I have been running these tests for a while (as well as other that were
producing little or not results), and they have been producing good results
for me. However, my philosophy is different from some others on this list
in that I like to test lots of IP4R and RHSBL databases and apply
-Nick Hayer
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[Declude.JunkMail] Additional IP4R RHSBL tests
Date sent: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:21:45 -0800
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been
- Original Message -
From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Additional IP4R RHSBL tests
Bill,
Thanks for this additl list. I too agree to run lots of tests scored
low
sooo here are two more
I just wanted to provide a list of some of the test sites that do not
appear on Scott's site yet.
FYI, we list *all* known spam databases at
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/support/ip4r.htm .
However, since most spam databases are run by individuals and small
organizations, and often know
Also, since all DNS based tests get spanned simultaneously (rather than
consecutively), there is no performance nor latency hit (unless one of the
test sites is not responding - Scott, are you still planning to add a
configurable time-out setting for the DNS based tests?).
Yes, that is still
