Would you say that this test is still a valid test? Is it
still worth
-5 when the e-mail does not fail it? If both SPAM and HAM are
almost never tripping it perhaps it is a moot point anyway as
all mail will have the -5 added to it.
-5 of what? The standard hold weight of 20 points?
In
Is there a description of what the NOLEGITCONTENT test looks for? It is
adding -5 to a lot of mails and I would like to understand it better.
It looks for information that is rarely ever seen in spam, that appears
more frequently in legitimate E-mail. The idea is to help ensure that
legitimate
This test should NOT be used to detect spam! It will be triggered Declude
JunkMail does not detect any legitimate content in an E-mail. Note that a
lot of legitimate E-mail will fail this test, but almost all spam will fail
it. Like the IPNOTINMX test, this test is good for helping reduce false
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NOLEGITCONTENT Test
Is there a description of what the NOLEGITCONTENT test looks for? It is
adding -5 to a lot of mails and I would like to understand it better.
It looks for information that is rarely ever seen in spam, that appears
more frequently
, April 08, 2004 5:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] NOLEGITCONTENT Test
Scott,
Would you say that this test is still a valid test? Is it still worth
-5 when the e-mail does not fail it? If both SPAM and HAM are almost
never tripping it perhaps it is a moot point anyway as all mail will
have
