RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting test results

2003-03-25 Thread Madscientist
| What we are doing is to track the 2000 (user configurable) | most recent spammer | IP addresses. The list is maintained as an MRU style list | (sorted with the | most recent at the top). If incoming messages reach a user | defined score, the | IP address of the spammer is added to the list.

[Declude.JunkMail] Interesting test results

2003-03-24 Thread brian
Hi Scott and all, We added a test to SpamManager that has produced some really interesting results. What we are doing is to track the 2000 (user configurable) most recent spammer IP addresses. The list is maintained as an MRU style list (sorted with the most recent at the top). If incoming

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting test results

2003-03-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
Here is what we found. After about 3 weeks of data collection, only about 1 in 400 incoming spams is identified by a DNS lookup, and NOT on the list of the 2000 most recent spammers. That is quite impressive. I was thinking that it would probably be a relatively simple matter to add such a test

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting test results

2003-03-24 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
I was thinking that it would probably be a relatively simple matter to add such a test in a future version of declude. If an incoming message reached a certain weight, it could be added to a recent spammer list. This list could be checked along with other internal tests _before_ DNS tests are

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting test results

2003-03-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
SPThat sounds like an excellent idea -- I'm going to investigate to see SPwhether this may be possible or not. Circumventing the DNS lookups would SPbe very useful. Mr. Obvious here... the same technique could be used in the negative to pass through frequent mail from *low* scoring servers. That