On 3 Nov 2004 at 19:37, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Question - with your new 'e' switch - can the weight returned be
capped eg a max return value?
Nope, not as currently implemented.
Come to think of it, though, I think I will add this in just for you.
:) What the heck? I'll repost
On 2 Nov 2004 at 21:07, Eric Krichbaum wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SpamdOnWindows
I am using cygwin
Directions still worked fine for me with 3.0.1
Well I'm happy for you :)
I'll fiddle and get it - its good to know that it does work without
issue -
THanks
-Nick
At
On 1 Nov 2004 at 19:08, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Sandy,
I have this working with SA 3.01 very nice..!
Question - with your new 'e' switch - can the weight returned be
capped eg a max return value?
-Nick
All,
SPAMC32 has been updated to more easily function as a weight test in
addition
Question - with your new 'e' switch - can the weight returned be
capped eg a max return value?
Nope, not as currently implemented.
You can use multiple sets of -lt and -ht switches to create similar
behavior, possibly including negative weights and TESTSFAILED filters
to strike a
On 1 Nov 2004 at 19:08, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Sandy,
Dunno what I did but in moving to SA 3x from 2.61 I cannot get spamd
to run. Any ideas? The error is
can't execute /user/bin/spamd..
THanks!
-Nick Hayer
All,
SPAMC32 has been updated to more easily function as a weight test in
Dunno what I did but in moving to SA 3x from 2.61 I cannot get spamd
to run. Any ideas? The error is can't execute /user/bin/spamd..
That path looks a little out-of-the-ordinary, that's for sure. Is
there a 'spamd' in that path? Is that the only error?
--Sandy
On 2 Nov 2004 at 17:56, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
On 2 Nov 2004 at 17:56, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Yes that is the only error and yes 'spamd' is in the path. I noticed spamd
is like 73k and the old ver was ~ 53k.
Cygwin seems fine - its just afer I did the SA install things broke
so I'm wondering
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SpamdOnWindows
Directions still worked fine for me with 3.0.1
At 07:10 PM 11/2/2004, you wrote:
On 2 Nov 2004 at 17:56, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
On 2 Nov 2004 at 17:56, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Yes that is the only error and yes 'spamd' is in the path. I noticed
All,
SPAMC32 has been updated to more easily function as a weight test in
addition to the other command-line threshold options. See the release
notes below and download from the traditional /release folder.
--Sandy
--
SPAMC32 Release 0.5.56
11/1/2004
