RE: X-SPAM-Phrase Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEZIPEXTS and BANZIPEXTS question and suggestion

2004-04-07 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
I am using version 1.79 Beta. I believe that the expanded feature you mentioned is not incorporated in this 1.79 beta version then. I will run my tests again to make sure and let you know. -Luis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.

RE: [Declude.Virus] BANEZIPEXTS and BANZIPEXTS question and suggestion

2004-04-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
I am using version 1.79 Beta. I believe that the expanded feature you mentioned is not incorporated in this 1.79 beta version then. I will run my tests again to make sure and let you know. That is not correct. We only have one source code tree. That means that when a new feature is added, any

[Declude.Virus] declude clamav utilities

2004-04-07 Thread Terry Fritts
I've written a couple of utilities for clamav that we thought we'd share. runclamd - an nt service that keeps the windows port of the clamd service running. command line options for install, start, stop, remove. Using clamd results in much better scanning time. runclamscan - a wrapper

RE: [Declude.Virus] BANEZIPEXTS and BANZIPEXTS question and suggestion

2004-04-07 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
I did some tests again, and the zips where caught. However the initial test file I used wasn't caught. I haven't been able to reproduce the file again in away it is not caught by declude. But I have the original file that I tested and retested and that Declude let it pass. I am sure that the

RE: [Declude.Virus] BANEZIPEXTS and BANZIPEXTS question and suggestion

2004-04-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
I did some tests again, and the zips where caught. However the initial test file I used wasn't caught. I haven't been able to reproduce the file again in away it is not caught by declude. But I have the original file that I tested and retested and that Declude let it pass. I am sure that the

[Declude.Virus] FYI

2004-04-07 Thread Kami Razvan
Thought it could be of interest. Kami http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci958574,00.html?track=NL-102ad=479694 F-Secure antivirus software vulnerable to Sober-D worm By Edmund X. DeJesus, Contributing

Re: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
What happens when the 30 days is up and declude deactivates? At that point, mail will be handled almost exactly the same as it was before Declude was installed (the core Declude code will still run, but E-mail will be delivered exactly as it had before).

[Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread Mitch Hegstad
What happens when the 30 days is up and declude deactivates?

RE: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread Mitch Hegstad
Are the virus's passed on to the users? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation What happens when the 30 days is up and declude

RE: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
What happens when the 30 days is up and declude deactivates? At that point, mail will be handled almost exactly the same as it was before Declude was installed (the core Declude code will still run, but E-mail will be delivered exactly as it had before). Are the virus's passed on to the users?

RE: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread Ncl Admin
One would think that prior to the 30 day trial one would purchase declude and it would run forever! At 12:20 PM 4/7/2004 -0400, you wrote: What happens when the 30 days is up and declude deactivates? At that point, mail will be handled almost exactly the same as it was before Declude was

RE: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread Mitch Hegstad
I can't argue with that. I just wish I wasn't left in a worse situation than I was prior to setting up declude when it deactivated. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ncl Admin Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread marc catuogno
I believe you are in the same exact situation you were before the trial. Imail would've passed on the spam and viruses too with out Declude. I would buy it, really, it is the only thing saving my butt... Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread Rodney Bertsch
1,000,000 praises to Declude and Scott!!! It's FANTASTIC!! The only reason we haven't migrated to a different mail program is because of Declude, not I-Mail. And Scott's service is FANTASTIC! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of marc catuogno

RE: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread ISPHuset Nordic
Hear Hear... Have had so many problems with Imail, declude has so far kept me from going to other systems Benny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodney Bertsch Sent: 7. april 2004 19:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

[Declude.Virus] F-Prot Updater

2004-04-07 Thread Lukasz Kaminski
I was wondering if someone could point out the advantages/disadvantages between using the F-Prot updater and the F-Prot for DOS updater from declude.com/tools. I only run 1 IMail Server. I spoke to F-Prot Support and they confirmed that their updater renews both the win32 and DOS definitions.

Re: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread Dan Geiser
I'm confused. Why is it a worse situation? - Original Message - From: Mitch Hegstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation I can't argue with that. I just wish I wasn't left in a worse situation than

Re: [Declude.Virus] Deactivation

2004-04-07 Thread Darin Cox
How is it that you're in a worse situation During the trial it works, after the trial you're back where you started. To completely remove it from mail processing after the trial just follow the instructions in the Declude JM manual. Darin. - Original Message - From: Mitch Hegstad

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Updater

2004-04-07 Thread andyb
I use the F-prot updater, no problem. Andy - Original Message - From: Lukasz Kaminski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:49 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Updater I was wondering if someone could point out the advantages/disadvantages

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Updater

2004-04-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
I was wondering if someone could point out the advantages/disadvantages between using the F-Prot updater and the F-Prot for DOS updater from declude.com/tools. I only run 1 IMail Server. I spoke to F-Prot Support and they confirmed that their updater renews both the win32 and DOS definitions. I

Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Updater

2004-04-07 Thread Jim Matuska
You can schedule the standard F-Prot Updater via the windows scheduler without issue too. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech II CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Updater

2004-04-07 Thread Lukasz Kaminski
Cool. Thank you all. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Updater F-Prot updater only runs when logged in, which is not a best