Scott,
FYI, in testing I found that the %WEIGHT% is being passed in, however
it seems to be 500 points higher than in reality, with all the weights
showing up as being between 500 and 600 over the space of my test.
Thanks,
Matt
Matt wrote:
Scott,
I've been playing with this for
Thanks :)
R. Scott Perry wrote:
FYI, in testing I found that the %WEIGHT% is being passed in, however
it seems to be 500 points higher than in reality, with all the
weights showing up as being between 500 and 600 over the space of my
test.
There is a new interim 1.79i4 that fixes this.
Cheer up :)
No problem. Just wondered about the 8 minutes. :-)
I know that in Declude we have a great tool and I can't have it 100% as I
want.
Hope your external test will work fine and you can add additional tests.
As we check for message sizes in SpamChk for over a year now maybe I can
On 7 Apr 2004 at 17:20, R. Scott Perry wrote:
There is now an interim 1.79i3 at http://www.declude.com/interim that
changes the %WEIGHT% variable so that it will include the current
weight if it is used before the total weight is calculated.
Scott,
For me this is what makes me so loyal to
Markus,
Thanks for the stats. I've actually been keeping copies of all of the
false positives that we are reprocessing since Monday. Here's a break
down by the sender (considering that some newsletters and ads are sent
to multiple recipients and that throws off the numbers):
1 - 0.5 KB
1 -
I'm still having one problem with the script to detect message sizes.
The %WEIGHT% is supposed to be passed into the script so that it can
decide whether or not to fully run or immediately quit, but I can't get
it to quit. Although this isn't critical for this one script, it is
definitely
The %WEIGHT% is supposed to be passed into the script so that it can
decide whether or not to fully run or immediately quit, but I can't get it
to quit. Although this isn't critical for this one script, it is
definitely the main component of the Sniffer bypassed that I would like to
also put
The problem here is that the %WEIGHT% variable isn't calculated
until after all the tests are run.
That's too bad, as that means that the -cw (current weight) and -sw
(skip-if weight) switches in SPAMC32 aren't usable.
Since SKIPIFWEIGHT exists as an internal directive, can you look
Scott,
...and all this time I was banking on this being possible.
Is there another variable available like %CURRENTWEIGHT% that could be
used for this purpose (whatever SKIPIFWEIGHT uses)? I recall Sandy
releasing a SpamD port back in January that included at least the hooks
for this, but I
Is there another variable available like %CURRENTWEIGHT% that could be
used for this purpose (whatever SKIPIFWEIGHT uses)?
There is now an interim 1.79i3 at http://www.declude.com/interim that
changes the %WEIGHT% variable so that it will include the current weight if
it is used before the
There is now an interim 1.79i3 at http://www.declude.com/interim
that changes the %WEIGHT% variable so that it will include the
current weight if it is used before the total weight is calculated.
Thanks! Now all SPAMC32 features can be used in the real world. :)
--Sandy
There is now an interim 1.79i3 at
WOW!
I have to analyze Matt's and Sanford's messages/spelling/psycology.
How the hell it's possible to have such a fast reaction (8 minutes!!!) for
such a request?
No doubt, support issues are resolved very fast. Also realy important things
like EZIP. This is
Did you send Scott a Christmas card?
:)
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Passing weight to Externalplus test
How the hell it's possible to have such a fast reaction (8
minutes!!!) for such a request?
Ah, but to be fair, SPAMC32 has implemented that feature for a few
months now without matching functionality. :)
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief
Markus,
Just to be fair, I have mentioned or asked for a lot of different
things that have not been introduced into Declude. Clearly by the
speed of this modification, it was a very minor change to the
environment, essentially exposing data that wasn't previously exposed
in this way, but
Scott,
I've been playing with this for a bit now and it seems that the weight
isn't being passed as %WEIGHT%, or maybe it is strangely formatted.
My script now uses two values, the first being the current weight in
Declude, and the second being the SKIPIFWEIGHT equivalent. The
following line
16 matches
Mail list logo
