Re: Soft Upgrade and Downgrade

Kathey Marsden wrote: There is some info here: http://db.apache.org/derby/papers/versionupgrade.html#Version+Upgrade+Mechanism I think we could safely add metadata to the list of items requiring upgrade thought. This provides useful on how it is supposed to work, but is there any guidelines

Re: Soft Upgrade and Downgrade

Rick Hillegas wrote: 3) It appears that we expect to be able to run down-rev clients against up-rev servers running against down-rev data. For the most advanced server rev, the clients can range over all previous versions and so can the data. If there are N previous versions, Soft Upgrade

Re: Soft Upgrade and Downgrade

Kathey Marsden wrote: There is some info here: http://db.apache.org/derby/papers/versionupgrade.html#Version+Upgrade+Mechanism I did not understand the purpose of item 7 in the list that describes the behavior when the engine version is different from the on-disk version. It says: 7.

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1094) Make DatabaseMetaData.getProcedureColumns() JDBC4 compliant

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1094?page=comments#action_12371199 ] Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-1094: --- AB I hope I'm not discouraging you from pursuing this work--that's certainly not my intent. Absolutely not! Your comments are

Regression Test Failure! - TinderBox_Derby 387448 - Sun DBTG

[Auto-generated mail] *TinderBox_Derby* 387448/2006-03-21 08:22:18 CET *derbyall* Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform --- *Jvm: 1.5* 1645644 0 114.74% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386 Details in

Regression Test Failure! - Derby 387274 - Sun DBTG

[Auto-generated mail] *Derby* 387274/2006-03-20 19:45:57 CET *derbyall* Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform --- *Jvm: 1.5* 4645641 0 105.18% CYGWIN_NT-5.1_i686-unknown NA NA NANA

Unique constraints and null

Hi folks, long time no see. :)I think I'm ready to start doing some work on Derby again (not full time, but more than zero time ;o). I was thinking of DERBY-653, which Rick H created and then closed himself during a discussion in October. I think it would be nice if Derby behaved correctly

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1094) Make DatabaseMetaData.getProcedureColumns() JDBC4 compliant

I'll try to ping Lance Anderson (JDBC spec lead) about the JDBC and ODBC version issue. There is not specific tie to a given ODBC version. As JDBC evolves, we might choose to evlove methods that originated from ODBC, which many have. Do not assume there will always be a 1 to 1

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1090) Implement Connection.isValid as defined by JDBC4

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1090?page=comments#action_12371210 ] Olav Sandstaa commented on DERBY-1090: -- Dan, thanks for the suggestion of only using isClosed in the embedded driver. I have also wondered if calling isClosed would be

Re: Soft Upgrade and Downgrade

Rick Hillegas wrote: 4) What is the customer problem solved by Soft Upgrade? Soft upgrade solves many problems for users , support and development. It: - Minimizes end user intervention in accordance with Derby's charter http://db.apache.org/derby/derby_charter.html. which calls

Re: Soft Upgrade and Downgrade

Oystein Grovlen - Sun Norway wrote: Kathey Marsden wrote: There is some info here: http://db.apache.org/derby/papers/versionupgrade.html#Version+Upgrade+Mechanism I did not understand the purpose of item 7 in the list that describes the behavior when the engine version is different

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1090) Implement Connection.isValid as defined by JDBC4

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1090?page=comments#action_12371245 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1090: -- The query case actually seems somewhat harder to me, and one needs to understand the code far more, than the

[jira] Assigned: (DERBY-876) DatabaseMetaData.getSchemas() is not JDBC 3.0 compliant

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-876?page=all ] Knut Anders Hatlen reassigned DERBY-876: Assign To: Knut Anders Hatlen DatabaseMetaData.getSchemas() is not JDBC 3.0 compliant ---

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-876) DatabaseMetaData.getSchemas() is not JDBC 3.0 compliant

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-876?page=comments#action_12371242 ] Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-876: -- JDBC 4.0 has a getSchema(String, String) which was implemented in DERBY-968. That method does return the two columns. If

[jira] Assigned: (DERBY-1133) Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the embedded and DerbyNetClients like other Derby test suites

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1133?page=all ] Rick Hillegas reassigned DERBY-1133: Assign To: Rick Hillegas Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the embedded and DerbyNetClients like other Derby test

Re: Unique constraints and null

Hi Øyvind, Welcome back! Delighted to see you have not escaped our gravitational pull! Personally, I don't have any strong feelings about this JIRA, but it is grounded in the real customer experience of Dan Meany. For the record, the relevant section of the SQL 2003 spec is Part 2, section

Re: Unique constraints and null

Oyvind Bakksjo wrote: Hi folks, long time no see. :) Hi Øyvind! Great to have you back I think I'm ready to start doing some work on Derby again (not full time, but more than zero time ;o). I was thinking of DERBY-653, which Rick H created and then closed himself during a discussion in

[jira] Closed: (DERBY-610) After commit, holdable result set cursor used in positioned update can't access row

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-610?page=all ] Dag H. Wanvik closed DERBY-610: --- Resolution: Invalid Closed this, not a bug. The SQL standard 2003, Part 2: Foundation (SQL/Foundation) p 827: 6) If CR is a holdable cursor and a fetch

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-668) SysInfo does not print the right information when Derby is not loaded through the classpath.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-668?page=comments#action_12371258 ] Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-668: --- It turns out that there are several tests which run the 'sysinfo' code in situations in which a Java security manager is in

[jira] Closed: (DERBY-231) FOR UPDATE required for updatable result set to work

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-231?page=all ] Dag H. Wanvik closed DERBY-231: --- Is part of trunk and is tested as part of regression tests. FOR UPDATE required for updatable result set to work

Upgrade test and security permissions

Hi, As part of my work on DERBY-514, I was trying to run the upgrade test using the test harness (using RunTest class). I wrote an upgrade test using UpgradeTester class (created in my patch attached to DERBY-1075). UpgradeTester class uses classloaders to switch between old and new release jars.

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-668) SysInfo does not print the right information when Derby is not loaded through the classpath.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-668?page=comments#action_12371270 ] Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-668: --- I believe the goal is to run the tests with as few permissions as possible. Granting additional permissions for these tests

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-668) SysInfo does not print the right information when Derby is not loaded through the classpath.

On 3/21/06, Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-668?page=comments#action_12371270 ]Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-668:---I believe the goal is to run the tests with as few permissions as

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-668) SysInfo does not print the right information when Derby is not loaded through the classpath.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-668?page=all ] Bryan Pendleton resolved DERBY-668: --- Fix Version: 10.2.0.0 Resolution: Fixed SysInfo does not print the right information when Derby is not loaded through the classpath.

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1133) Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the embedded and DerbyNetClients like other Derby test suites

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1133?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1133: - Attachment: bug1133.diff This submission makes the following changes: 1) Rototills the jdbc4 tests so that, in general, they get their connections using

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-993) junitTests cannot be run with J2ME

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-993?page=comments#action_12371280 ] Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-993: --- Patch 20_b looks good to me. I'll commit shortly. Thanks for working on this, Andreas and Myrna. junitTests cannot be run with

[jira] Closed: (DERBY-668) SysInfo does not print the right information when Derby is not loaded through the classpath.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-668?page=all ] Bryan Pendleton closed DERBY-668: - I added a brief release note to the CHANGES file mentioning the new behavior and the new security requirement. SysInfo does not print the right

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-993) junitTests cannot be run with J2ME

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-993?page=all ] Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-993: --- Fix Version: 10.2.0.0 Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 387605. junitTests cannot be run with J2ME --

[jira] Created: (DERBY-1134) Add a test to test that client connection state is set properly and matches server behaviour for different types of connections.

Add a test to test that client connection state is set properly and matches server behaviour for different types of connections. Key: DERBY-1134 URL:

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1044) [xa] client XAConnection.getConnection() does not have the correct default isolation level if set by an earlier connection obtained from the same XAConnection

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1044?page=comments#action_12371293 ] Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1044: --- I verified that this is a generic problem for connections obtained from PooledConnections so is not limitted to XA. Should I

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1133) Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the embedded and DerbyNetClients like other Derby test suites

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1133?page=comments#action_12371295 ] Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-1133: It is a bit unclear to me why we need to have two different suites. Is it done to make it easier to keep the overview?

Regression Test Failure! - TinderBox_Derby 387599 - Sun DBTG

[Auto-generated mail] *TinderBox_Derby* 387599/2006-03-21 19:42:27 CET *derbyall* Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform --- *Jvm: 1.5* 1645644 0 115.64% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386 Details in

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1090) Implement Connection.isValid as defined by JDBC4

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1090?page=comments#action_12371306 ] Olav Sandstaa commented on DERBY-1090: -- Thanks for commenting on this, Dan. I agree that using a query is more complicated than just checking for isClosed. So if

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1114) derbynet/testSecMec.java fails intermittently and test exits mysteriously when server is shutdown as part of the testrun.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1114?page=comments#action_12371307 ] Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-1114: The next two things I'm intending to try are: - Knut Anders's suggestion of wrapping System.out to detect a close(), and -

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1133) Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the embedded and DerbyNetClients like other Derby test suites

On 3/21/06, Kristian Waagan (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1133?page=comments#action_12371295 ]Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-1133:It is a bit unclear to me why we need to have two different suites.Is

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1090) Implement Connection.isValid as defined by JDBC4

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1090?page=all ] Olav Sandstaa updated DERBY-1090: - Attachment: embedded1090-query.diff The patch contains one alternative implementation of Connection.isValid() for the embedded driver by verifying that the

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1090) Implement Connection.isValid as defined by JDBC4

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1090?page=comments#action_12371312 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1090: Hi, Olav. It's not clear to me what a committer needs to do with this patch. You have checked the box saying you

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1133) Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the embedded and DerbyNetClients like other Derby test suites

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1133?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1133: - Attachment: bug1133_rev2.diff Hi Kristian, Thanks for reviewing this patch. Here are responses to your review: 1) No good reason. I just didn't know about

Re: svn commit: r387637 - /db/derby/code/trunk/java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/suites/derbynetclientmats.runall

Thanks, Andrew. I have been trying very hard to get this patch in, but the combination of being sick and numerous failed attempts at running derbynetclientmats to verify the fix worked have delayed me. I'll go CTRL-C my latest run of derbynetclientmats. David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1133) Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the embedded and DerbyNetClients like other Derby test suites

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1133?page=comments#action_12371317 ] Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1133: -- Committed the second patch at subversion revision 387640. Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the

Re: svn commit: r387640 - in /db/derby/code/trunk/java/testing: ./ org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/master/ org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/suites/ org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tes

Hi, Rick, this looks great, thanks for this work! A couple of questions: - Is there any reason these weren't written as JUnit tests? I suspect the answer is (a) they were originally written before the JUnit framework was in place and (b) it was too much work to migrate as part of this

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1075) Combine the script and the test available for upgrade testing into a java test

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1075?page=all ] Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1075: Attachment: derby-1075-v1.diff derby-1075-v1.status Attaching a patch 'derby-1075-v1.diff'. This patch is based on the draft patch with some

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1133) Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the embedded and DerbyNetClients like other Derby test suites

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1133?page=comments#action_12371331 ] Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1133: Hi Rick, just read the readme. If you want to keep the running of the jdbc40 tests to a single command, you could always set

[jira] Created: (DERBY-1135) Run upgrade test using a security manager

Run upgrade test using a security manager - Key: DERBY-1135 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1135 Project: Derby Type: Sub-task Components: Test Reporter: Deepa Remesh Assigned to: Deepa Remesh

Re: svn commit: r387640 - in /db/derby/code/trunk/java/testing: ./ org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/master/ org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/suites/ org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tes

Hi David, A couple responses follow. Cheers-Rick David W. Van Couvering wrote: Hi, Rick, this looks great, thanks for this work! A couple of questions: - Is there any reason these weren't written as JUnit tests? I suspect the answer is (a) they were originally written before the JUnit

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1133) Split jdbc4 tests so that the suite can be run independently under the embedded and DerbyNetClients like other Derby test suites

Cool. Thanks, Andrew! Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1133?page=comments#action_12371331 ] Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1133: Hi Rick, just read the readme. If you want to keep the running of the

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1075) Combine the script and the test available for upgrade testing into a java test

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1075?page=comments#action_12371334 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1075: I looked at this patch and it looks *very good*! Thanks, Deepa, for addressing a very important issue and writing

Re: svn commit: r387640 - in /db/derby/code/trunk/java/testing: ./ org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/master/ org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/suites/ org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tes

Hi, Rick. Thanks for your response. I'll take a look when I get a chance. It's queued up behind some other things right now. David Rick Hillegas wrote: Hi David, A couple responses follow. Cheers-Rick David W. Van Couvering wrote: Hi, Rick, this looks great, thanks for this work! A

[doc] Java(TM) not getting rendered properly for html

The (TM) portion of Java(TM) is mangled on these html pages: http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/getstart/cgsintro.html http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/adminguide/cadminappsthenetworkserverandjvms.html http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/adminguide/tadminapps811695.html

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1125) Getting security exception because classes in iapi.services.info have been added to derbyclient.jar

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1125?page=comments#action_12371345 ] Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1125: --- I am coming into this issue late so might really be misunderstanding things but I don't like this idea of importing engine

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1125) Getting security exception because classes in iapi.services.info have been added to derbyclient.jar

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1125?page=comments#action_12371349 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1125: Hi, Kathey, I was wondering when you were going to join in on the fun :) The thing is, that these classes have been

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1125) Getting security exception because classes in iapi.services.info have been added to derbyclient.jar

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1125?page=comments#action_12371352 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1125: Also, to answer your question, yes, my understanding is that the bug reveals itself when derbyclient.jar is in front

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1075) Combine the script and the test available for upgrade testing into a java test

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1075?page=comments#action_12371355 ] Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1075: - Thanks David for looking at the patch. The reason I have the call to setContextClassLoader is to ensure that any classes which are

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1125) Getting security exception because classes in iapi.services.info have been added to derbyclient.jar

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1125?page=comments#action_12371361 ] Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1125: --- Thanks David, that is my mistake. I did not realize that this was part of the sysinfo code imported into client in 10.1. Please

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1125) Getting security exception when derbyclient.jar is before derby.jar because classes in iapi.services.info have been added to derbyclient.jar

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1125?page=all ] Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1125: -- Summary: Getting security exception when derbyclient.jar is before derby.jar because classes in iapi.services.info have been added to derbyclient.jar

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1075) Combine the script and the test available for upgrade testing into a java test

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1075?page=all ] David Van Couvering updated DERBY-1075: --- Attachment: classloader.jar Hi, Deepa. This is a copy of engine/org/apache/derby/jdbc in my sandbox. DerbyLoader.jar is a classloader I wrote

Re: [doc] Java(TM) not getting rendered properly for html

On 3/21/06, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The (TM) portion of Java(TM) is mangled on these html pages: /snip list of pages I checked the Getting Started guide and the output is correct for the HTML book and for the PDF, just not for the individual html pages Here's the DITA tag

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1097) Add tests for Statement.isClosed()

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371364 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1097: Hi, Kristian. Sorry to bounce this back, but Rick's latest jdbc40 test suite checkin has thrown a spanner in the

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-974) ClientDriver can lose some connection properties

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-974?page=comments#action_12371365 ] Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-974: Thanks Michael for reporting and working on this issue. I took a look at PropetiesTest.java and it demonstrates the problem. For your

Re: [doc] Java(TM) not getting rendered properly for html

On 3/21/06, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The output HTML is correct. It looks like your browser isn't honoring the charset attribute in the header. The header specifies the charset to be UTF-8, and the trademark symbol is properly encoded as such. I checked Mozilla to see if it

Re: [doc] Java(TM) not getting rendered properly for html

Andrew McIntyre wrote: On 3/21/06, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The (TM) portion of Java(TM) is mangled on these html pages: /snip list of pages I checked the Getting Started guide and the output is correct for the HTML book and for the PDF, just not for the individual html pages

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1097) Add tests for Statement.isClosed()

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371366 ] Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1097: -- I think that my rototill doesn't affect Kristian's patch. He has written a JUnit test which uses conventional machinery to get a

Re: Hard vs. Soft Upgrade

Discussion moved to derby-dev Rick Hillegas wrote: Soft Upgrade is a feature which I think was introduced after I left Cloudscape. Please bear with me as I try to understand how Soft and Hard Upgrade interact. In the old days, when there was only Hard Upgrade, Upgrade satisfied the

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1097) Add tests for Statement.isClosed()

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371372 ] Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1097: -- I'm afraid I don't know how to wire this test into the jdbc40 suite. I tried wiring StatementTest.junit at the end of the jdbc40

AccessControlException when running functional tests

I get this exception when I try to run a functional test. $ cat views.out RunIJ -- java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.io.FilePermission C:\eclipse_workspace\derby\trunk\java\testing\views\views_app.properties read) java.security.AccessControlException: access denied

[jira] Created: (DERBY-1136) JDBC driver on rs.getFloat() gives LossOfPrecisionConversionException for float fields containing Float.MAX_VALUE

JDBC driver on rs.getFloat() gives LossOfPrecisionConversionException for float fields containing Float.MAX_VALUE - Key: DERBY-1136 URL:

Build failed for TESTING target

Hello, I updated my trunk today morning and the testing target fails for me with following error message. The build for 'demo' target goes fine. The required class in the following compile activity is not found in classes directory though. Has anyone seen this ?? please let me know

Re: Build failed for TESTING target

On 3/21/06, Mayuresh Nirhali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated my trunk today morning and the testing target fails for me with following error message. The build for 'demo' target goes fine. The required class in the following compile activity is not found in classes directory though.

Re: Build failed for TESTING target

Hi, I did an 'ant clobber' followed by an 'ant all'. It went through without errors. thanx Narayanan Andrew McIntyre wrote On 03/22/06 11:30,: On 3/21/06, Mayuresh Nirhali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated my trunk today morning and the testing target fails for me with following error

Re: Build failed for TESTING target

ant clobber - ant all works neat !! thanks ! Mayuresh Andrew McIntyre wrote: On 3/21/06, Mayuresh Nirhali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated my trunk today morning and the testing target fails for me with following error message. The build for 'demo' target goes fine. The required class

Re: [doc] Java(TM) not getting rendered properly for html

On 3/21/06, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What browser are you using that it works on? I had been using Safari, but now I'm wondering if I had changed the default encoding, because using a different version of Safari on a different machine, I also see the problem. It is fixed by