[Declude.JunkMail] Trying SpamChk...and weights...

2003-12-03 Thread Todd Ryan
Hi all, All of the recent talk about SpamChk has finally prompted me to give it a spin. Per the documentation, I am considering change my weight scale. That is, I normally hold on 10 and delete on 25. Of course, my per-test weights are adjusted accordingly. I am thinking about doing what

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying SpamChk...and weights...

2003-12-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
does anyone see any problems with weights potentially being in the -1000 to 1000+ ranges? Obviously, it's all relative to my tests, but I'm more curious about how JunkMail is designed and if there would be any problems with much larger values. No, there won't be any problems. You should be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying SpamChk...and weights...

2003-12-03 Thread Markus Gufler
... does anyone see any problems with weights potentially being in the -1000 to 1000+ ranges? We use the hold-on-100 weighting system and have daily hold spam messages between 100 and 1200 points Also, I don't suppose there's a way to set up spamchk so that it does not add any