FYI...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:23 AM
Subject: NJABL changes for contributors


> It's recently come to my attention that some contributing sites may be
> running content filtering software (i.e. SpamAsssassin) on servers setup
> as DNS query contributors.  Since recent versions of SpamAsssassin check
> IPs in more than just the last Received: header line against
> dnsbl.njabl.org, this was causing workstations and intermediate servers
> (systems that may never have talked directly to contributing servers) to
> be tested, which has generated some rather nasty complaints about NJABL.
>
> In order to solve this problem, two new zones have been setup:
> qwdnsbl.njabl.org
> qwdynablock.njabl.org
>
> qw = query watching
>
> These zones are 100% identical to dnsbl.njabl.org and dynablock.njabl.org.
> They've been setup so that contributing servers can have their MTA's setup
> to query qwdnsbl.njabl.org and qwdynablock.njabl.org, while content
> filters, such as SpamAssassin, should continue to use dnsbl.njabl.org and
> dynablock.njabl.org.
>
> If you are running a contributing server, your queries are no longer being
> watched unless they are for qwdnsbl.njabl.org or qwdynablock.njabl.org.
> Please update your MTA's to use these zones.
>
> If you have not coordinated with us to become a "newer method" i.e. query
> watching contributing server, this message does not apply to you.  Sending
> queries for the qw zones will not get your queries watched unless we are
> already looking for queries from your IP.
>
> If you are not currently a contributor, and run a site that handles a
> large amount of email or gets unusually high volumes of spam, please have
> a look at the following pages
>
> http://njabl.org/contribute.html
> http://njabl.org/method.html
>
> and consider becoming a query watching contributor.  We currently appear
> to have more than 30,000 systems using NJABL, but only a few dozen systems
> setup as query watching contributors...and until/unless those sites update
> their configs to use the qw zones, we're down to just a handful of
> contributors who've already been notified and have updated.
>
> For anyone unaware, dynablock.njabl.org is a new subzone created earlier
> this month.  On Dec 1, 2003, the maintainer of dynablock.easynet.nl shut
> down his DNSBL of dynamic IP spaces.  His list was a very comprehensive
> (far more comprehensive than NJABL's dynamic IP listings) dynamic IP
> DNSBL.  Some people considered it too aggressive (too likely to generate
> false positives), so rather than import it into dnsbl.njabl.org, it was
> added as a separate sub-zone so that those who wanted to use it could, and
> those who did not, would not have it forced upon them.
>
> http://njabl.org/dynablock.html
>
> Please remember, this is a moderated announcement list.  If you wish to
> respond to any of this, do not bother trying to send it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the sender instead.
>
>

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to