On 6/15/06, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
DERBY_INSTALL is what has been in place.
If I remember right, DERBY_HOME was to be introduced in 10.2 to conform
to the usage of other Apache projects. And I bet there's even a Jira
issue for that ... I'll post a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=comments#action_12416463 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1032:
For this change, I propose the following:
* create new scripts which replicate the functionality provided by the scripts
in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1064?page=all ]
Fernanda Pizzorno reassigned DERBY-1064:
Assign To: Fernanda Pizzorno
Delete cascade causes NULL values inserted into table when after delete
Trigger fires
On 6/15/06, David Van Couvering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran derbyall on my machine prior to checkin and it worked. But this
checkin was the first time derbyall included MessageBundleTest. It did
not pass before then. I must have not properly checked in the output
file, is all I can think
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 414643/2006-06-15 19:46:09 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
16713697 0 115.76% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1388?page=all ]
Tomohito Nakayama resolved DERBY-1388:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Integrate processing code of two writeScalarStream methods.
---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-501?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-501:
--
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 414795.
Client and embedded drivers differ on invoking a procedure that
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 414797/2006-06-16 12:22:27 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1676675 2 142.82% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
Hi Jean,
I wanted to confirm with you what we should do about copyright notices.
Copyright notices seem to appear in three places:
1) On the Derby website
2) In the published user guides which we bundle with releases
3) In the Derby source code, including the source code for the web site
Hi Jean,
While I'm on the topic: I asked these questions in the context of 10.2,
but it seems that issue (2) may apply to 10.1.3 as well. Do the
copyright notices for the 10.1.3 release need to conform to the pattern
in (2)?
Thanks,
-Rick
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi Jean,
I wanted to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1326?page=comments#action_12416494 ]
John H. Embretsen commented on DERBY-1326:
--
Deepa Remesh commented:
---
[snip]
From current behaviour, we do not shutdown network server
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=all ]
Ole Solberg updated DERBY-989:
--
Attachment: 989-411220-derbyall_derbyall_unit_unit_derby.log
Mike Matrigali wrote:
Re: are actual result files for sun's DBTG test runs kept around?
I am looking
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-920?page=all ]
Bryan Pendleton updated DERBY-920:
--
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
small delta's to replace cloudscape etc with derby in comments/code
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-920?page=all ]
Bryan Pendleton resolved DERBY-920:
---
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to subversion as revision 414832.
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=414832view=rev
Thanks
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-137?page=comments#action_12416518 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-137:
--
I have (or more precisely, a test program of mine has) gone through all the
DatabaseMetaData methods and compared them to
ResultSet.updateBinaryStream fails when the result type is
TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE
--
Key: DERBY-1421
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1421
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1421?page=all ]
V.Narayanan updated DERBY-1421:
---
Attachment: TestUpdateBinaryStream.java
The above program fails with the following message
Exception in thread main
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1421?page=all ]
Fernanda Pizzorno reassigned DERBY-1421:
Assign To: Fernanda Pizzorno
ResultSet.updateBinaryStream fails when the result type is
TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE
I was trying to verify that the changes in DERBY-920 hadn't
introduced any new compatibility problems (they shouldn't, because
we were changing an internal class, but I wanted to make sure).
So I was trying to follow some old tips about how to run tests with
an old client against a new server,
John H. Embretsen (JIRA) wrote:
I don't know if this is very helpful with regards to this Jira issue.
Thanks, John; this is definitely helpful.
I'm a little worried that DERBY-1326 and DERBY-51 are getting inter-twined,
though;
it seems like your comments are very applicable to DERBY-51.
I
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1392?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali resolved DERBY-1392:
---
Fix Version: 10.1.3.1
Resolution: Fixed
I merged/resolved conflicts from this change in the trunk to the 10.1 branch
and committed
as follows:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1413?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1413:
--
Assign To: (was: Mike Matrigali)
As described above I looked at creating a message for this, but my take is that
one exists. I am taking myself off
Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Is it really realistic, though, to allow a setting of 2 million,
which gives the optimizer permission to try to create a
in-memory hash table of 2 gigabytes? I mean, I'd need a 64-bit JVM...
Related, is it worth putting a line or two in this doc telling the
user that it
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 414832/2006-06-16 16:02:27 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1676675 2 144.76% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
Hi, Rick
I'd like to redo your list in terms of (1) internal for source code vs.
(2) externally viewable because the new changes just affect the first.
1) Internal for source code : due date 8/1/06 for releases
This is a new policy that takes effect for releases starting Aug 1. It
doesn't
Derby web site source needs headers that comply with new ASF policy
---
Key: DERBY-1422
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1422
Project: Derby
Type: Sub-task
Components: Web Site
Bryan Pendleton wrote:
I'm a little worried that DERBY-1326 and DERBY-51 are getting
inter-twined, though;
it seems like your comments are very applicable to DERBY-51.
Yes, the two issues are definitely related. However, let me point out
that DERBY-51 is about what happens to Derby embedded
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-930?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-930:
-
Derby Info: [Existing Application Impact, Release Note Needed]
This change may impact existing applications as evidenced by the need to
change a related
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-930?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden reopened DERBY-930:
--
Reopened because at least release note is needed for behavior change.
Add support for autoloading of Derby client drivers
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1399?page=comments#action_12416568 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1399:
---
Thanks Olav. I reopened DERBY-930 so a release note can be added descibing the
user impact and describe symptoms users might
As you may or may not have seen on the blogosphere, build 88 of Mustang
includes Java DB 10.2, Sun's supported distribution of Derby 10.2.
This is great news, both for our team and for developers. Developers
get the Best Database In the World (TM) out-of-the box, and Derby will
likely get a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1394?page=comments#action_12416577 ]
Stan Bradbury commented on DERBY-1394:
--
Thanks, Halley, for all the attention you are giving to improving Working With
Derby.
I like your suggestions and think we
The call for papers is open and the deadline for submissions is July 9:
http://www.asia.apachecon.com/
regards,
-jean
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-396?page=comments#action_12416580 ]
Wade Chandler commented on DERBY-396:
-
Hmmm. I think what Scott said was he is working on it and no where did I see
where he said it works. He mentions something working
Hm, thanks Andrew. That may very well be, but it was also the case that
the master file did not get correctly checked in. I was running in the
classes directory. I'll run with the jar files, and see what happens,
and correct my logic as needed.
Meanwhile, I'll remove MessageBundleTest from
I didn't follow how this solution is going to be backward-compatible.
I'm assuming we'll be keeping the old ones around, perhaps invoking the
new ones?
David
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=comments#action_12416463 ]
Andrew McIntyre
I have been seeing this test fail on JDK13 platforms, both SUN and IBM
JVMs since the test was committed. Tomohito, do you have access to JDK13
platform and have interest to fix this failure? If not, I can help.
Satheesh
[bandaram:satheesh] svn log OutBufferedStream.out
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-578?page=comments#action_12416588 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-578:
-
Hi Manish,
I'm confused about what I'm supposed to do with the latest attachment. It looks
like it might just be the changes to
Since only predicatePushdown failed, I generated a
context diff for this one file. I already have a bunch
of other uncommitted changes in my view, so I'm not
sure how I can generate one patch file without pulling
in a lot of other stuff.
The following sequence of steps should work.
1. Apply the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1394?page=comments#action_12416589 ]
Stan Bradbury commented on DERBY-1394:
--
Opps please my mistake int he previous comment under #4: s/10.3/10.2
Of course Working With Derby is slated for release with v
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-930?page=comments#action_12416591 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-930:
-
I think that derby-dev should continue to discuss the issue which Olav has
analyzed in DERBY-1399. I will continue this discussion
Yes, I understand, thanks.
David
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 6/16/06, David Van Couvering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, thanks Andrew. That may very well be, but it was also the case that
the master file did not get correctly checked in. I was running in the
classes directory. I'll run with
Rick Hillegas (JIRA) wrote:
I think that derby-dev should continue to discuss the issue which Olav has
analyzed in DERBY-1399. I will continue this discussion shortly.
If the behaviour change for DERBY-930 is intentional a special release
note is needed for this issue in the section
This topic was raised in an earlier email thread
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.db.derby.devel/20899) but
it does not appear that we agreed on a solution. I would like to re-open
this topic and hopefully we can converge on how we want to handle this
issue.
Olav has analyzed a
My vote:
- Document it for 10.2
- Log a bug
- Work on fixing it by booting on first connection rather than when the
driver is loaded.
-1 on removing the autoloading feature, unless people have evidence that
this is going to cause real problems for our users.
David
Rick Hillegas wrote:
set CLASSPATH example in testing/README.htm lists an absolute path for
jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar
Key: DERBY-1423
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1423
Project: Derby
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-396?page=comments#action_12416601 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-396:
-
Hi Wade,
Scott did not submit a patch for this issue and he has moved on to other
pursuits. This issue is currently unassigned.
On 6/16/06, David Van Couvering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't follow how this solution is going to be backward-compatible.
I'm assuming we'll be keeping the old ones around, perhaps invoking the
new ones?
I was planning on leaving the old ones where they are, it's mentioned
towards the end
Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was trying to verify that the changes in DERBY-920 hadn't
introduced any new compatibility problems (they shouldn't, because
we were changing an internal class, but I wanted to make sure).
So I was trying to follow some old tips about how to run
On 6/16/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jean,
While I'm on the topic: I asked these questions in the context of 10.2,
but it seems that issue (2) may apply to 10.1.3 as well. Do the
copyright notices for the 10.1.3 release need to conform to the pattern
in (2)?
Yes, and I've
Build derbyclient.jar from a dependency list generated by classlister
-
Key: DERBY-1424
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1424
Project: Derby
Type: Improvement
Components: Build
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1424?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1424:
---
Attachment: derbyclient_classlister.patch
Attaching a patch for this issue. I haven't had time to thoroughly test it yet
due to trouble with the testing
Knut Anders Hatlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was trying to verify that the changes in DERBY-920 hadn't
introduced any new compatibility problems (they shouldn't, because
we were changing an internal class, but I wanted to make sure).
So I was
Anyway, setting those two fields to false in DDMReader.initialize()
made the hang go away, and derbynetclientmats runs cleanly with that
change.
Wonderful! Thanks for the quick analysis, Knut Anders.
It sounds like I should open a JIRA issue for this and we should
package up your fix and get
Hello Satheesh.
I have access to JDK13 and have interest to fix it.
I start to survey.
Best regards.
Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
I have been seeing this test fail on JDK13 platforms, both SUN and IBM
JVMs since the test was committed. Tomohito, do you have access to JDK13
platform and have
Hello.
I found that JDK13 installed in my development environment can not work...
Error message from java virtual machine was as next.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ java -version
/usr/local/jdk1.3.1_18/bin/i386/native_threads/java: error while loading
shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot
56 matches
Mail list logo