[Declude.JunkMail] UNKNOWN entries in spf.log

2003-12-23 Thread Bill Landry
Scott, just and FYI. Like Andy, I am still see a few UNKNOWN entries in the spf.log file, rather than just PASS FAIL entries. I am running Declude v1.77i8. Here are a few samples from today: 64.94.104.161[EMAIL PROTECTED] [sm1.mail.cooking.com]: UNKNOWN: v=spf1 ptr ?all 211.243.120.160

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] UNKNOWN entries in spf.log

2003-12-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
64.94.104.161[EMAIL PROTECTED] [sm1.mail.cooking.com]: UNKNOWN: v=spf1 ptr ?all This one should return an UNKNOWN -- the PTR for 64.94.104.161 doesn't contain email.cooking.com, so it defaults to the ?all, returning an UNKNOWN response. 211.243.120.160 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [cn.ca]: UNKNOWN:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] UNKNOWN entries in spf.log

2003-12-23 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] This, too, ends up going with the default ?all, producing the UNKNOWN response. The spf.log file is used when a domain has an SPF string; the spf.none is used when there is no SPF string for the domain. Ah, okay, this

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] UNKNOWN entries in spf.log

2003-12-23 Thread Andy Schmidt
] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] UNKNOWN entries in spf.log Scott, just and FYI. Like Andy, I am still see a few UNKNOWN entries in the spf.log file, rather than just PASS FAIL entries. I am running Declude v1.77i8. Here are a few samples from today: 64.94.104.161[EMAIL PROTECTED] [sm1