If F-prot notes a file as suspicious is it stopped by declude or passed.
Can this be a setting possibly? IE if F-prot notes it as suspicious allow
declude to block it.
You can add a line VIRUSCODE 8 to your \IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file to
block E-mails that F-Prot considers suspicious.
Just add the VIRUSCODE 8 to the config files. Note that it may have some
false positives, but we are OK with that. Would rather that than a possible
virus getting thru.
Sincerely,
Grant Griffith, Vice President
EI8HT LEGS Web Management Co., Inc.
http://www.getafreewebsite.com
877-483-3393
It was probably an admin that opened his own mail on that machine.
Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV USA
702.319.4349
www.xidix.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 6:55 AM
To:
Hello,
I was just wondering something.
Like most people on the list, I told Declude to block EZIP files. I just
got a call from a client that said that his messages couldn't be sent out
because it was an EZIP file (password protected zip file; payroll). I told
him of the server
Like most people on the list, I told Declude to block EZIP
files. I just
got a call from a client that said that his messages couldn't be sent out
because it was an EZIP file (password protected zip file; payroll). I told
him of the server configuration and suggested that maybe zipping
Declude can be configured to do several kinds of blocking for these.
Block all non-passworded zips.
Block zips inside of zips.
Until the virus writers use this trick it should be safe to leave this
door open.
With many different e-mail protection solutions (each handling these
situations
Scott,
What is the Partial Vulnerability that Declude Virus is picking up. I have
a customer asking me why and what and how to fix. [Partial Vulnerability]
virus in the Unknown File attachment.
Jeff Kratka
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 110
What is the Partial Vulnerability that Declude Virus is picking up. I have
a customer asking me why and what and how to fix. [Partial Vulnerability]
virus in the Unknown File attachment.
See http://www.declude.com/virus/vulnerability.htm for details. They are
using a *very* outdated option in
Jeff,
I ran into this the other day. Outlook/Outlook Express allows users to
split attachments over a certain size, and the default size is 60 KB.
People tend to turn this on when they run into a limitation and then
never turn it off.
You can turn off in Declude with BANPARTIAL OFF in your
Hi anyone else experienced problems with zipfile maked with the latest winzip version?
Reported by a user it is encryoting in a way per default so that declude take it as a
EZIP and block it.
Benny
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Hi anyone else experienced problems with zipfile maked with the latest
winzip version?
Reported by a user it is encryoting in a way per default so that declude
take it as a EZIP and block it.
If a .ZIP files is marked as being split among multiple .ZIP files (whether
or not it actually is),
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: 30. mars 2004 22:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] EZIP problem
Hi anyone else experienced problems with zipfile maked with
the latest
winzip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: 30. mars 2004 22:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] EZIP problem
Hi anyone else experienced problems with zipfile maked with
the latest
winzip
If a .ZIP files is marked as being split among multiple .ZIP
files (whether or not it actually is), BANEXT EZIP will block
it as well (since it could hide a virus).
No it's a single zip file
It doesn't matter if it is a single .ZIP file or not -- Declude Virus will
block it if it was
Hi,
We recently upgraded
iMail from v7.07 to v8.05
We noticed that
iMail also has an anti-spam feature.
We where planning a
licence upgrade from declude anti-virus to junkmail
also...
Who has experience
with this and why should I buy junkmail also if iMail has the feature build
in...
Johan,
We've
done the same thing and are also using the I-Mail spam filter. Declude
does have a junkmail option which I'd very much like to switch to. However
management seems satisfied with the spam filtering by I-Mail. As mail
administrator though, I am FAR from satisfied with I-Mail's
For those that are more informed, Declude is hands down a better
solution from multiple avenues, i.e. configuration options, false
negatives, false positives, and efficiency. IMail has at best first
generation spam blocking capabilities. The only advantage with IMail
anti-spam is that the
We tried IMail's anti-spam features for a few days
but had a lot of trouble with false positives and spam slipping
through...Declude JM was much easier for use to implement, has many more
capabilities, and is extensible.
declude.junkmail is the JM list.
Darin.
- Original Message -
Declude is WAY superior to the Imail anti-spam implementation, you have far
more control and granularity.
And if you do use the Imail implementation look over their filter files real
good before you use them, you will find virtually every airline, internet
fax services and many other non spam
As I continue to research opportunities for increasing efficiency in
order to extend the life of my current environment, I have identified
AVG Anti-Virus as one of the biggest processor hogs, and holder of the
most opportunity. F-Prot is 4 times faster, and maybe more efficient
than that when
FYI, I did some heavy talking with a contact at Kaspersky about 1 1/2 ago
regarding using their product to integrate into a product I was trying to
develop, but did not get off the ground.
They are very helpful and courteous.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
AVG takes about 4 seconds to fire up the AV Engine and scan. I'm running the
16bit version 6 of AVG.
I would recommend you to use McAfee. I use version 4.32 for more than a year
now and it is as fast as F-Prot.
Also it was the first and only AV scanner for several days who was able to
detect
the same happens here with f-prot for dos:
14:57:39.69 4 EXTFILTER(ANTIVIRUS) inp(39): * start virusscan for
Queue\1730292.msg
14:57:40.64 4 EXTFILTER(ANTIVIRUS) inp(97): * Found the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus !!! in Queue\1730292.msg MCAFEE.
14:57:41.36 4 EXTFILTER(ANTIVIRUS) inp(54): * Message
Adrian,
This is helpful, however the control is different as mine was based on
the 32 bit version of F-Prot (fpcmd.exe).
It appears from your logs that 16 bit F-Prot beat out 32-bit McAfee by
50% or more. I'm not sure if the F-Prot being 16 bit had all that much
effect, but one would expect
MyAV scanners are running a bit slower than
yoursbecause the server is not very new and fancy and we do not have that
much traffic:
PIII 666
256MB Ram
IDE Raid1 withold 2x30GB HD (2-3years
old)
I guess with Raid10, new HD, dual P4 and more ram
this would speed it up10x.
Anyway, the
25 matches
Mail list logo
