[Declude.JunkMail] Update of SpamReview web app (not related to SpamReview hold manager)

2002-10-30 Thread Charles Frolick
Ok, I just uploaded a new revision to my Spambox App. The URL is http://spamreview.argolink.net email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass is demo Info at http://spamreview.argolink.net/doc It now has full capability to manage settings per user. A few more issues to resolve and I will look at packaging it

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of SpamReview web app (not related to SpamReview hold manager)

2002-10-30 Thread Bill Landry
Chuck, looks pretty cool to me, and I can see how this could be a nice way for customers to manage their own spam rules. However, I wonder what the effective load would be on an IMail/Declude JunkMail server with a large customer base with all of the per-user files that would be required to make

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of SpamReview web app (not related to SpamReview hold manager)

2002-10-30 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
So it wouldn't work for the 6085accounts on my default host. :-) Glenn Z. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:32 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of SpamReview web app (not related

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of SpamReview web app (not related to SpamReview hold manager)

2002-10-30 Thread Avolve Support
Really, 500 wouldn't be an abnormal number for a domain. -- Original Message -- From: Glenn \\ WCNet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:38:49 -0600 So it wouldn't work for the 6085 accounts on my default host. :-)