] On Behalf Of David
Dodell
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 9:43 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Which scanner?
In my email reports, is there a way to also signify which scanner caught the
virus; ie internal vs one of the external scanners?
so my reports now look like
In my email reports, is there a way to also signify which scanner caught the
virus; ie internal vs one of the external scanners?
so my reports now look like;
Declude Virus v4.6.35 caught the following:
Virus Name: Sanesecurity.Junk.26145.UNOFFICIAL
Virus File: Unknown File
From: lyris-nore.
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Which Scanner is "BEST"
DC..
The one most people use is F-Prot and a lot also use AVG
For less than $200 you can have both of them running using Declude Virus Pro
version.
Some people ar
arkus Gufler
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Which Scanner is "BEST"
> http://www.pcwelt.de/news/viren_bugs/37827/2.html
>
> The above German link shows who is fastest on updates...
> found this via ClamAV which is ra
My experience with McAfee.
It
then calculates the time between each virus being first spotted
somewhere in the world by the MessageLabs consulting group and the time
when each anti-virus service has a working fix available to the
public (not counting beta versions available only to testers).
Th
MAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Which Scanner is "BEST"
> http://www.pcwelt.de/news/viren_bugs/37827/2.html
>
> The above German link shows who is fastest on updates...
> found this via ClamAV which is rated 5th. AVG is first.
> F-Protect is ninth, bu
Duh. I see now. Interesting - in this one (below) Scanner 1 (F-Prot)
reported Lentin and Scanner 2 (McAfee) says Yaha. I see what you mean now
about no advantage of order of scanner. I was kinda wondering if scanner
1 found something, whether it invoked the second scanner or just went
ahea
Duh. I see now. Interesting - in this one (below) Scanner 1 (F-Prot)
reported Lentin and Scanner 2 (McAfee) says Yaha. I see what you mean
now about no advantage of order of scanner. I was kinda wondering if
scanner 1 found something, whether it invoked the second scanner or just
went ahead
When we are running two scanners, is there a way to know which one caught
a particular virus? And if knowing that one caught more than the other,
would there be an advantage of placing it first in the sequence?
If you use LOGLEVEL MID, you'll see in the logs which scanner detected the
virus.