Re: [Declude.JunkMail] abused whitelist?

Hi, I think you're sending this to the wrong place. Who/what company are you looking for? Thanks, Andrew Baldwin an...@thumpernet.com an...@thumpernet.com 315-277-0685 Monday, October 22, 2012, 2:54:29 PM, you wrote: IA IA IA IA IA IA Hi, IA IA IA IA IA IA We have a client that is getting

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] abused whitelist?

forums DC years ago, which effectively killed the list. DC Darin. DC -Original Message- DC From: andyb@thumpernet DC Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 6:03 PM DC To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com DC Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] abused whitelist? DC Hi, DC I think you're sending

re: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: [049-0F7F8DF6-BE66] Invalid ZIP Vulnerability Detected - for no apparent reason

David, This email was sent to the wrong Andy... Thanks, Andy Baldwin From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:09 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: [049-0F7F8DF6-BE66] Invalid ZIP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New test

interested thanks, andy - Original Message - From: Bud Durland To: Declude List Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:58 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New test I am testing a small external test program. A message fails the test if there is an discernable IP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting SPF

Scott, Is PREWHITELIST explained somewhere in more detail? Thanks, Andy Thumpernet - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 7:43 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting SPF I'm getting a lot of fails in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

I use OpenSRS - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 2:04 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation I use BulkRegister.com John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

OpenSRS is $10/yr - Original Message - From: Michael Graveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 8:11 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation We use DirectNic - $15.00 per year/domain. Easy to administer all you

[Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

HI, I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of HABEAS... Here are the headers. These emails are definately spam. Looks like HABEAS has been compromised? Comments Please. thanks, Andy Received: from cs78191007.pp.htv.fi [62.78.191.7] by thumpernet.com (SMTPD32-6.06) id

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

because they warranted it to be spam free... Email headers can and do get forged all the time. I have recently sent them a letter and a lot of porno and spam email for them to review.. ~Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb Sent

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

I have been reporting as they come up. Thanks, Andy - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of HABEAS...

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

WHITELIST on any easily forged text, including the Habeas warrant. Check the archive in the last few days for this list for more discussion and sample configurations that have shared. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: andyb [mailto:[EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] undeliverable email

Hi, When my customers send email that is undeliverable, a lot of the returned undeliverable messages are being caught as spam. Any suggestions for changes that will allow it will go through? failing SPAMHEADERS and BADHEADERS, IPNOTINMX, WEIGHT10 (action HOLD) Thanks, Andy --- [This E-mail

[Declude.JunkMail] email blocking

HI, Is there a way to block email from a specific email address, or only one of my customers? Thanks, Andy

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

I think WOT could be very worth while for the 10-15 minutes it takes to setup. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust Scott, I looked into this several

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] email blocking

Title: Message Is there any way to get this to only log hits? It is logging everything now, from what I can see. I've read the on-line doc, in one place it says it assigns a 1, 100or a 0 for declude. I'm not sure how it is working with the weighting system... I just need to simply

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

Well, Your try it if it doesn't work, or gets abused, you get rid of it.. It just *might* help. - Original Message - From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:27 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust I'm with Todd

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

That is way too broad and general a statement. My server doesn't NOT allow most spam to pass. I would think most mail admins that would take advantage of WOT would already have their servers setup so they would pass most spam tests anyways. Why whitelist senders that wouldn't have failed

[Declude.JunkMail] MONKEYFORMMAIL, MONKEYPROXIES

Hi, I noticed this test in my config file, but there are no longer in the Declude default config files... Are they still valid tests? Thanks, Andy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

[Declude.JunkMail] HOLD and WARN

Hi, I'm using SPAMCOP as part of the weighting system and as a HOLD action by itself. Because of this, In spamreview it shows a total WEIGHT but SPAMCOP isn't listed, though I know it added to the WEIGHT because of the spamlog. I take it that's just how it is? IS there a way to have it show in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sniffer

. Bill - Original Message - From: andyb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:36 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] sniffer Is sniffer worth the $300/year? Thinking about trying it. Thanks, andy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

[Declude.JunkMail] can this be done?

Hi, Can I make a test (like SPAMCOP) be included in the weighting system, but also be a HOLD action by itself? So, if it fails SPAMCOP it will be held, but if the total wieght exceeds the DELETE threshold, it will be deleted. Thanks, Andy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] can this be done?

Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 9:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] can this be done? Hi, Can I make a test (like SPAMCOP) be included in the weighting system, but also be a HOLD

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version / Internmediate Policy

All this conversation about betas/releases, etc. Scott, you have the patience of a saint at times. Do what you think is best. You can never keep everyone happy all the time. Andy - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November

[Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

Hi, I have one customer that has a virtual domain. Even though this [EMAIL PROTECTED] is receiving email that exceeds my DELETE threshold, the messagages are only being HELD. Any idea why this is happening? I don't have any special rules setup for this customer under Declude that I can find.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

] On Behalf Of andyb Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 8:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting Hi, I have one customer that has a virtual domain. Even though this [EMAIL PROTECTED] is receiving email that exceeds my DELETE threshold

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

Yes, they correspond. I checked the name, Q8b540ec.SMD, etc. Same in both spam review and the log file. That's how I found the specific log file entry. This is only happening for this one email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Andy - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

In $junkmail$.junkmail I have WEIGHT10HOLD WEIGHT20DELETE All of the other tests are WARN. In Global.cfg all tests are WARN. Is that correct? Still, the issue seems to be confined to this one [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Andy - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

I'm looking at Weight of 18 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10. It it is 18, it also exceeds 14, the limit I delete at Thanks, andy - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 2:29 PM Subject: RE:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

1.76i6 I'm only running one email server. Do you want me to send me my config files ( I do have a support contract). Thank, Andy - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 2:37 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

I have the weight10 set to HOLD at 7 weight20 test set to DELETE at 14 weight10 and weight20 are just labels, that's all - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 2:39 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

Hi, I sent the config files ot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, andy - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting 1.76i6 I'm only running one email

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

the rest of the log and your config files and adding up the math manually? Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: andyb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting I'm looking at Weight of 18

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting

Ok, But there is only one email server...I think the weird thing is that of the 20 virtual domains and 500 or so email boxes, this is only happening for this *one* email address Did you see anything else wrong in my config files? Thanks, andy - Original Message - From: R. Scott

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] %TESTSFAILED%

Would anyone care to post an example so I can see the math? I still don't get how to use IPNOTINMX properly. Thanks, andy - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 1:24 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BODY STARTSWITH

Scott, Is there a summary of the new tests, what they do and how to use them? It's almost like there needs to be class to go to, for setting up filters. Today I discovered that some of the adjustments I've made to config files were catching legitimate list serv mailand so it goes. Is there

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...

Thanks everyone, I have it working. It was also necessary to go to the $defualt$.junkmail config file and add MYFILTER WARN so I could see the results in spam review. Thanks, Andy

[Declude.JunkMail] one more try...

Hi all, I've asked a couple of times over the past couple of weeks, but thought I'd ask one more time... I get a lot of spam with return addresses that start with b. ie: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there anyway to filter that in declude or in the Imail kill list? Thanks, Andy --- [This E-mail was

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...

try... Filter file. MAILFROM (weighttoadd) STARTSWITH b. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:53 PM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...

So, the line MYFILTER filter C:\IMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x x 5 0 should have 2 x's because of the 2 tiered weighting system I'm using? Thanks, Andy - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:13 PM Subject:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] false positives

Scott.. Wow, that changes a lot. I knew something was going on with Verisign. Is there a technical description somewhere of what they did so I can catch up? Do you have new default config files listed on your website that incorporate the latest changes needed. Once again, the support of the

[Declude.JunkMail] getting bombed?

Title: eBay - scam.. Is everyone getting bombed by spam, or is it just me? CPU usage was at 100%, caused by multiple declude.exe processes running. I rebooted, cleared the queue and it seems to be OK now. Never had any issues until a couple of days ago. Andy - Original Message

[Declude.JunkMail] whitelist

How do I white list all of my IP addresses? The line I had in there is not working. thanks, andy

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review

Can you give me the syntax for that? - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:37 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review How do I get the Weight: to show? Andy, It's not the answer but maybe this

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review

Yes, that part I already have. But I already have WEIGHT10 HOLD and WEIGHT20 DELETE What is the syntax for getting the weight in the subject line? thanks, andy - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:08 PM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] log entry question

a couple of weeks earlier. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andyb Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] log entry question In the log file, what does this mean

[Declude.JunkMail] yahoo as spam

Hi, I have a customer, she is sending email from her yahoo account to her email address here. It is being caught as spam, as per included log entries. Good ole yahoo, not RFC compliant as the postmaster and abuse email addresses. I have also included my config files. This config has

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] yahoo as spam

] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] yahoo as spam Hi, I have a customer, she is sending email from her yahoo account to her email address here. It is being caught as spam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamcheck

What's the difference between spamcheck and declude? - Original Message - From: Frederick P. Squib, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 7:47 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamcheck Tom, http://www.riedmann.it/spamchk/ Been using it for a

[Declude.JunkMail] MSN

Hi, MSN is not accepting email from my mail server, here is what the log file entries look like: 20030312 001347 127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) Trying msn.com (0) 20030312 001347 127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) Connect msn.com [207.46.181.13:25] (1) 20030312 001347 127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) 20030312

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MSN

test utility, and it didn't come through at all on his @microsoft.com address. He sent it through @hotmail.com and it did arrive. Several other messages from him arrived AFTER we had finished the case. Glenn Z. - Original Message - From: andyb

[Declude.JunkMail] single user exclusion

Hi, I'm sure this has been answered before... How do I exclude one user from the spam filter? If you could head me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it. thanks, Andrew --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] single user exclusion

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of andyb Sent: 15 January 2003 17:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] single user exclusion Hi, I'm sure this has been answered before... How do I exclude one user from the spam filter? If you could head

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] change HOLD location

That is a bummer, I'm using xcopy to backup files from one computer to another, and the hold directly can have as many as 3000 messages over the weekend (which is big plug for the effectiveness of declude) thanks, andy - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: