This appears to be an IMail behavior and not caused by Declude. There
are double IMail headers in there, and they have different spool names too.
This may be due to domains being configured for different IP's in
IMail. This might require some registry hacking to straighten out. You
should
What I found so far is that the user is
using AUTH and I whitelist auth so if the whitelist run before my filter it
probably wont work right?
How could I get this to work?
Kyle
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Fisher
Sent: Thursday, June
.
- Original Message -
From: Kyle Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto
What I found so far is
that the user is using AUTH and I whitelist auth so if the whitelist run before
my filter it probably wont
02, 2005 2:02
PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Copyto
Good point. Looks like you would have to turn off AUTH
for the user, which may be undesirable for other reasons. I don't think
you can run filters if AUTH is enabled.
You might use an IMail rule
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Copyto
Ok thanks. I am
already using the copyall account for Imail for monitoring a different user, but
there might be a way just to use rules to make it
work.
Ill try
it.
Thanks
Kyle
From: [EMAIL
Thanks. The article got me working.
Kyle
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis
Alberto Arango
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 4:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Copyto
Check
Check this archived message. I believe It
has the answer you are looking for
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24505.html
it the solution has a small error than is
later fixed in the posts.
Instead of warn, the test should use
COPYTO
Hope it helps
Hi Scott:
COPYTO means Send a copy to (not make a copy of this E-mail and send
it to). It just adds an extra recipient.
Uuuu - now I get it. Makes sense.
Somehow I thought COPYTO also supported copying to a file - so I assumed
it was a true copy action.
Thanks for clearing this up.
Title: Message
Hi
Scott:
I
think the the issue of "mutually exclusive" actions may not be obvious to a user
(after reading the manual).
I did
some more experimenting using the COPYTO action.
My
logic was - if I use a "copy" to another user, this reallyshouldn't effect
how the "primary"
My logic was - if I use a copy to another user, this really shouldn't
effect how the primary recipient's mail is acted on. From my tests it
seems as if DELETE/HOLD/BOUNCE basically are killer actions that cannot
be combined with ANY other action (other than LOG/IGNORE)?
I have the need to
. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] COPYTO combined with
DELETE/HOLD/BOUNCE
My logic was - if I use a copy to another user, this really
shouldn't
effect how the primary recipient's mail is acted on. From my tests
it
seems
Using %SENDER%, it is giving inserting [Unknown Var]. If I use %MAILFROM%,
it is also inserting [Unknown Var}.
Sorry, it should be actually %MAILFROM% -- there is no %SENDER% variable.
Are you sure you are using %MAILFROM%? The only time you should see
[Unknown Var] is if Declude is expanding
Are you sure you are using %MAILFROM%? The only time you should see
[Unknown Var] is if Declude is expanding variables (as is the case
here),
and the variable is one that Declude doesn't recognize (such as
%SENDER%). But if Declude recognizes the variable (as has been the case
with
From the Global.cfg file:
BLANKSUBJECT1 filter D:\Imail\Declude\filters\BlankSubject.txt
x 0 0
BLANKSUBJECT2 filter D:\Imail\Declude\filters\BlankSubject.txt
x 0 0
From the .junkmail file:
BLANKSUBJECT1 SUBJECT ADDED BY SPAM REVIEW: PLEASE USE A
Is there any chance that you still have a file with %SENDER% in it
(which
would cause the [Unknown Var])?
HANDING HEAD IN SHAME
I updated the $default$.junkmail. I then have a batch file to update the
various other .junkmail files. I forgot to run the batch file.
John Tolmachoff
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 5:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COPYTO
Is it possible to use a variable in the copy to command?
Yes, it is.
Example:
TEST1 COPYTO %SENDER%
That would work
Is it possible to use a variable in the copy to command?
Yes, it is.
Example:
TEST1 COPYTO %SENDER%
That would work.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses
I use the COPYTO action for one of my tests, however if an email is sent
to multiple recipients I notice that its adding the COPYTO recipient once
for each recipient when this test fails.
Any way to make it only add the COPYTO recipient once, regardless of how
many original recipients there
WOW, you're fast! Thanks,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 10:59:47 -0500
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COPYTO
I use the COPYTO action for one of my tests, however if an email is sent
to multiple recipients I notice that its adding the COPYTO
Jan 2003 12:50:32 -0500
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COPYTO action on an Outgoing test
Is anybody using the COPYTO action for an Outgoing test (requires Declude
Pro)? I can't seem to get it to work. It always copies the email to a
blank recipient. I've got this line in the global.cfg
Here it is, and I actually sent a bunch of debug information on this
problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sunday morning...
Could you re-send that information? We don't have a record of it here, and
it could be very useful in solving the problem.
-Scott
---
[This
Sure thing. I just resent it, but this time to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry
Sent: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:41:42 -0500
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COPYTO action on an Outgoing test
Here it is, and I actually sent a bunch of debug information
if not.
Thanks,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Bill B.
Sent: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:48:00 EST
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COPYTO action on an Outgoing test
Sure thing. I just resent it, but this time to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry
Sent: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:41
Hey Scott, let me know if you have received that email now or not, because
I noticed the email was getting held by declude because the debug file
contained lots for words that set off our filters. But I added a whitlist
rule, so it should have gotten to you now. But let me know if not.
It
Hey Scott, let me know if you have received that email now or not, because
I noticed the email was getting held by declude because the debug file
contained lots for words that set off our filters. But I added a whitlist
rule, so it should have gotten to you now. But let me know if not.
25 matches
Mail list logo
