Kathey Marsden wrote (2006-06-01 11:59:18):
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
That's a good way to look at it, controlled environment including:
One thing to consider is that the uncontrolled environment and the fact
that it uses whatever classpath the user running the tests has has
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1295?page=all ]
Fernanda Pizzorno updated DERBY-1295:
-
Attachment: derby-1295.diff
derby-1295.stat
The attached file derby-1295.diff adds a check in EmbedResultSet.java so that
only
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 410898/2006-06-01 19:46:13 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
133706573 0 112.11% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
EOFException when reading from blob's binary stream
---
Key: DERBY-1368
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1368
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
Versions: 10.1.2.1
Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
reading
I suggest that the distributed services level should be optional. Only
the agent level and the instrumentation level should be there by
default. This will also comply with the current Derby architecture
with embedded vs. the network server.
Let me restate to make sure I understand what
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
On 5/31/06, Vemund Ostgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get the test harness to specify a flag to the jvm when
new jvms are started to execute tests/testsuites, but I have got it
wrong somehow. I want to supply either -d32 or -d64 option to the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1313?page=all ]
Bernt M. Johnsen resolved DERBY-1313:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 411167.
SUR: Use DRDA's extended diagnostic to send ROW_UPDATED and ROW_DELETED
warnings.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1262?page=comments#action_12414440 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1262:
---
All tests ran successfully. Committed 1262_6.diff to trunk with revision
411174. I have started derbyall on 10.1 with
ApacheCon US 2006 will be in Austin, Texas, October 9-13.
The deadline for submitting proposals is June 28.
Details are at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-community/200605.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
cheers,
-jean
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1368?page=comments#action_12414446 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1368:
--
I think this is fixed for most cases in the 10.2/trunk line. For any newly
inserted value it will be. In some
Hi
I am trying to implement set methods for blob and clob in embedded
driver (derby-1341).
I plan to use tmp file system as temporary storage in case user pushes
in data more than
MAX_BUF.
can some some one point me to right doc where I should be looking for
this information ?
I know that
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1148?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-1148:
---
Fix Version: 10.1.2.5
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Submitted to 10.1
Date: Fri Jun 2 09:15:08 2006
New
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1148?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden closed DERBY-1148:
-
Client XA getTransactionIsolation() does not return the correct isolation
level when rejoining a global transaction
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=comments#action_12414473 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1341:
--
So I assume you are implementing the model where
DatabaseMetaData.locatorsUpdateCopy() method returns true, see
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=comments#action_12414483 ]
Anurag Shekhar commented on DERBY-1341:
---
I was wrong about life time of lob. It is supposed to restricted only for the
transaction (jdbc 3.0 section 16.3.1)
Yes its
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=comments#action_12414484 ]
Anurag Shekhar commented on DERBY-1341:
---
Initially memory may be sufficient to hold the array user sets in. But user may
call setBytes multiple times resulting in a
Dan,
If the purpose of the google summer of code is to get students used to
developing in open source, then I hope the mentors will encourage plans
to be developed fined-tuned on the derby-dev list.
Ofcourse, any features pertaining to Derby developement would be
discussed with the derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1262?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-1262:
---
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
10.1.3.0
10.1.2.5
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to 10.1 with revision 411223.
Anurag Shekhar (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=comments#action_12414483 ]
Anurag Shekhar commented on DERBY-1341:
---
I was wrong about life time of lob. It is supposed to restricted only for the transaction
Provide client localization for severe server side exceptions
-
Key: DERBY-1369
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1369
Project: Derby
Type: Improvement
Components: Localization, Network
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1326?page=comments#action_12414497 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-1326:
Hi Deepa, thank you for the excellent analysis. It is very helpful.
The only part that troubles me is this:
The interrupt
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-593?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh reopened DERBY-593:
Port to 10.1
Add jdk14 suite to network server tests
---
Key: DERBY-593
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-593?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-593:
---
Attachment: derby-593-10.1.diff
derby-593-10.1.status
Attaching a patch 'derby-593-10.1.diff' which adds jdk14 suite to run with
DerbyNet and
Embedded and client driver differ in the holdability reported inside a global
transaction for statements that were created with HOLD_CURSORS_OVER_COMMIT
outside the transaction
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1369?page=comments#action_12414514 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1369:
---
I was torn whether this issue should have been an Improvement' that affects
10.1 or a Bug that Affect 10.2 . Since 10.2
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1359?page=all ]
Jeff Levitt updated DERBY-1359:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Developers guide: example showing shut down of Derby system should not
contain a database name
Hi -
I am new to the project and I would like to start working on patches for the documentation.
Please give me developer access to JIRA.
My username in JIRA is scotsmatrix.
Thanks!
Laura Stewart
Remove special handling for handle varying client column widths
-
Key: DERBY-1371
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1371
Project: Derby
Type: Improvement
Components: Test
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1371?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1371:
--
Summary: Remove test harness special handling for handle varying client
column widths (was: Remove special handling for handle varying client column
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=comments#action_12414518 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1341:
--
Lance Andersen adds:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=comments#action_12414483
]
Anurag Shekhar
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1369?page=comments#action_12414522 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1369:
Hm. When I signed up to localize client messages, I did not think that
messages coming from the server were in
Handle data overrun of DDMWriter buffer more efficiently
Key: DERBY-1372
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1372
Project: Derby
Type: Improvement
Components: Network Server, Performance
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1372?page=comments#action_12414527 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-1372:
DERBY-867 is quite closely related to this issue.
DERBY-959 and DERBY-864 also seem related, though more distantly.
Handle
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1372?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-1372:
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Did not see that DERBY-867 was already open for this issue
Thanks Bryan for pointing this out. I am not sure why I couldn't
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1372?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden closed DERBY-1372:
-
Handle data overrun of DDMWriter buffer more efficiently
Key: DERBY-1372
Encrypted databases cannot be booted using the jar subprotocol (and possibly
also using http/https/classpath)
-
Key: DERBY-1373
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1373?page=all ]
Mathias Herberts updated DERBY-1373:
Attachment: InputStreamRandomAccessFile.java
InputStreamFile.java-patch
Patch mentioned in the problem description.
Encrypted
Ole Solberg wrote:
We now have extended our tests for the 10.1.2.4 Snapshot:
[SNIP]
2. New tests:
**
[SNIP]
Long Running test:
Using the DOTS ATCJ2(auction simulation) we have had a database running
for 14 days:
no issues seen so far.
Here is an
On 6/2/06, John Embretsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same test was run against the trunk not so long ago, and was able
to run for at least 4 weeks without producing the same error (although
memory usage graphs seem rather similar at first glance). I am assuming
that this increased robustness
Saturday, June 3, 2006, 12:42:49 AM CET, Deepa Remesh wrote:
On 6/2/06, John Embretsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same test was run against the trunk not so long ago, and was able
to run for at least 4 weeks without producing the same error (although
memory usage graphs seem rather similar
Jira says ...
100 Issues fixed since 10.1.2.1
- 78 Bugs
- 8 Improvements
- 14 Tasks, Subtasks and Tests
Last day for bug fixes: *June 9*
See: http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenOneThreeRelease for details and
Jira report links. There is just one week left for 10.1.3 bug fixing.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1069?page=comments#action_12414539 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1069:
Fixed in 10.2, revision 41136. Need to do a similar fix in the 10.1 branch
Client should unwrap exceptions thrown
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1356?page=comments#action_12414540 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-1356:
--
This is a simple patch which adds handling of the two exceptional
cases indicated in the title of this issue. I have verified
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-836?page=comments#action_12414544 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-836:
-
The code changes are fine but there are other tests, like odbc_metadata and
upgrade, that use the same test code.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1295?page=all ]
Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-1295:
-
Derby Info: [Patch Available, Existing Application Impact, Release Note
Needed]
Changing this might possibly impact an existing application if it
relies on
I am doing some Spring cleaning of old todo items and found this
pre-contribution peformance improvement suggestion for Network Server. I am not sure if this is
relevant or true with Derby Client or if claims of performance improvement with JCC ever were true.
I'll just throw it out there to
46 matches
Mail list logo
