RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-19 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Ave. W. Kitchener, ON N2M 1L2 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 4:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results If you want IMail to do these tests

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-19 Thread Bill Landry
to Declude. Bill - Original Message - From: Harry Vanderzand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 5:43 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results Is it possible to have declude do a test on the following: HEADERS 20 CONTAINS X-IMAIL-SPAM

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-19 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Yep, but it's still a shame that we cannot track this header and add weight with JM when it's found because of this. You're right; that's where stock needs to be placed in Sniffer, CyberSitter, and perhaps Declude's upcoming prob tests. -Sandy

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread Markus Gufler
Hi all, Over the weekend I've configured the following ip4r-tests from Bill.B's config file that we haven't used until now. This are the results after 10 hours (4 hours business time) In this time we've catched around 300 spam messages. BLITZEDALL ip4r opm.blitzed.org * 3 0 95 positive test

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread Serge
* 3 0 - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:14 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results Hi all, Over the weekend I've configured the following ip4r-tests from Bill.B's config file

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread Bill Landry
to everyone. Bill - Original Message - From: Serge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:50 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results Thanks for the valuable info are all the test below free and can be used by all of us ? and, if yes, why

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
sbl.spamhaus.org* 3 0 - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:14 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results Hi all, Over the weekend I've configured the following ip4r-tests from Bill.B's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results

2003-06-16 Thread Bill Landry
: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:38 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results All of those tests are free. The ones you list have just been added to the default configuration files, except for IPWHOIS (which has a lot of false