If SA returns a score of 15, will the return code be set to 8 (or
whatever the value of -et) or will it just not count it as spam?
Let's try this again: if you're using -e and -et, there's no it
counting anything as spam. You're passing the SA weight (or the -et
value, if the SA
I just wanted to personally thank David Barker for all of his help last
night with server queue issues we had...
Sincerely,
Randy Armbrecht
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-346-5300 x112
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112
http://globalweb.net
Global Web Solutions is a registered trademark of Global Web
]: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
I just wanted to personally thank David Barker for all of his help last
night with server queue issues we had...
Sincerely,
Randy Armbrecht
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-346-5300 x112
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112
http://globalweb.net
Global Web Solutions
'returnvalue' would be better written returnvalue, i.e. it's a
variable -- the the return value you're watching for. But you don't
want an 'external retunvalue' type. You want an 'external weight'
type.
I couldn't get 'external weight' to work, am I missing something?
I couldn't get 'external weight' to work, am I missing something?
SPAMASSASSIN external weight e:\imail\declude\spamd\spamc32.exe -d
209.215.97.193 -e -et 6 -f 4 0
Don't assign Declude weights to 'external weight' tests. The weight
comes from the external test's result code. Stop the
I can't find documentation with regards to how to use a remove spamassassin
server as an external test in declude v 1.81. Any help will be much
appreciated.
Thanks!
Travis
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:21 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
I can't find documentation with regards to how
, September 20, 2005 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Travis not sure what you are asking with how to use a remove :)
1. To remove the external test just # comment out the test in your
global.cfg
2. To use spamassassin I would suggest using this plugin SPAMC32
http
@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Travis not sure what you are asking with how to use a remove :)
1. To remove the external test just # comment out the test in your
global.cfg
2. To use spamassassin I would suggest using
: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Hi Travis -
Sandy's plugin does the 'somehow' part. Simply have it point to your
spamd.
Here is the line from my global.cfg that may help -
EXTERNAL.SPAMASSASSIN_v3.04externalNONZERO
e:\imail\declude\spamd\spamc32.exe -D -d 12.152.254.3
I have spamassasin running on my unix servers. I want to use this as
an external test for my imail/declude system as an external test.
A Declude external test uses filtering logic outside Declude: it sends
raw envelope and/or header data to a separate filtering system from
Declude and
]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Hi Travis -
Sandy's plugin does the 'somehow' part. Simply have it point to your
spamd.
Here is the line from my global.cfg that may help -
EXTERNAL.SPAMASSASSIN_v3.04
SPAMASSASSINexternalnonzero c:\imail\declude\spamc32.exe -cw
%WEIGHT% -sw 10 -f choose a weight 0
-f is supposed to be the filename... but the example doesn't give one. So,
how does spamc send a file name to spamd?
Travis
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
Travis Sullivan wrote:
SPAMASSASSINexternalnonzero c:\imail\declude\spamc32.exe
-cw %WEIGHT% -sw 10 -f choose a weight 0
-f is supposed to be the filename... but the example doesn't give
one. So, how does spamc send a file name to spamd?
Declude hands it off to it. Actually I
Thanks guys, I have it working now! BTW... any way to retrieve any info
from SA with regards to test failed or weight?
This is what I have in my logs:
Msg failed SPAMASSASSIN (Message failed SPAMASSASSIN: 1.). Action=WARN
All I have is a 1, that is the score I have set as the test weight, for
Thanks guys, I have it working now! BTW... any way to retrieve any
info from SA with regards to test failed or weight?
This info is not currently used by Declude, though it is accessible
when you run SPAMC32 against a message from the command line. Declude
Junkmail doesn't support the use
Anyway, the next version of SPAMC32 is coming out very soon with the
ability to consult a local SPAMC32 log file (rather than the main
SPAMD log file) to check which individual SA rules failed for each
message; this is a definite need.
Thanks Sandy, I just wanted to make sure I
Sandy,
The latest Declude's support bitmasked result codes. You might
consider creating a user maintained map from tests failed in SA to
bitmapped result codes returned to Declude. I'm not sure what the
limit might be in Declude for the number of unique tests, but I have
managed to use 16 so
Travis Sullivan wrote:
So, the only thing I will see in the headers is the total score SA
results:
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMASSASSIN: Message failed SPAMASSASSIN: 3.
And declude scores only for the test group, like other tests in the
global.cfg file?
Correct. Very slick huh? And good job
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 5:44 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Travis Sullivan wrote:
So, the only thing I will see in the headers is the total score SA
results:
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMASSASSIN: Message
Anyway, the next version of SPAMC32 is coming out very soon with the
ability to consult a local SPAMC32 log file (rather than the main
SPAMD log file) to check which individual SA rules failed for each
message; this is a definite need.
Hi Sandy,
Well since you are working on the
Nick,
If you don't mind, is SA heavy on the CPU? What kinda load are
you running with SA?
I have 3k plus users getting 300k emails per day... my SA is running on a
linux server, P4 2ghz... no increase in load when I started using SA with
declude today.
The best config I have set is:
Hi Keith,
Keith Johnson wrote:
Nick,
If you don't mind, is SA heavy on the CPU? What kinda load are
you running with SA?
First I am no authority here but am willing to share my experience.
Sandy's spamd32 seems to be no issue as near as I can tell. The cpu
issue is with spamd. .I
Well since you are working on the code - something that for me would
be nice is a modification to your -e switch. What I would like to
have happen is return the SA weight only after a threshold is met.
For example with a setting of 5 an email of 4.99 would not be
considered spam
for our three servers.
Thanks again,
Keith
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Travis Sullivan
Sent: Tue 9/20/2005 6:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Nick,
If you don't mind, is SA heavy
The latest Declude's support bitmasked result codes. You might
consider creating a user maintained map from tests failed in SA to
bitmapped result codes returned to Declude. I'm not sure what the
limit might be in Declude for the number of unique tests, but I have
managed to use
I guess the speeds are much the same as quering a local DNS server
for lookups.
SA advocate though I am, I can't say that's the case. The speed of a
UDP DNS lookup is far faster than a SPAMC32/SPAMD TCP connection for
even a tiny message, due both to UDP vs. TCP differences and the
Sandy,
The utility in this is that the tests failed would be centralized in
one application, Delude, and available for combo tests and easier
diagnosis within that framework.
Of course SpamAssassin has a multitude of different tests and scores
within those tests, and it isn't practical to do
The best config I have set is:
SPAMASSASSIN externalnonzero
e:\imail\declude\spamd\spamc32.exe -d
209.215.97.193 -r -lt 4 -et 6 -f 3 0
I 'think' so far that spamassassin only reports if SA's score is 4 or
more,
if so, I score it a 3 on the email test. I am still playing with the
values
Of course SpamAssassin has a multitude of different tests and scores
within those tests, and it isn't practical to do everything in
bitmask fashion, but I could see some utility in separating out a
bayesian test as BAYESIAN-LOW, BAYESIAN-MED and BAYESIAN-HIGH for
instance, or
A few more tests later, I have found the SA results of 1 to be spam,
and my global.cfg line scores a hit at 3, this 3 gets added to the
result of SA's 1 and therefore I get 4 points.
There should be no _addition_ of Declude-defined weights to external
test result codes! I don't even know
Sandy;
There should be no _addition_ of Declude-defined weights to external
test result codes! I don't even know how your test definition could be
doing that. Certainly, that's not the intended use of SPAMC32.
Yes, another mistake on my part. Sorry :(
What's confusing you seems to be the
Can you point me to the manual please? :) I would like to see what
else can be done besides the nonzero (ham or spam). I would like to
rate how smelly the spam is :)
Take a look:
http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp
--Sandy
Sanford
Take a look:
http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp
Ah! I was thinking of your manual. Well, anyhow, I couldn't get the
'returnvalue' to work. only nonzero seams to work. any ideas?
I used the following without success:
SPAMASSASSIN externalreturnvalue
34 matches
Mail list logo
