Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/SpamAssasin Question

2004-06-24 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I installed but can't see anything in the declude logs for it. Try running at log level debug for a little while to see verbose output. Also make sure you can run SPAMC32 from the command line against an existing D file (in your \spool\spam, for example) using the same syntax you

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/SpamAssasin Question

2004-06-24 Thread Chris Patterson
Would it make a difference if the spool is g:/imail/spool ? Thanks, Chris Patterson, CCNA Network Engineer -Original Message- From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 1:59 AM To: Chris Patterson Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/SpamAssasin Question

2004-06-24 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Would it make a difference if the spool is g:/imail/spool ? Nope. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude/SpamAssasin Question

2004-06-22 Thread Chris Patterson
Can anyone with SpamAssasin plugged into declude give me their global.cfg excerpt? I hold on 15, I am unsure on the cw and sw weight. Also, how do you weigh this test compared to your hold weight? SPAMASSASSIN external nonzero c:\imail\declude\spamc32.exe -cw %WEIGHT% -sw 10 -f

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/SpamAssasin Question

2004-06-22 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I hold on 15, I am unsure on the cw and sw weight. You can't change the current weight; that syntax ('-cw %WEIGHT%') is just the way you pass the current weight at the time the test is run. The skip weight is used to reduce processing. The maximum, and traditional, skip weight