[Declude.Virus] Scanner Parameters

2006-02-02 Thread george kulman
The recommended setups for NOD32 and Trend do not have a REPORT line. Does anyone know the values to use for these in order to get a virus name reported. Thanks, George

[Declude.Virus] Heads up: something new is around

2006-02-02 Thread Markus Gufler
Block exe in zips (at least temporaly)! --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found

RE: [Declude.Virus] Heads up: something new is around

2006-02-02 Thread Markus Gufler
...seem's beeing a new varaint of Bagle.Virustotal says Antivirus Version Update Result AntiVir 6.33.0.81 02.02.2006 TR/Bagle.Gen.B Avast 4.6.695.0 02.01.2006 no virus found AVG 718 02.01.2006 I-Worm/Bagle

RE: [Declude.Virus] Encoded viruses...worried

2006-02-02 Thread Markus Gufler
It's not the only thread remaining without comment from Declude even if there was replies to other threads in the meantime. Markus From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott FisherSent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 7:32 PMTo:

Re: [Declude.Virus] Scanner Parameters

2006-02-02 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Does anyone know the values to use for these in order to get a virus name reported. NOD32: /logrewrite /log+ /log=FILENAME --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.Virus] Scanner Parameters

2006-02-02 Thread george kulman
Sandy, Thanks as always. Do you happen to have the correct content for the REPORT entry? George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:28 PM To: george kulman Subject:

[Declude.Virus] AVAFTERJM

2006-02-02 Thread David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
When scanning for viruses after JunkMail through use of the above directive, the following rule applies: All email will continue to be scanned for viruses EXCEPT those emails having a final JunkMail action of: HOLD DELETE David Franco-Rocha Declude Technical / Engineering --- [This E-mail

Re: [Declude.Virus] [IMail Forum] Realistic virus threat?

2006-02-02 Thread Bill Landry
I reported this issue quite some time ago, when Scott was still running the show, and never got a satisfactory answer. You can scan the raw d*.smd file with f-prot and it will detect the virus, but run it through Declude Virus, and the virus goes though undetected. After pestering and

RE: [Declude.Virus] [IMail Forum] Realistic virus threat?

2006-02-02 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
My raw speculation: 1) It is missed because the virus.cfg is using the "PRESCANON" switch (the default, I believe) and the declude.exe application does not decode the MIME or other coding as flexibly as a mail client would, or makes an uninformed decision about what is an object worth

Re: [Declude.Virus] [IMail Forum] Realistic virus threat?

2006-02-02 Thread Bill Landry
Andrew, I already have PRESCAN set to off and use the /server switch with F-Prot, so those were not the issue that was causing this behavior for me. From my virus.cfg: # F-ProtSCANFILE1C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe -AI -ARCHIVE=5 -DUMB -NOBOOT -NOBREAK -NOMEM -PACKED -SAFEREMOVE -SERVER

RE: [Declude.Virus] [IMail Forum] Realistic virus threat?

2006-02-02 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
3) On a very busy server, Declude may be aborting the scan because it is taking too long. The default is 60 seconds. ANSWER: Use SCANNERTIMEOUT90 in the virus.cfg or some other time value of your choosing. Andrew 8) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [Declude.Virus] [IMail Forum] Realistic virus threat?

2006-02-02 Thread Bill Landry
Scan timeouts were not the issue either, since my secondary Declude Virus scanner (TrendMicro) would catch the virus fine, and the logs would show the scanning to be taking a mere second or two. Bill - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew To:

Re: [Declude.Virus] AVAFTERJM

2006-02-02 Thread Matt
Thanks for the clarificaiton. Matt David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] wrote: When scanning for viruses after JunkMail through use of the above directive, the following rule applies: All email will continue to be scanned for viruses EXCEPT those emails having a final JunkMail action of:

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Scanner Parameters

2006-02-02 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Thanks as always. Do you happen to have the correct content for the REPORT entry? Good question. I _think_ you want REPORT - With two spaces after the keyword REPORT. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Scanner Parameters

2006-02-02 Thread george kulman
Sandy, Thanks again. I've put it in place but it'll take a while to test. I don't see many viruses in e-mail since they're mainly caught by my IPS. When the Blackworm furor dies down I'll run a Eicar test with the IPS on bypass and let you know. George -Original Message- From:

[Declude.Virus] Stuck as GSC Files

2006-02-02 Thread David Dodell
All of my email virus notifications are all of a sudden stuck in the Imail queue as GSC files ... I'm using the latest declude with Imail 9.01 No changes to the server and till last night was working fine ... how do I unstick GSC files? - Internet Dental Forum www.internetdentalforum.org