I'm trying to add a header to failed mail in the $default$.JunkMail file.
The lines I've added are:
WEIGHT20 HEADER FAILED WEIGHT TEST
WEIGHT20 ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The messages are being routed but without the header. What am I doing wrong?
I'm using Declude 1.81
---
I get the same Page cannot... with IE 6...
Looks like it might be down...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Maze
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 6:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail?
We've been experiencing intermittent mail problems with ALL the big guys
(MSN, YAHOO, HOTMAIL) over the past two months. It would appear that when
you get big enough you don't need to follow any rules.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff
Weve noticed our server delivering email to other accounts even though
its addressed to an invalid account.
Anyone know how to get Declude or Imail to check the TO: line against
the servers Imail address database?
Were using Imail 7.14 on a 2003 box and using the Imail user database.
OT, A little, any body got it going? I got it to display just the page
with the word GRAPH on it. Using Windows 2003.
Anyone know how to setup or how effective a comparison of the From: and
X-Declude-Sender: values would be in stopping SPAM? That is, if they do not
match, dump it.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
I'm still seeing mail bounced back for the above domains. It's not
consistent but I do see this message in my SMTP logs.
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated
companies do not
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220- authorize the use of its proprietary
computers and
Is anybody else having trouble with mail being returned from these domains.
The returned email shows no consistent errors and well over half the time
only reports that mail was undeliverable. It's not consistent, and does not
affect all addresses, but it is wide spread.
---
[This E-mail was
Off topic, maybe...
We are seeing the error Persistent Transient Failure on email returned to
other domains trying to email our user accounts. This is most frequently
with email from the domain worldnet.att.net. Just what is this failure?
Terry
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
This might be of use:
Here is a link to the full page with this information on it:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
bulletin/MS03-026.asp
Subject:
Fix for the RPC and NT Authority Shutdown
Body:
This is the Fix for the NT Authority Shutdown,
Running W2003 Enterprise Imail 7.15 with Declude 7.15i2 HJ, JM, V (all pro
versions) F-Prot. Runs like a Swiss watch (now that we figured out the bulk
of the Spool mess and added dedicated DNS servers). W2003 is Super Stable
for us. Still haven't pinpointed the remainder of the Spool issue but
16.04%
WEIGHT1010482 40.42%
WEIGHT5 769 2.97%
WORDFILTER 782630.18%
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry
Parks
Sent: Thursday, July
I'm here.
Terry
I was just thinking the same thing. Until yours the last message I got was
12:54PM yesterday.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
While it's quiet I'd like to know which system is best at reporting status
of the email system in terms of most messages sent from/delivered to
address, etc. I need a good summary reporting system that will email me
these results. I've tried delog but the email feature doesn't work.
Terry
---
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Parks
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Declude. JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System
While it's quiet I'd like to know which system is best at reporting status
of the email system in terms of most
Does the path to the text file need to be in quotes?
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?
Danny,
This is what I
Does anyone know if Declude works with other email server software besides
Imail?
Terry
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Surfside Internet]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
[NOTE: Your mail server [64.68.203.121] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet
hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will
cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.]
Anybody running Imail with Declude under Windows 2003?
My DNS servers show reverse DNS entries in the system. How do I test this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Parks
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:02 AM
To: Declude. Virus-owner; 'Declude. JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Parks
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:02 AM
To: Declude. Virus-owner; 'Declude. JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail + Declude in Windows 2003
[NOTE: Your mail server [64.68.203.121] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All
Internet hosts
..
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Parks
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:02 PM
To: Declude. Virus-owner; 'Declude. JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail + Declude in Windows 2003
[NOTE: Your mail server
Thanks for the info, finally got the command to turn it off should we decide
to do so. We've heard both sides of the issue with PIX and can't find the
definitive answer one-way or the other. What kinds of problems does having
this enabled produce? Our issue is with the enormous build up of the
Of Terry Parks
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail + Declude in Windows 2003
In addition to your list we're running Declude Hijack and F-Prot.
Can you send me your config and setup files so I can compare? I know there's
just something
] On Behalf Of Terry Parks
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail + Declude in Windows 2003
Thanks for the info, finally got the command to turn it off should we decide
to do so. We've heard both sides of the issue with PIX and can't find
Our Imail version 8.0 with hot fix 1 is holding email with embedded web
pages, but only those that are sent from legitimate sources. All the SPAM
web pages get through. The email being held up passes all SPAM testing and
virus testing according to the Declude logs. It just doesn't get delivered.
I'm getting that indication when I run the DNS report from dnsreport.com.
I'm running Imail 8.0 does anybody know how to fix this?
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anybody have documentation on how to interpret the displayed information
from DECCON?
Terry
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
Terry here,
Now I am lost...should the fix-up protocol be used or not? If not, how is it
turned off?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rifat Levis
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco
protocol for smtp
And all your problems will be over .
Rifat
- Original Message -
From: Terry Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cisco Pix firewall fixup
Terry here,
Now I am lost...should the fix-up protocol
For those considering upgrade to MS Windows 2003 I strongly recommend
setting the phantom heap to 2048 in the system registry as follows:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\
SubSystems\
The default entry is SharedSection=1024,3072,2048(Default 512). After making
you please elaborate on why this should be done, and if this setting is
an all recommendation or something specific to imail/declude
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Parks
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
instead of f-prot.exe. This will allow you to take
advantage of the 32bit version of F-Prot instead of the 16bit version. If
you are running the DOS version, I would recommend upgrading to the Windows
version.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Terry Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
It is indeed the 0xC142 in both cases.
Exact error messages are:
Using f-prot.exe command on SCANFILE line of virus.cfg file
NTVDM.exe - Application error: The application failed to initialize
properly (0xC142). Click on OK to terminate the application.
Using fpcmd.exe command on
Closer investigation found the correct entry under
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\
SubSystems\
The default entry is SharedSection=1024,3072,512. I changed the 512 to 2048
and rebooted the server. Now watching for errors.
Terry
-Original Message-
From:
We're running Imail Version 8.0 with Hot Fix 1 and Declude Anti-virus
(F-PROT), Anti-SPAM, HIJACK on a Windows 2003 Enterprise Server with dual
CPU, 2GB of RAM and RAID 5. After running for over six hours we're seeing
NTVDM.EXE - The Application failed to initialize properly (0xc142)
click on
35 matches
Mail list logo
