[Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases

2004-08-23 Thread Dean Lawrence
There are a number of references on this list to interim releases to Declude. How do you get the interim releases? If I run declude.exe -diag, it shows version 1.79. I downloaded the beta again from the manual page and it says the same thing. Thanks, __

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases

2004-08-23 Thread Dermot Keenan
http://www.declude.com/version/interim/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dean Lawrence Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases There are a number of references on this list

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases

2004-08-23 Thread Dean Lawrence
Thanks Dermot! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dermot Keenan Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases http://www.declude.com/version/interim/ -Original Message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases

2004-08-23 Thread Scott Fisher
/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dean Lawrence Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases There are a number of references on this list to interim releases to Declude. How do you get

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases

2004-08-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
There are a number of references on this list to interim releases to Declude. How do you get the interim releases? I guess you haven't been reading my responses. :) If I run declude.exe -diag, it shows version 1.79. I downloaded the beta again from the manual page and it says the same thing.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases

2004-08-23 Thread Dean Lawrence
really work properly until the 1.79i7 release. Dean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases Scott Perry would also remind

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases

2004-08-23 Thread Dean Lawrence
Thanks Scott. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases There are a number of references on this list to interim releases

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases

2004-08-23 Thread Scott Fisher
] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases Scott Perry would also remind that you need a paid up maintenance contract to download new versions. I believe the latest interim is 1.79i16 from July 23rd. Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/23/04 01:09PM http

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases - A Suggestion

2003-12-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
Scott: You can't fault people. With the last few betas it seemed as if the original beta was quickly replaced with a follow-up interims release before the new features really worked reliably. (A common scenario was oh, yeah, we know that's broken, go download the interims release.) I understand

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases - A Suggestion

2003-12-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
You can't fault people. With the last few betas it seemed as if the original beta was quickly replaced with a follow-up interims release before the new features really worked reliably. (A common scenario was oh, yeah, we know that's broken, go download the interims release.) And that was part of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases - A Suggestion

2003-12-12 Thread Fritz Squib
Scott, Just a suggestion, and it wouldn't be too much work, why not just distribute the special interim release in a password protected zip file when someone needs a quick fix? General interim release to fix a known bug (for everyone running a beta) would not be zipped. Just my two cents.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases - A Suggestion

2003-12-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
Just a suggestion, and it wouldn't be too much work, why not just distribute the special interim release in a password protected zip file when someone needs a quick fix? We may well need to do that. Or perhaps just a random URL that isn't easily guessable.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases - A Suggestion

2003-12-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
We may well need to do that. Or perhaps just a random URL that isn't easily guessable. Yes Scott, I think that's necessary. The current method is pretty dangerous - let's take a real case from the last beta. If I remember I ultimately ended up having to use i18 to address various issues

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Releases - A Suggestion

2003-12-12 Thread paul
Just a suggestion, and it wouldn't be too much work, why not just distribute the special interim release in a password protected zip file when someone needs a quick fix? We may well need to do that. Or perhaps just a random URL that isn't easily guessable. Well, I've seen from posts here