Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
You are correct -- I'll see if I can get a new interim release online which will take care of this. There is a new interim release 1.79i7 at http://www.declude.com/version/interim . It takes care of the issue of the ALLRECIPS filter not working properly.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-13 Thread Russ Uhte \(Lists\)
At 11:00 AM 5/13/2004, R. Scott Perry wrote: You are correct -- I'll see if I can get a new interim release online which will take care of this. There is a new interim release 1.79i7 at http://www.declude.com/version/interim . It takes care of the issue of the ALLRECIPS filter not working

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-13 Thread Matt
Scott, Is this just for the ALLRECIPS bug, or does this also cover some other more recent and less serious ones like the combination subjects and the addition of the NOTCONTAINS functionality? Thanks, Matt R. Scott Perry wrote: You are correct -- I'll see if I can get a new interim

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-13 Thread Kami Razvan
] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending? You are correct -- I'll see if I can get a new interim release online which will take care of this. There is a new interim release 1.79i7 at http://www.declude.com/version/interim . It takes care of the issue of the ALLRECIPS filter not working properly

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-13 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Don't poke the bear, Kami. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: Kami Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending? There is a new interim release 1.79i7 at :) Scott... Now

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Don't poke the bear, Kami. But don't you know, Kami likes living on the edge. ;) John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-12 Thread Russ Uhte \(Lists\)
At 02:09 PM 5/12/2004, Matt wrote: Scott, I have a filter called FOREIGN that I have been defeating with END statements for certain domains with international traffic like so - Foreign.txt - ALLRECIPSENDCONTAINS@clientdomain.com Matt, Are you using an interim version of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a filter called FOREIGN that I have been defeating with END statements for certain domains with international traffic like so - Foreign.txt - ALLRECIPSENDCONTAINS@clientdomain.com I just noticed an E-mail that was held which failed this filter for this client. Note

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
Are you using an interim version of Declude? I just recently had this problem, and contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] They told me there was a bug with the ALLRECIPS in the current interim, and that it would be resolved in a future interim. For now, I've had to return back to the latest beta. If

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-12 Thread Russ Uhte \(Lists\)
At 02:31 PM 5/12/2004, R. Scott Perry wrote: Are you using an interim version of Declude? I just recently had this problem, and contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] They told me there was a bug with the ALLRECIPS in the current interim, and that it would be resolved in a future interim. For now, I've

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?

2004-05-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
Not to start a huge long thread about interims and such, but if you can get this interim released, do you know if that little problem with the zip files (zipped but didn't abide by the zipped rules) getting caught by banext ezip will be fixed as well... Yes (whenever we say that something has