Re: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-05 Thread Terry Fritts
It took a reboot of both machines to fix the problem. On one I had 288 process running which fouls everything else up. Clam is SCANNER2 Any ideas? What did the runclamscan log report if anything? What kind of times are you seeing in it for the actual scanning? The only time I've

Re: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-05 Thread Terry Fritts
I also use Terry's runclamscan with no issues. That's good to hear. Runclamscan is just a wrapper to return the correct virus name to Declude. It would be better really if Declude would modify their code to accommodate ClamAV's reporting. Then there would not be a need for the

RE: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-05 Thread Douglas Cohn
Mcafee is a CPU HOG. Uses double the CPU of Fprot. I have a low powered machine and cannot even run Mcafee but fprot is no problem. Both is unreal. This is the mcafee command line scanner. The declude archive includes a Wget updater that works fine. I use a 4NT update script but the Wget is

Re: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-05 Thread Matt
McAfee isn't a CPU hog, it's just that F-Prot is miles ahead of any other command line scanner in terms of performance. The only thing that touches the performance of F-Prot is running ClamAV in daemon mode, but it's understandable that running a virus scanner as a service would be more

Re: [Declude.Virus] Update

2005-06-05 Thread David
Barry, I just checked 'My Account' - the host name should be mail.orcsweb.com, not mail.orcswe.com. And we are not running JunkMail Pro, we are running AntiVirus Pro if that matters. SmarterMail is correct though. ;)) Thanks, David Weber Windows 2000 MCP http://www.orcsweb.com/ Powerful Web

Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question

2005-06-05 Thread Kevin Rogers
I changed it to HEADERS and still I am receiving emails from these addresses (got 4 of them personally yesterday). My virus scanner is now updated every four hours, so F-Prot caught these viruses, but I still am receiving the virus notifications. Perhaps the scanning takes place (and the

Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question

2005-06-05 Thread Darin Cox
Do you have the Pro version of Declude Junkmail? You have to have pro to use filters and outbound scanning. The fromfile filter I mentioned will work in the standard version, though. Darin. - Original Message - From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent:

Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question

2005-06-05 Thread Kevin Rogers
Thanks for the quick response. Yes, I have the Pro versions for both AV and Junkmail. Darin Cox wrote: Do you have the Pro version of Declude Junkmail? You have to have pro to use filters and outbound scanning. The fromfile filter I mentioned will work in the standard version, though.

Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question

2005-06-05 Thread Darin Cox
I don't know if it still exists since it is not in the current manual, but there was an option in previous versions of AV called AVAFTERJM that allowed JunkMail to run first. Otherwise you are correct that AV would run first. Darin. - Original Message - From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL