Re: [Declude.Virus] Commtouch/Temp files going back to last year?

2010-03-19 Thread Dean Lawrence
I have a similar routine that I run, but I utilize a batch file that
uses the command line forfiles utility. It was part of the windows
resource kits and takes parameters like /d -7 which would affect files
with a modification date of 7 days ago.

 No I have a little cscript I wrote that iterates through subdirectories and
 takes parameters like /lastweek  /lastmonth etc.



-- 
__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] BANNotify message

2009-10-16 Thread Dean Lawrence
John,

I do believe that the SKIPIFEXT directive will only work with file
extensions, not complete file names.

Dean

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:19 PM, John T johnl...@eservicesforyou.com wrote:
 Way back when this was introduced, we had the ability to list files names as
 well as extensions that we did not want the bannotify message to go out on.

 Example, you could have SKIPIFEXT install.zip and if the banned ext file
 name was install.zip, the bannotify message would not go out.

 Has this changed?

 John T
 eServices For You

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus. The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



-- 
__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] Vulnerability Flag Codes = 862

2006-09-21 Thread Dean Lawrence

Hi Don,

Try on the resources page. I'm not sure about the vulnerability code
lookup, but there is a bad header code lookup.

http://shopping.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=100

Dean

On 9/21/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think there used to be a way to lookup the meaning of a
vulnerability code on the Declude web site, but I can't find it.

I need to figure out what 862 means.  Can anyone point me to the
lookup or tell me the translation?

Thanks.



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





--
__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] reque slips by Declude?

2006-05-18 Thread Dean Lawrence

Gary,

I do believe that messages that have been re-queued do not get scanned
a second time. If they did, you would never be able to re-queue
anything since it would be continually caught.

Dean

On 5/18/06, Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Back on May 9 my server was hit by the Feebs virus.  I am using F-Prot, which did not 
detect it.  But I am using BANEXT hta which caught it.

Two days ago I upgraded to SmarterMail 3.1 and Declude 4.2.3.  Among other 
things, I've been looking at the addition of AVG to Declude.  I noticed that 
F-Prot still doesn't detect that version of the Feebs virus, but AVG does.  So 
I thought I would test it.  I still have a copy of the virus I received on May 
9, so I requed it unchanged and unrenamed to let it got through the new Declude 
to see what would happen.  To my surprise it was delivered!  No new Declude 
headers were added to the message.  Though SmarterMail did modify it because it 
detected it as spam.  I checked the virus logs (LOGLEVEL set to HIGH) and there 
was no listing at all for this message.

Naturally I am now quite nervous.  Why did this happen?  Have any other Feebs 
viruses slipped through?  Unfortunately the eicar tests don't have an hta to 
use, so the only way I have to test this is with a live virus.  The Feebs virus 
isn't one of the more common ones, but all it takes is one to get through to 
spoil the day of one of my customers.

Gary Steiner



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




--
__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Dean Lawrence
I would think that you would want to do the opposite, running the virus scanner before junk mail. This way if a virus is caught, it can be handled (either deleted or moved to virus folder) and you save on the system having to run your spam tests. Also, you know that no viruses are being routed to mailboxes.


Dean
On 1/27/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your first and second message seem to be contradictory or I'm dense.#1 The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages
virus scanned thus saving resources.#2 It still gets virus scanned.So, with or without AVAFTERJM, it looks like each message is scanned by the virusscanner (which makes sense to me).If that is so, then how does it
cut down on machine resources?Friday, January 27, 2006, 9:43:19 AM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Dsic Keith,Dsic It still gets virus scanned.I have tons of viruses in my virus drop pointDsic for ROUTETO accounts.Dsic DarrellDsic---
Dsic Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail,Dsic mxGuard, and ORF.IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URIDsic integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
Dsic Keith Johnson writes: Darrell, What happens in this scenario.Virus file comes in, AVAFTERJM is turned on, thus Declude scans it for spam content, lets say it is
 spam, thus ROUTETO sends it to a specific mailbox for customer to review for certain amount of days.Does Declude Virus still run against it prior to ROUTETO?My fear is that the virus file will land in their
 spam box untouched and the user will fire the virus off by looking at file. Keith -Original Message- From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darrell (
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 10:02 AM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME
 How does AVAFTERJM cut down on work?I thought it only affected the order in which JM and AV ran, and that AV ran each time, regardless of this setting.
 The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages virus scanned thus saving resources.It has been a MAJOR help for me. Darrell---
 Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI
 integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe 
Declude.Virus.The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA 
www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.DsicDsic ---Dsic [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA 
www.declude.com]Dsic ---Dsic This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.ToDsic unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], andDsic type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be foundDsic at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049
---[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]---This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 


Re: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] AVG

2005-12-21 Thread Dean Lawrence
Thanks Sandy,

I've never heard of NOD32. I'll take a look.

Dean
On 12/20/05, Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thelicensingis the one bugger about Symantec. I hadn't gone with F-Prot for my real-time scanner because you cannot configure exclude
 directories(whatapain!).That is pretty cool though about the on-changescanningoptionwithSymantec.I'll have to weigh the optionsto see which direction I want to go in. I really appreciate
 your input (your too, Scott).IrecommendNOD32 for memory-resident scanning (and for command-linescanning too, for that matter). 15 server licenses can be had for $500witha1-yearsubscription,anditsspeedand accuracy are very
competitive.--SandySanford Whiteman, Chief TechnologistBroadleaf Systems, a division ofCypress Integrated Systems, Inc.e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]---[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]---This E-mail came from the 
Declude.Virus mailing list.Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be foundat 
http://www.mail-archive.com.-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 


[Declude.Virus] AVG

2005-12-20 Thread Dean Lawrence
I am looking for a new virus scanner for my Windows 2003 server and was wondering what all of thought about AVG. This is both a web server and my mail server (imail) and I would be looking at it to be both my full-time file scanner and act as a secondary Declude scanner (I already am running F-Prot). If you like it and would recommend it, which version do you use? Would it be the file server edition?


Thanks,

Dean-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 


Re: [Declude.Virus] AVG

2005-12-20 Thread Dean Lawrence
Thanks Scott,

So the Symantec product has worked well for you as your real-time scanner? Are you using the Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?

Dean
On 12/20/05, Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

When I used AVG it was consistantly in the back of the pack for virus detections. 
It lagged so badly at the beginning of the encrypted zip days, that I had to swap it out with Clam.
It had pretty good scanning times.

I use FProt, Clam AV as a service and Mcafee VirusScan.
From a cost perspective ClamAV is free, and if you can find someone to sell you the command line VirusScan, it should be under $30 a year.

I use a real-time Virus scanner of Symantec. I'd really recommend a different vendor as a real-time a/v to provide another level of security.


- Original Message - 
From: Dean Lawrence 

To: declude.virus@declude.com 

Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 7:29 AM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] AVG

I am looking for a new virus scanner for my Windows 2003 server and was wondering what all of thought about AVG. This is both a web server and my mail server (imail) and I would be looking at it to be both my full-time file scanner and act as a secondary Declude scanner (I already am running F-Prot). If you like it and would recommend it, which version do you use? Would it be the file server edition? 


Thanks,

Dean-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists -- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 


Re: [Declude.Virus] AVG

2005-12-20 Thread Dean Lawrence
Thanks Matt,

I'm in a similar situation where this server is not part of my internal network so the only people who would connect to it would be myself and a couple of clients via FTP. I do have a couple of web apps for recruiting clients where their candidates can upload resumes via a web form, so I want to make sure that these docs are scanned as they hit the server.


Interesting point though that you make about mixed scanners on servers and clients. It sounds like you like Symantec for you server scanner, but you like it even more as a client scanner. If you choose to use it for your client solutions, what would you recommend for your server in that particular scenario?


Thanks,

Dean
On 12/20/05, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Symantec Corporate for my real-time server scans. I like it because it is easy to manage, but my servers also don't have any users attached to them besides myself and some clients that FTP to their Web sites. I'm a proponent of mixing virus scanners on network servers and clients. Symantec Corporate is a killer desktop solution because of the manageability, and if you go that direction, I would put a different vendor on the servers just so you have the protection of two completely separate solutions.
Matt 
Dean Lawrence wrote: 

Thanks Scott,

So the Symantec product has worked well for you as your real-time scanner? Are you using the Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?

Dean
On 12/20/05, Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: 

When I used AVG it was consistantly in the back of the pack for virus detections. 
It lagged so badly at the beginning of the encrypted zip days, that I had to swap it out with Clam.
It had pretty good scanning times.

I use FProt, Clam AV as a service and Mcafee VirusScan.
From a cost perspective ClamAV is free, and if you can find someone to sell you the command line VirusScan, it should be under $30 a year.

I use a real-time Virus scanner of Symantec. I'd really recommend a different vendor as a real-time a/v to provide another level of security.


- Original Message - 
From: 
Dean Lawrence 
To: 
declude.virus@declude.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 7:29 AM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] AVG

I am looking for a new virus scanner for my Windows 2003 server and was wondering what all of thought about AVG. This is both a web server and my mail server (imail) and I would be looking at it to be both my full-time file scanner and act as a secondary Declude scanner (I already am running F-Prot). If you like it and would recommend it, which version do you use? Would it be the file server edition? 


Thanks,

Dean-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists -- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner 
Internet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 
-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 


Re: [Declude.Virus] AVG

2005-12-20 Thread Dean Lawrence
Matt,

The licensing is the one bugger about Symantec. I hadn't gone with F-Prot for my real-time scanner because you cannot configure exclude directories (what a pain!). That is pretty cool though about the on-change scanning option with Symantec. I'll have to weigh the options to see which direction I want to go in. I really appreciate your input (your too, Scott).


Dean
On 12/20/05, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dean,I have done two sites where resumes were uploaded, and the number of infected documents was unreal, especially considering that both dealt with recruiting tech people. It is definitely wise to virus scan.
I would use anything for the server that can be easily managed in terms of exclusions (directories and file extensions). I also like Symantec for it's ability to be configured to only scan on-change instead of on-access. The licensing isn't appropriate for a single machine though, you need at least 5 to make it practical. Symantec Corporate can also be installed as a stand-alone client.
If you are looking for just one server, I would strongly consider another option with better licensing. AVG is probably up to the task, and F-Prot might be. The needs for a Web server scanner are not big when it comes to timely detection, so focus on configuration options and price. 
MattDean Lawrence wrote: 

Thanks Matt,

I'm in a similar situation where this server is not part of my internal network so the only people who would connect to it would be myself and a couple of clients via FTP. I do have a couple of web apps for recruiting clients where their candidates can upload resumes via a web form, so I want to make sure that these docs are scanned as they hit the server. 


Interesting point though that you make about mixed scanners on servers and clients. It sounds like you like Symantec for you server scanner, but you like it even more as a client scanner. If you choose to use it for your client solutions, what would you recommend for your server in that particular scenario? 


Thanks,

Dean
On 12/20/05, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
I use Symantec Corporate for my real-time server scans. I like it because it is easy to manage, but my servers also don't have any users attached to them besides myself and some clients that FTP to their Web sites. I'm a proponent of mixing virus scanners on network servers and clients. Symantec Corporate is a killer desktop solution because of the manageability, and if you go that direction, I would put a different vendor on the servers just so you have the protection of two completely separate solutions. 
Matt 
Dean Lawrence wrote: 

Thanks Scott,

So the Symantec product has worked well for you as your real-time scanner? Are you using the Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?

Dean
On 12/20/05, Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote: 

When I used AVG it was consistantly in the back of the pack for virus detections. 
It lagged so badly at the beginning of the encrypted zip days, that I had to swap it out with Clam.
It had pretty good scanning times.

I use FProt, Clam AV as a service and Mcafee VirusScan.
From a cost perspective ClamAV is free, and if you can find someone to sell you the command line VirusScan, it should be under $30 a year.

I use a real-time Virus scanner of Symantec. I'd really recommend a different vendor as a real-time a/v to provide another level of security.


- Original Message - 
From: 
Dean Lawrence 
To: 
declude.virus@declude.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 7:29 AM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] AVG

I am looking for a new virus scanner for my Windows 2003 server and was wondering what all of thought about AVG. This is both a web server and my mail server (imail) and I would be looking at it to be both my full-time file scanner and act as a secondary Declude scanner (I already am running F-Prot). If you like it and would recommend it, which version do you use? Would it be the file server edition? 


Thanks,

Dean-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists -- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner 
Internet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 
-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
 http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 
-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude 3.0 Beta for IMail and Summer Sales Promotion

2005-08-29 Thread Dean Lawrence
Barry,

I'm a little confused. If we have a current service agreement, will we not be eligible for the upgrade?

Thanks,

Dean
On 8/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Declude 3.0 Beta for IMail - The beta software is now available through theregular log-in 
http://www.declude.com/myaccount.asp? And follow the link for'Beta Program'.Please be sure to read the notes with this beta before downloading andinstalling the software.Declude 3.0 Beta for SmarterMail will follow shortly.
Summer Sales Promotion - This will end at 12 midnight (CST) on August 31,2005. Any orders time stamped on our server before the deadline will beeligible for the appropriate upgrade or discount.If you have any questions please call us at (866) 332-5833 between 
8.00amand 5.00pm Eastern Time.Best regardsBarry---This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
-- __Dean Lawrence, CIO/PartnerInternet Data Technology888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists 


Re: [Declude.Virus] Advice on Antivirus for System Protection

2004-12-02 Thread Dean Lawrence
Thanks Matt.
__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Advice on Antivirus for System Protection

2004-12-01 Thread Dean Lawrence
Matt,

Looking at the costs on cnet, I don't see any mention of if you get
the media with this cost or if you are just buying the licenses. On
the Symantec site, they talk about getting the media with their
license packs, but you have to buy at least 10 licenses. I only want
to run this on my mail server with no clients, so do you know if one
of these other sites sell just a single license with the disk media?

Thanks,

Dean
__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Server Virus Scanners

2004-11-12 Thread Dean Lawrence
I am about to setup a new server and I was previously using Trend
Micro's Server Protect on my other servers. I was wondering what
others were using for their on-demand scanner. I'm already using
F-Prot for my command line scanner with Declude, but I also need to
have a server class scanner for uploaded files. This box is a web
server and my clients upload word and excel files to the system. I
want to be able to scan those immediately.

The reason I ask about a different scanner than Trend is that my
service agreement with them has expired and their marketing practices
is forcing me to buy a whole new product instead of using my existing
copy. So, I wanted to explore some other options before succumbing.

Thanks,

Dean

-- 
__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Server Virus Scanners

2004-11-12 Thread Dean Lawrence
Thanks Greg,

Do you know if you can buy that online? I was looking at McAfee's site
and it that product was not listed for their online purchase. Do you
have to go through a reseller or distributor?

Thanks,

Dean
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] EOF message in log file

2004-09-03 Thread Dean Lawrence
I'm seeing EOF in middle of MIME segment [] [--= Multipart Boundary
22429265.75] in my log file. Does anyone know what this is and should I be
concerned or just ignore it (being that it is a Friday before a long
weekend, I'm more than happy to ignore it 8-).

Thanks,

Dean

__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/ http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.Virus] EOF message in log file

2004-09-03 Thread Dean Lawrence
Thanks Scott.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 10:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] EOF message in log file



I'm seeing EOF in middle of MIME segment [] [--= Multipart Boundary
22429265.75] in my log file. Does anyone know what this is and should I be
concerned or just ignore it (being that it is a Friday before a long
weekend, I'm more than happy to ignore it 8-).

You can safely ignore it, unless it is an E-mail you sent.  It just means
that the E-mail has a malformed MIME segment, which can appear in spam
sometimes.  If it is a legitimate E-mail, though, it would be best to fix
the program sending the E-mail.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.