[Declude.Virus] reque slips by Declude?

2006-05-18 Thread Gary Steiner
Back on May 9 my server was hit by the Feebs virus. I am using F-Prot, which did not detect it. But I am using BANEXT hta which caught it. Two days ago I upgraded to SmarterMail 3.1 and Declude 4.2.3. Among other things, I've been looking at the addition of AVG to Declude. I noticed that

Re: [Declude.Virus] reque slips by Declude?

2006-05-18 Thread Dean Lawrence
Gary, I do believe that messages that have been re-queued do not get scanned a second time. If they did, you would never be able to re-queue anything since it would be continually caught. Dean On 5/18/06, Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Back on May 9 my server was hit by the Feebs

Re: [Declude.Virus] reque slips by Declude?

2006-05-18 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
With older versions of Declude and Smartermail you used to have to do the X rename to skip Declude processing. If you left the X off it would be rescanned by Declude. However, now that Declude is intergrated into Smartermail v3 what is the correct requeing process? Darrell

RE: [Declude.Virus] reque slips by Declude?

2006-05-18 Thread David Barker
I Remove the x and place the files in the \proc directory. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 7:59 AM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus]

RE: [Declude.Virus] reque slips by Declude?

2006-05-18 Thread Gary Steiner
So you are saying that the X is no longer needed? You just drop stuff in the spool directory and Declude will ignore it? That in order for Declude to rescan something it now has to be put in the proc directory? Original Message From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: