[Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread Gufler Markus
Hi all, Anyone has experiences using a ramdrive for all declude exe, config and filter files? Markus --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread Omar K.
: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive? Hi all, Anyone has experiences using a ramdrive for all declude exe, config and filter files? Markus --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread Frederick Samarelli
] improved performance using ramdrive? Hi all, Anyone has experiences using a ramdrive for all declude exe, config and filter files? Markus --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread Matthew Bramble
Markus, Interesting idea. A quick search of Google turned up some of the same suspicious types :) http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg72969.html The following product looks like it might work well. It goes up to 4GB and has an auto-save feature.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Anyone has experiences using a ramdrive for all declude exe, config and filter files? It wouldn't help very much. The main reason is caching -- Windows will automatically cache frequently used files, so all of those files should be in memory already. If the spool directory was on a RAM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread Nick Hayer
now run - the dns tests take care of the load so cpu use is way down -Nick From: Frederick Samarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive? Date sent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
If the spool directory was on a RAM drive, though, it could speed things up quite a bit (the RFCs say this is not allowed, though), as the information constantly changes. Why would the RFCs care where the spool is? Performance wise, that would be a great use if you had the funds. John

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread Matthew Bramble
. -Original Message- From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive? If the spool directory was on a RAM drive, though, it could speed things up

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive? Some ramdrives autosave at configurable intervals. I see this as not being that much worse than enabling caching on a hard drive or array, although it probably doesn't make

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread Administration
-Nick NH From: Frederick Samarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] NH To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NH Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive? NH Date sent: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:44:37 -0500 NH Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I