[Declude.Virus] W32/Netsky.c@MM - new

2004-02-25 Thread Patrick Childers
There's a new variant out. http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_101048.htm ~Patrick --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscrib

RE: Re[3]: [Declude.Virus] Missed virus reports

2004-05-03 Thread Patrick Childers
Hello David, > BANEZIPEXTS ON Sorry to jump in but just a couple of thoughts. Are you running the "Pro" version of Declude? I don't think BANEZIPEXTS works on the "Standard" version. Secondly, I believe, in special circumstances, some admins configure "Declude Junkmail" to run before "Declud

RE: [Declude.Virus] Exploit-ObjectData trojan

2004-05-20 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message http://us.mcafee.com/virusInfo/default.asp?id=description&virus_k=100715   HTH, ~Patrick

RE: [Declude.Virus] .EML file syntax

2005-06-01 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message You could add a comma and then another address on the TO: line. This is what I do for my BANnotify message.   FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO: %ALLRECIP%, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SUBJECT: blah blah blah   HTH, Patrick From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha

RE: [Declude.Virus] .EML file syntax

2005-06-01 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message I agree...   ~Patrick From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran JovanovicSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 3:11 PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] .EML file syntax Yes that is what I have resorted to

RE: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File

2005-06-03 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message We block .exe's and zips containing exe's. Check out  item #15 (Banning files based on extension) in the Declude Virus Manual at http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=117 . You must be running the "Standard" or "Pro" version of Declude Virus.   HTH, ~Patrick From: [E

RE: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File

2005-06-03 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message From the 4th paragraph of section 15 (of the link I posted):   "If you wish the banned file extensions to apply to files with .ZIP files, you can add a line "BANZIPEXTS ON" to your \{MAILSERVER}\Declude\virus.cfg file. For example, if you have a line "BANEXT EXE" and "BANZIPEX

RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick Childers
How much are we willing to pay? It doesn't matter if it costs $5 or $5000 if the product doesn't work. Especially when you, the developer, doesn't notice the problem for a month and a half - especially when the problem has been reported by end users. Do you not run your own product? Maybe you d

RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick Childers
about me as a customer, I will pay much more than I would to a >company that doesn't project those qualities. >Oh, and by the way, I know how to setup a firewall. So, why don't you guys concentrate on your code instead. >Thanks, >Patrick Thanks David Fro

RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick Childers
upp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Childers Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:50 PM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year? Comments are in-line. _ From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David Bar

RE: [Declude.Virus] Braid virus

2002-11-08 Thread Patrick Childers
I have caught only two, and that was late yesterday. I am using McAfee. It identified it as "W32/Braid@MM" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:Declude.Virus-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.Virus] E-card email

2002-11-11 Thread Patrick Childers
> I tried your "body" test and it did NOT catch that email! May be it will > catch the redistribution mails that are sent after a machine has > caught the > worm. > > Best Regards > Andy Schmidt I filtered on F r i e n d - g r e e t i n g s . c o m (without the spaces) because of the copy of this

RE: [Declude.Virus] E-card email

2002-11-11 Thread Patrick Childers
> Why bother if you are adding a weight of "0"? > > Bill I'm bouncing the message... -Patrick --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To

RE: [Declude.Virus] E-card email

2002-11-11 Thread Patrick Childers
John, Please excuse my ignorance, but what does the backslash variable do to the filter? -Patrick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:Declude.Virus-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

RE: [Declude.Virus] E-card email

2002-11-11 Thread Patrick Childers
> That is not a variable. > > Some of the messages had that as part of the address. > > Again, that is without the spaces. (Which are there in this posting so it > does not get caught by everyone's filters and rules.) Thank You John, -Patrick --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfe

[Declude.Virus] Stopping bounce messages for "MIME segment in MIME Preamble" vulnerability

2002-11-15 Thread Patrick Childers
Good Morning All, For the last couple of days, Declude has been catching many "Outlook 'MIME segment in MIME Preamble' Vulnerability" messages. They have all been SPAM. I don't want to send any bounce messages (for this vulnerability) to my users. Is this OK? SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Outlook 'MIME

RE: [Declude.Virus] Stopping bounce messages for "MIME segment in MIME Preamble" vulnerability

2002-11-15 Thread Patrick Childers
Thanks Scott! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:Declude.Virus-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Stopping bounce messages for "MIME segment > in MIME Preamble

RE: [Declude.Virus] So Big E detection

2003-06-27 Thread Patrick Childers
> I have two scanners running, McAfee and F-Prot. On the McAfee > side, I believe I'm running the 4.2.60 engine and the 4273 > DAT file, but I'm not at the shop where I can triple check. > F-Prot is catching these So-Big-E [name munged to protect the > guilty] viruses like a champion, but the