Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- SpamReview the Kill File

2002-09-17 Thread Sanford Whiteman
In some cases, not necessarily this one, SpamReview will use mindspring or the reply address where as Declude will say it's from a different address. Sounds like a pretty useless app, if so. You see the dilemma, I would go after all of them, something's gota eventually byte.

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- SpamReview the Kill File

2002-09-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Not exactly, I actually verify each and every site before I consider listing them in my kill file or ISP file. Great--the point is that SpamReview's bugs, if they're grabbing faked intermediate second-level domains (mindspring.net in your example) and suggesting that they be killed when

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Date Header wrong - REALLY?

2002-09-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Is there a knowledge base entry listing the headers that Imail injects? No. But these are they, AFAIK: Received: Message-Id: From: Date: X-RCPT-TO: Status: X-UIDL: Note that messages must have basic RFC822-style header and body sections in order for these headers to be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo Abuse Account

2002-09-23 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Seems Yahoo (at least groups) fails the abuse test when they do have an abuse account. yahoogroups.com should not fail, but yahoo.com proper (pardon the expression) should fail NOABUSE (they attempt to route people to [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is all well and good, but non-RFC). If

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] order of processing problem

2002-10-21 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Oh great. I don't have a support contract and really dont feel like shelling out the $$ for 7.1x. I hear ya. Any workaround? You could write a custom program alias to do the filtering. But this probably won't be worth the effort for just your mailbox alone. Note that this isn't a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IMail API

2002-10-31 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I realize that this mailing list is devoted to JunkMail discussions; however, I was referred here ...from where? Any help or a link to another group that would be able to help me would be greatly appreciated. Try signing up for the IMail Forum at:

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.62 (beta) released

2002-11-04 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Seems to me that this would add a LOT of false positives, especially from larger ISPs where the outgoing relay servers aren't necessarily the same as the incoming (the only ones listed in MX records) smtp servers. Am I all wet on this? I agree with you completely. In fact, even with tiny

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help

2002-11-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I believe this to be the first of many emails trying desperately to tweak every last feature of IMail and Declude to get the performance that I need. Please let me know anything you might need from me. Performance Monitor will help you figure out whether only the CPU is being pegged, or

[Declude.JunkMail] HOWTO(ish): Self-expiring whitelists

2002-11-30 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Web Based Interface

2002-12-01 Thread Sanford Whiteman
What I am trying to figure out is what holds/creates the string : Xade9939bcc9fcf9aee8571e9 In other words, How do I crack IWEBMSG session security? What are you trying to do with this information? -Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Web Based Interface

2002-12-01 Thread Sanford Whiteman
With all respect if we were trying to hack Imail then why ask such question in this user group? Stranger things have happened. :) I knew that wasn't what you *meant* in terms of your end results, but in practical terms your proposed implementation would have required it. -Sandy ---

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Web Based Interface

2002-12-01 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Guys, Nobody uses Finger anymore, right? Well, check this out: with a few cosmetic tweaks to chgplan.html, pchgplan.html, and dropdown.cgi, you can give your users a fully IMail-served per-user blacklist, with the data stored in the unused PLAN.IMA and users none the wiser. Combine this

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] How Does IPNOTINMX Work?

2002-12-02 Thread Sanford Whiteman
So, IPNOTINMX compares the MX IP against the SENDER (workstation) IP? Not the SENDING MAIL SERVER'S IP? It compares to the connecting IP, which in your case was your directly connected workstation. For remote connections, it would indeed be the mail server. -Sandy --- [This E-mail was

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Do spammers rank recipients

2002-12-09 Thread Sanford Whiteman
However he does travel quite a lot for our company and meet with clients, so his profile is much more public than mine. If applicable, you should tell him to be particularly careful at Internet cafes abroad. I have heard tell of numerous cases in which a business trip, and a lot

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] how to block multiple @ sign in To field

2002-12-09 Thread Sanford Whiteman
...a spammer sends anemailto [EMAIL PROTECTED]@myvaliddomain.com. The imail server is accepting the email since @myvaliddomain.com is a local domain and then sending the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only if your IMail relay permissions are

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] how to block multiple @ sign in To field

2002-12-09 Thread Sanford Whiteman
We have our smtp server running Declude...The smtp server is then forwarding the emails to our pop server This is a perfectly fine configuration, and does not constitute a multistage relay UNLESS you have your POP3 server set to relay for/to the IP of your SMTP server; if you have it

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail/iMail domain names.

2002-12-10 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Right but that doesn't work for gateway systems. :) It does. Tom's illustrating the use of dummy virtuals to get outgoing mail bound to a specific EHLO/HELO hostname. The virtuals do not accept mail to the gatewayed domain, just forward it on as they would any non-local domain that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-11 Thread Sanford Whiteman
John, How effective is Declude in doing say a 50 line filter test as compared to a program that is doing a filter test of the same configuration? A little vague, no? How good is IMail at SMTP deliveries, compared to my proprietary MTA? -Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS filter

2002-12-15 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I wish we could automatically have the address that has sent that email added to a temporary blacklist. You can. I described in a HOWTO a couple of weeks ago our use of Program Aliases for dynamic whitelisting, and the same technique could be used for blacklisting. -Sandy --- [This

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-16 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Is this something that is important enough that it would be worthwhile? I don't think it's worth the effort technically, though it may well be so in a financial sense. Nobody seems to have acknowledged my message about REDIRECTing to PLAN.IMA for per-user actions, but I am

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-16 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Admittedly, we're a small ISP and may not be representative of the entire group, but I'm not convinced we would even use such a product. Okay, makes sense. Many admins would quite sensibly not want to surrender control, and server resources, to a chaotic--not to say

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-17 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Decjunkmail, I have a few comments on your post. The lack of a web-based GUI is probably the one main feature that keeps some of your competitors in business. I disagree strongly. I can't say what Scott's competitive research has shown, but the fact that Declude is a third-party

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-17 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Mark, However, a web GUI will be very hard to do without the 'masters' kept in a database. Without a database you'll run into file locking problems and it will be harder to deal with single records. ODBC for text files? :) I fear you've been in the MS world too long. When ODBC is used

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-17 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Chuck, Ok, I just have to say it. As Declude evolves, I think their dependance on Imail needs to lessen (another good reason for Declude provided HTTP service). See my earlier post for some thoughts on this. -Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re: DSN:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-17 Thread Sanford Whiteman
E-mail is sent to entered e-mail address for conformation Well, I guess we know what you're doing with the bounces. :) -Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-17 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Many people, including me, have asked IpSwitch to do something like this. Also because declude does NOT get called when e-mail in entered using the web interface. I have Declude scanning all mail using an undocumented technique. I will post it, if you promise not to ask Scott

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I have Declude scanning all mail using an undocumented technique. I will post it, if you promise not to ask Scott directly (seriously). Please pretty please. The reason Declude cannot scan mail sent from IWEBMSG is that IWEBMSG uses IMAIL1 to encode messages, and IMAIL1 is hard-coded to

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Nobody seems to have acknowledged my message about REDIRECTing to PLAN.IMA for per-user actions, but I am using the method with great success to provide user self-management from *within* IMail Web Messaging. If I, no JavaScript guru, can do it, surely others could go this or similar

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No return address- trend

2002-12-20 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Does MAILFROM filter detect invalid FROM addresses? Yes, that's why you got the X- header. IMail really should be changed to catch that, thought I must admit that I use those addresses sometimes when testing--faster to type. :) -Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] With new release this git through

2002-12-25 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Eje My understanding is that Outlook Express can't filter based on headers... Joe's talking about the HEADER action, which isn't inserting an RFC822 header, but a header before the original body (closer to word processing terminology). John's answer is spot-on: if the body is

[Declude.JunkMail] SPAManager IWEBMSG add-in demo available

2003-01-02 Thread Sanford Whiteman
, but I thought you might like to take a look: http://209.227.3.6, user demo, pw blue (yes, I'm steering you to a production server). Check out the SPAManager Whitelist and SPAManager settings screens and let me know your thoughts. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAManager IWEBMSG add-in demo available

2003-01-03 Thread Sanford Whiteman
There is one thing that I just really can not figure out how to do. How do you get the plan.ima file to copy into the declude config directory? I don't. I use REDIRECT. -Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from

[Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Code a400010b -- not at /tools/header?

2003-01-07 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Scott/All, I can't retrieve the extended info for code a400010b. Does anyone have it on hand? -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory

2003-01-07 Thread Sanford Whiteman
So there are a lot of msgs where the remote mailserver after some mb's of transfered data terminates the trasmission. Any mail server that terminates the session instead of sending a 5xx is broken, as it's just inviting more waste on both sides. If the server terminates

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Code a400010b -- not at /tools/header?

2003-01-07 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I can't retrieve the extended info for code a400010b. Does anyone have it on hand? That one is caused by a missing To: header. Thanks--I would've caught it if I'd had the original e-mail, but I just had the alert. Is it indeed not at /tools/badheaders? -Sandy --- [This E-mail was

[Declude.JunkMail] Feature requests: LOOSEN HELOBOGUS ON/OFF, REVNOTHELO

2003-01-07 Thread Sanford Whiteman
to discuss it. Please post your thoughts. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory

2003-01-07 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Why they don't answer with an 5xx code? There was one single 531 - Mailbox has exceeded disk quota today... Because they're stupid. They don't want to wait, so they just keep it comin' 1/2 hour later. If the server terminates the session and blacklists you temporarily or permanently for

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature requests: LOOSEN HELOBOGUS ON/OFF, REVNOTHELO

2003-01-07 Thread Sanford Whiteman
It's also important to realize the purpose of the HELOBOGUS test. It isn't designed primarily to catch spammers. It's designed to help detect poorly administered mailservers -- ones that are likely to be abused by spammers. True, but if you're using HELOBOGUS for anything other

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Pots Kettles in the Clair de Lune

2003-01-08 Thread Sanford Whiteman
to review this policy in the future, I do hope you consider that your own systems violate it. :) Sincerely yours, Sandy -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mimeserver

2003-01-10 Thread Sanford Whiteman
The software apparently quarantines them as undetermined due to malformed headers. What headers are malformed? Could you post a sample header of a quarantined message? Have you controlled for MUA errors? As I'm sure you know, Scott does not create bad MIME, and adding

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Service Introduced To Help Legitimate Bulk Mailers Evade Spam Filters

2003-01-07 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Horrifying doublespeak: they agree that spamtraps are foolproof evidence of harvesting, and yet they may somehow be found in an otherwise verifiable opt-in list? I'm sure their verification process is really in-depth. Anyone thought about how much they could have made by getting

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail and Imail 6.05

2003-01-14 Thread Sanford Whiteman
So what I am trying to do is to clean out the junkmail folders for all the users to only keep the past 7 days in there (maybe less) So I need to remove messages by date out of the junkmail.mbx files... Two batch files, ITERATE.BAT and EXPIRE.BAT: ITERATE.BAT --- c: CD c:\imail FOR

Re: Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList Per User or Domain?

2003-01-16 Thread Sanford Whiteman
blue) for an example of how we do the same thing with more granular control (we don't believe in fully whitelisting by address alone, as you will see). -Sandy -- Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Base64 encoded

2003-01-21 Thread Sanford Whiteman
While I never followed up or asked any ones opinion, not that it has come up again, read through the attached text file and see what you think. I think, Ugh. M$ at it again, and their faithful admins recite their inconsistent rhetoric as if it's perfectly normal. As you point out, their

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ideas on a way to use the AUTOWHITELIST option to allow spam to come through?

2003-01-22 Thread Sanford Whiteman
It would be nice for some of our customers to allow users to add an entry to their address book that would allow all spam to come through... We use *@example.com (everyone at one domain) and * (everyone at all domains) in our custom app, which uses aliases.txt as a whitelist.

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Hello

2003-01-22 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Descriptive Subject lines will get you much better answers, but Scott's already gotten back to you. Is there a way that if the sender is a recognized user of our mail system to ignore all spam filters? You mean if the sender impersonates a recognized user (like so many spammers do)?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PERCENT test

2003-01-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
The question: Why PERCENT should be a sign for spam that recieve 50% of the hold action in your default config file? Have I missed something? It would be very rare that a sender HAS to use source-routing such as the % method, so the assumption is that anyone doing so is either

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Selective clean up of mail folders

2003-01-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
My question, is there a clean-up utility along the lines of immsgexp.exe that can be directed to only work on selected mailboxes? Search archives first...just posted last week. -Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] ---

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows API call to WINSOCK.DLL

2003-01-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
It's for a project where we're running a name server with spam-vertised domain names, IP Numbers and phone numbers. We have an .exe to pick them out of emails, now we need to look them up on the name server. The ultimate goal would be to get the IP address of a spam-vertised

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows API call to WINSOCK.DLL

2003-01-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
You are going to need a DLL to do this, ASP with VB does not provide any of these functions by default. I believe if you use Simple DNS + you will be able to interact with it via ASP and VB. You can interact with MS DNS through DDNS (though there too, you'd have to either shell with

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows API call to WINSOCK.DLL

2003-01-29 Thread Sanford Whiteman
The project is to set up a dns server to list spam-vertised domain names, plus all of the opt-in services domain names. Right. And are you successfully updating the name server at this point? This was some of the confusion: some people were giving suggestions for DNS server

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows API call to WINSOCK.DLL

2003-01-30 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Right again, but we want to use the native Windows API call, which we know is there, for a few different reasons. We will also want GetHostByAddr functionality incase we want to index spam-vertised IP numbers. Gotcha. So... Sounds like the COM objects for ASP, and either COM or

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] New Tests?

2003-02-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
monitoring/spyware, which is in a sense its direct opposite. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail

Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail]

2003-03-09 Thread Sanford Whiteman
, but hard to unlearn--they think that RRs have no false negatives). -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail

Re: SPAMCOP:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
it). -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
if the SendName is broken. Make sure all of your paths are correct as well, and post your logs. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible exploit on mail server

2003-03-31 Thread Sanford Whiteman
ports through your fw for some reason? -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] from name test

2003-04-02 Thread Sanford Whiteman
, but squelched by SPAMCHK. I would just warn everyone to be aware of the likelihood of false positives, especially from well-behaved, even distinctly anti-spam, sources. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...

2003-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Scott, does IMail do it's ip4r checking after the whole message is received and the connection terminated or does check on the HELO/EHLO and send an error code back to the remote server? Hey, didn't I already answer this? :) -Sandy Sanford

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] New Variable Question ?

2003-05-31 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fail safe-- ideas

2003-06-01 Thread Sanford Whiteman
counterweighted account for exactly this purpose, then look at the headers after it comes in. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Accounting for secondary MX

2003-06-02 Thread Sanford Whiteman
, and automatically start scanning based on the IP of the mail server that connected to the backup mail server. You can have up to 20 IPBYPASS lines in the global.cfg file. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] yahoo as spam

2003-06-03 Thread Sanford Whiteman
on incoming, while faster on outgoing, would also be ugh-worthy. Perhaps there's a more advanced logic that could be employed, though. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-19 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL

2003-06-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Does that mean that Cisco firewalls can't be set up not to interfere with SMTP transactions? Nah, PIXes are fine with no smtp fixup. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
be (relatively) handicapped. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup

2003-06-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
in application proxying (WatchGuard, etc.), its proxy functions are not as well thought out. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
, worry about where the SendName comes into the overall process flow. :) -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E

Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
process as a beta tester for several versions. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
process as a beta tester for several versions. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

Re[8]: [Declude.JunkMail] Test on Imail X-header

2003-06-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
concerns (as clearly it was not), should be avoided. -Sandy -- Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --- [This E-mail was scanned

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web based User Configurations

2003-08-19 Thread Sanford Whiteman
wordy sample is at http://webmail.cypressintegrated.com:8383. See the SPAManager Settings areas. Username: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: blue -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] AUTO Whitelist question

2003-08-30 Thread Sanford Whiteman
be possible). -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAManager question

2003-09-02 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Enjoy! -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAManager question

2003-09-03 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Sorry... Username: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: blue (Forgot the cardinal rule for virtual domains!) -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAManager question

2003-09-03 Thread Sanford Whiteman
in the demo) in concert with Declude's REDIRECT command. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: no displayable text in body body

2003-09-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
to originally intended subareas as they are stamped or stomped. Of course, you have mucho associated disk I/O processing, locking issues, etc. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL

Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: no displayable text in body body in body body

2003-09-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
and the like) comes in, accompanied by lots of spam--yet none of the legit mail needs to be read until the start of the working day. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] mailbox forwarding no action

2003-09-10 Thread Sanford Whiteman
exposed internally). While some apps can't handle AUTH, is there some reason that you can't relay by IP? Are these server IPs really changing all that much? -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] mailbox forwarding no action

2003-09-10 Thread Sanford Whiteman
from what your appservers are doing, so you need to get some more consistent results. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SMTP Relay Limit

2003-09-10 Thread Sanford Whiteman
available. If you've been satisfied with IMail's configurability and performance as a gateway, I'd say there's no (0.00%) chance that MS SMTP will disappoint you in that function. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Any easy way

2003-09-16 Thread Sanford Whiteman
...or make a line in declude.junkmail which goes to a global file where u change the settings for all of those having this profile See the REDIRECT keyword. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is it possible

2003-09-22 Thread Sanford Whiteman
having their server just accept the mail to the original address? It's not like the sender is in any way notified of the forward. Please explain further if you wish. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
; at least I can sleep at night. I don't think that's so yesterday. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
was with your idea that *anyone* could/would do the same if the money were right. Just because evil is a constant doesn't mean it's universal (I hope). -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not scanning per domain.

2003-10-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
current setup) will be offset to your benefit. Only your traffic patterns know for sure. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
approximately zero stock in tests this general. YMMV, I suppose. Or perhaps you're not mentioning the aggregate threshold you're going for before actual points are assigned. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
that what most sites need--maybe not yours, by a stroke of luck--is an all-in-one test with intelligently computed weight, such as SPAMCHK or SNIFFER, and not trying to make Declude's FILTER test more sensitive than it's designed to be. -Sandy Sanford

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Processes

2003-11-11 Thread Sanford Whiteman
swamped, you may not see them running. The question is why you're getting swamped, by what, whether a restart helps, etc. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Originating IP -I'm confused, please don't flame me...

2003-11-11 Thread Sanford Whiteman
, the connecting IP remains the same even if WHITELIST AUTH is on--as logic would predict, no? -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Originating IP -I'm confused, please don't flame me...

2003-11-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
you try with IMail Express and see what you think first? You seem a prime candidate for WHITELIST AUTH, and it's painful to know you're jumping through hoops to avoid that straightforward solution. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] URL Redirectors

2003-11-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Not sure why Scott's server hates me :)  Maybe you should try non-HTML. ;) -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web page options for end users

2003-11-14 Thread Sanford Whiteman
universal UI essentially impossible. Once you're more precise in your vision of the functions you'd need, you should post an official RFP to interested parties. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread Sanford Whiteman
(IE if you have MAXWEIGHT 60, and the filter is at 55 points with a line that would add 10 points, processing would stop with a weight of 60, not 65). Sounds like any negative weighting must be frontloaded in the filter file, then? -Sandy Sanford

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
far from a Cygwin expert, I leave setting that part up to you, but if anyone's interested in the Declude-compatible client EXE, post back and let me know. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude worki ng for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
of the Cygwin layer. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMD client for IMail/Declude) available for download

2003-11-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
SPAMC32 -? for all the help you need to get this working with Declude, which is easy. The hard part for most of you will be setting up SPAMD; CYGWIN.TXT has some good pointers. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude worki ng for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
, exit code and all. -Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >