Travis not sure what you are asking with how to use a remove :)
1. To remove the external test just # comment out the test in your
global.cfg
2. To use spamassassin I would suggest using this plugin SPAMC32
http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release
/
David B
, September 20, 2005 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Travis not sure what you are asking with how to use a remove :)
1. To remove the external test just # comment out the test in your
global.cfg
2. To use spamassassin I would suggest using this plugin SPAMC32
http
@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Travis not sure what you are asking with how to use a remove :)
1. To remove the external test just # comment out the test in your
global.cfg
2. To use spamassassin I would suggest using
Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Travis not sure what you are asking with how to use a remove :)
1. To remove the external test just # comment out the test in your
global.cfg
2
]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Hi Travis -
Sandy's plugin does the 'somehow' part. Simply have it point to your
spamd.
Here is the line from my global.cfg that may help -
EXTERNAL.SPAMASSASSIN_v3.04
SPAMASSASSINexternalnonzero c:\imail\declude\spamc32.exe -cw
%WEIGHT% -sw 10 -f choose a weight 0
-f is supposed to be the filename... but the example doesn't give one. So,
how does spamc send a file name to spamd?
Travis
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
Travis Sullivan wrote:
SPAMASSASSINexternalnonzero c:\imail\declude\spamc32.exe
-cw %WEIGHT% -sw 10 -f choose a weight 0
-f is supposed to be the filename... but the example doesn't give
one. So, how does spamc send a file name to spamd?
Declude hands it off to it. Actually I
Thanks guys, I have it working now! BTW... any way to retrieve any info
from SA with regards to test failed or weight?
This is what I have in my logs:
Msg failed SPAMASSASSIN (Message failed SPAMASSASSIN: 1.). Action=WARN
All I have is a 1, that is the score I have set as the test weight, for
Sandy,
The latest Declude's support bitmasked result codes. You might
consider creating a user maintained map from tests failed in SA to
bitmapped result codes returned to Declude. I'm not sure what the
limit might be in Declude for the number of unique tests, but I have
managed to use 16 so
Travis Sullivan wrote:
So, the only thing I will see in the headers is the total score SA
results:
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMASSASSIN: Message failed SPAMASSASSIN: 3.
And declude scores only for the test group, like other tests in the
global.cfg file?
Correct. Very slick huh? And good job
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 5:44 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Travis Sullivan wrote:
So, the only thing I will see in the headers is the total score SA
results:
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMASSASSIN: Message
Anyway, the next version of SPAMC32 is coming out very soon with the
ability to consult a local SPAMC32 log file (rather than the main
SPAMD log file) to check which individual SA rules failed for each
message; this is a definite need.
Hi Sandy,
Well since you are working on the
Nick,
If you don't mind, is SA heavy on the CPU? What kinda load are
you running with SA?
I have 3k plus users getting 300k emails per day... my SA is running on a
linux server, P4 2ghz... no increase in load when I started using SA with
declude today.
The best config I have set is:
Hi Keith,
Keith Johnson wrote:
Nick,
If you don't mind, is SA heavy on the CPU? What kinda load are
you running with SA?
First I am no authority here but am willing to share my experience.
Sandy's spamd32 seems to be no issue as near as I can tell. The cpu
issue is with spamd. .I
for our three servers.
Thanks again,
Keith
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Travis Sullivan
Sent: Tue 9/20/2005 6:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude / spamassassin
Nick,
If you don't mind, is SA heavy
Sandy,
The utility in this is that the tests failed would be centralized in
one application, Delude, and available for combo tests and easier
diagnosis within that framework.
Of course SpamAssassin has a multitude of different tests and scores
within those tests, and it isn't practical to do
16 matches
Mail list logo
