We used a ramdisk with software called ramdisk plus.
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Chayer [mailto:scha...@intrasoft.net]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:42 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SSD vs HDD
Hello Everyone,
I think the question may have been
Dunno what you are using for a controller but if you couple these drives as
a controller cache with an adaptec 5805 for example the system will be
wicked fast almost regardless of the hdd drives used - as long as they are
enterprise class..
-Nick
MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support
On 3/4/2011 10:42 AM, Stephan Chayer wrote:
Should we use SSD drives or regular HDD. I have heard numerous reliability
problems with SSD and I am not sure if we should do it.
So far we have had good luck with SSD drives in applications like this.
Another solution we use on our *nix boxen is
Thanks Nick,
We are using an Intel hardware raid controller SRCS16 with 64 Mo cache.
Stephan
De : Nick Hayer [mailto:n...@madriveraccess.com]
Envoyé : 4 mars, 2011 11:57
À : Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Objet : re: [Declude.JunkMail] SSD vs HDD
Dunno what you are using for a controller
I'd second the RAM disk recommendation. You don't need to pay for
enterprise-class RAM disk anymore, as the feature is built into Starwind
Software's StarPort iSCSI initiator, which is free. We've used it for 2+ years
now.
-- Sandy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
