processing that we are investigating
I have a few emails saved that passed through Declude unscanned if they would be
helpful.
We are starting to see this
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude does not see email
Scott,
This issue of Declude (1.76i and Imail
8.04)not seeing email has picked up tremendously in the past week or
so. We are starting to see this a lot in our own email as well as our
customers reporting it. It seems to be
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude does not see email
Kami,
That is exactly what I am seeing, no record of
it. It scares me that email is getting through our system for our
customers, yet it is unscanned. We handle total of about 150K emails each
day across two servers and we are seeing
Scott,
For those of us that have had email (daily) skipping Declude
calling would it be good for us to move up to the 1.76i27 to have that
logged for you?
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL
Although this is not the same issue as Declude not getting called, I did want to bring
it to everyones attention. For those of you that Store and Forward to other email
servers, Imail 8.04 is having issues with removing body text from emails on the smtp
rdeliver action to a remote server. I
Scott,
It looks as if IpSwitch may have fixed the issue in 8.05 that
keeps Declude from being called.
Taken from 8.05 Release Notes...
o Queuemgr: Decreased the possibility that during a queue run the
queuemgr might process files before a third party process
locks the message.
Keith
I read the following on the Register. Does anyone know if we can include this
into Declude? Thanks for the aid:
Clip taken from: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/34690.html
However, Spamhaus plans to fight back. Yesterday, it released its
We are giving our Declude filters an overhaul this week, adding in all
the functionality of the new 'beta' tests and I wanted to ensure I am
good on the following:
Using Examples SKIPWEIGHT 70
MAXWEIGHT 60
MINWEIGHT 20
MAXWEIGHT: If during the run of the
, 2004 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification
That is all correct (just one note to clarify, though: END will stop
processing that one filter, but other tests will run).
-Scott
At 10:35 AM 1/21/2004, Keith Johnson wrote:
We
I noticed in our Declude Log (running MID) that we have numerous of the below message
(different domains). Is this telling me that there was no MX or A record listed for
the lookup domain? I pretty sure, however, just wanted to check, thanks for the aid.
Keith
WARNING: DNS server
Scott,
Thanks for the aid. I'm with you on the second point, I think our DNS server
(Bind 8.4.3) attempted to verify the domain (all of them look spam in nature) and
couldn't find an A or MX listed for them and returned back to Declude that warning. I
appreciate the speedy response,
Scott,
A took some time and went through the log and found that the following was
true on all the ones I checked (around 50) entries, the following examples were found
using dnsreport.com about the Warnings:
Getting MX record for mail3b-better-health.wsol8423.com... Received an
Scott,
I took some time and went through the log and found that the
following was true on all the ones I checked (around 50) entries, the following
examples were found using dnsreport.com about the Warnings:
Getting MX record for
). Also, if
Declude gets this back, it cancels processing of not only the DNS based tests,
but also filters or external programs (i.e. Sniffer) according to the log.
Thanks for the aid.
Keith
From: Keith Johnson Sent: Sunday,
January 25, 2004 1:55 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE
What would cause extra CR in the middle of a line in the Virus or
Declude log files or incomplete line entries? We have a Parser that
runs through to pull out info, however, at times it will encounter the
above and have to skip the entries. Thanks for the info.
Keith
---
[This E-mail was
The most recent update today from F-Prot will catch it, just checked it
in the virlist.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mydoom.b
It is not
Marc,
I had great succes with the AOL Postmaster line at:
1.888.212.5537 I worked with a guy named, John Rardin, he fixed a few
client issues in a timely fashion. I emailed him a few of the client
emails and he was able to figure out why it was being blocked by them
and in 1 case they
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
