Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-10 Thread Shayne Embry
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:42 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES) #2 was certainly the scenario. So what's the deal. Was or is Scott being bullied out of both of his businesses

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-09 Thread Craig Edmonds
I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%. So Scott Perry agreed to sell the code but kept a copy anyway and when the new owners of Declude went to raise capital they found out that Scott Perry had already developed an additional product with the code they had bought. I dont see the problem

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-09 Thread Heimir Eidskrem
From whats posted below I draw the same conclusion as you Craig. Craig Edmonds wrote: I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%. So Scott Perry agreed to sell the code but kept a copy anyway and when the new owners of Declude went to raise capital they found out that Scott Perry had

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-09 Thread Andy Schmidt
, Andy Schmidt From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Edmonds Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:42 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES) I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%. So Scott Perry agreed

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-09 Thread Darin Cox
to the purchase. However, the above two points still apply. Darin. - Original Message - From: Craig Edmonds To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES) I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-09 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Craig, Craig Edmonds wrote: I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%. So Scott Perry agreed to sell the code but kept a copy anyway and when the new owners of Declude went to raise capital they found out that Scott Perry had already developed an additional product with the code they

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-09 Thread Andy Schmidt
. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:03 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES) Did he keep a copy of the code, or did he just use libraries he developed through

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry

2008-09-09 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Perhaps suing your partners is a Rich Person(tm) idea of good Corporate Stewardship(tm). It certainly is a far cry from supporting, promoting, and improving the product line, you know, the normal way a company Earns Money(tm). Andrew. From: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-09 Thread Matt
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Darin Cox *Sent:* Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:03 PM *To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com *Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES) Did he keep a copy of the code, or did he just use libraries he developed through the years, as all

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-09 Thread Darin Cox
We all know the second example is the timeline... Darin. - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:59 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES) Well, Darin - it may be relevant to look

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)

2008-09-09 Thread Dave Doherty
And we all know that there will not be posts regarding the suit from any of the parties. -d - Original Message - From: Darin Cox To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:28 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES) We all