[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-606?page=comments#action_12454250 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-606:
---
The 10.2.1.6 jars are checked into the repository and available at
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2123?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-2123:
--
Attachment: derby-2123-v1.diff
derby-2123-v1.stat
The attached patch makes inUserCode a local variable instead of a parameter for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2123?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-2123:
--
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Remove workaround for old JIT bug from StoredPage
-
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote (2006-11-28 11:25:22):
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2060?page=comments#action_12454083
]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2060:
--
Getting Started with Derby - Installing Derby
-
Key: DERBY-2125
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2125
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Documentation
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2125?page=all ]
Halley Pacheco de Oliveira updated DERBY-2125:
--
Attachment: cgsinstallingderby.diff
cgsinstallingderby.diff.html
cgsinstallingderby.html
The diff
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2025?page=all ]
Fernanda Pizzorno updated DERBY-2025:
-
Attachment: derby-2025v3.diff
derby-2025v3.stat
I have changed verifyData() in the attached patch(derby-2025v3.diff) so that it
uses
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2104?page=comments#action_12454296 ]
Fernanda Pizzorno commented on DERBY-2104:
--
I think this is the documented behaviour. See the clarifications for
getString() in:
Mike Matrigali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be fine to use an unchecked and/or an ASSERT based check for
readFieldLengthAndSetStreamPosition. The store module owns this
access and is not counting on limit checks to catch anything here.
So an unchecked setPosition would be OK here?
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2122?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-2122:
--
Attachment: derby-2122-v2.diff
derby-2122-v2.stat
New and simpler patch attached (v2). This patch keeps the compatibility arrays
At this point, the high value issues identified by Rajesh have been
ported to the 10.2 branch: DERBY-1732, DERBY-1304, DERBY-1589,
DERBY-1716, DERBY-2008, DERBY-2014, DERBY-1811, DERBY-1693.
Regards,
-Rick
Rajesh Kartha wrote:
Hello,
I am yet to find a simple way in JIRA to review the list
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2118?page=comments#action_12454332 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2118:
--
Just an FYI - with similar changes and the DERBY-1961 test program and Sun's
1.5 JRE on Linux I was
Mike Matrigali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be fine to use an unchecked and/or an ASSERT based check for
readFieldLengthAndSetStreamPosition. The store module owns this
access and is not counting on limit checks to catch anything here.
Another question:
All observed calls to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2118?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-2118:
-
Attachment: d2018_clearlimit_cleanup_diff.txt
patch d2018_clearlimit_cleanup_diff.txt
Patch which improves the clearLimit() method by
I would like to propose a release schedule for 10.2.2. The focus of this
release will be to expose compiled versions of Derby's JDBC4 drivers.
The release will also expose a handful of bug fixes which have
accumulated in the 10.2 branch. Due to this limited focus, I hope that
we can vet this
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2110?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren closed DERBY-2110.
-
message typos: error 42X52, XJ100.S, XBCXU/XBCXV...
---
Key: DERBY-2110
Issue Subscription
Filter: Derby: JIRA issues with patch available (15 issues)
Subscriber: derby-dev
Key Summary
DERBY-2122 Optimize ContainerLock.isCompatible()
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2122
DERBY-2025 convert lang/updatableResultSet.java to Junit
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2125?page=all ]
Kim Haase reassigned DERBY-2125:
Assignee: Kim Haase
Getting Started with Derby - Installing Derby
-
Key: DERBY-2125
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2125?page=all ]
Kim Haase updated DERBY-2125:
-
Attachment: DERBY-2125.diff
DERBY-2125.html
Thanks very much for catching this error. I would call it a bug rather than an
improvement! I've made a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Matrigali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be fine to use an unchecked and/or an ASSERT based check for
readFieldLengthAndSetStreamPosition. The store module owns this
access and is not counting on limit checks to catch anything here.
Another question:
All
Bernt M. Johnsen wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote (2006-11-28 11:25:22):
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2060?page=comments#action_12454083 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2060:
--
[Auto-generated mail]
*Daily* 480128/2006-11-28 18:00:09 MET
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
lin
0519519 099.64% derbyall
063236323 097.22%
Rick Hillegas wrote:
I would like to propose a release schedule for 10.2.2. The focus of this
release will be to expose compiled versions of Derby's JDBC4 drivers.
The release will also expose a handful of bug fixes which have
accumulated in the 10.2 branch. Due to this limited focus, I hope
I started looking at the patch Kim uploaded to DERBY-1972 on Nov 13. Is
anyone else looking at it? --I don't want to duplicate any efforts.
-jean
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
I would like to propose a release schedule for 10.2.2. The focus of this
release will be to expose compiled versions of Derby's JDBC4 drivers.
The release will also expose a handful of bug fixes which have
accumulated in the 10.2 branch. Due to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2118?page=comments#action_12454402 ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-2118:
---
Thank you for providing the patch. For what it is worth: I ran same test on
your patch and these are the numbers
On 11/29/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! I will re-wire the javadoc and dust-up the release notes. Other
than those bits, I think we're in pretty good shape.
Might be nice to take care of DERBY-1919 while you're in there:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1919
Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm worried by this approach of removing checking of the limit or the
position, it's much like saying we don't needs bounds checking on
arrays because I know my code is correct.
The current code provides some protection from a software bug,
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 11/29/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! I will re-wire the javadoc and dust-up the release notes. Other
than those bits, I think we're in pretty good shape.
Might be nice to take care of DERBY-1919 while you're in there:
Multiple periods at the end of the error message XBCXU, which may have some
unknown meaning in some other language
--
Key: DERBY-2126
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2126?page=all ]
Manjula Kutty updated DERBY-2126:
-
Description: Refer the screen shot attached
Multiple periods at the end of the error message XBCXU, which may have some
unknown meaning in some other
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2126?page=all ]
Manjula Kutty updated DERBY-2126:
-
Attachment: ex1.jpg
Multiple periods at the end of the error message XBCXU, which may have some
unknown meaning in some other language
Hard coded words in the messages which will not get translated in other
languages
-
Key: DERBY-2127
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2127
Project: Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2127?page=all ]
Manjula Kutty updated DERBY-2127:
-
Attachment: 1.JPG
Please look at the screen shtos attached
Hard coded words in the messages which will not get translated in other
languages
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2127?page=all ]
Manjula Kutty updated DERBY-2127:
-
Attachment: test06d.jpg
Hard coded words in the messages which will not get translated in other
languages
The wrod class appears twice for the message SIF01.V
Key: DERBY-2128
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2128
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Localization
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2128?page=all ]
Manjula Kutty updated DERBY-2128:
-
Attachment: 2.JPG
Please find the attached screenshot for reference
The wrod class appears twice for the message SIF01.V
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1919?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas reassigned DERBY-1919:
Assignee: Rick Hillegas
Top level index.html page should link to release notes and other items in
top-level of a release.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1919?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1919:
-
Attachment: derby-1919-v01.diff
Attaching changes which point index.html at the release notes, license, and
notice files.
Top level index.html page should
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2126?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren closed DERBY-2126.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
I fixed this as part of DERBY-2110. My solution was to remove the periods at
the end of the messages XBCXU and XBCXV, and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1972?page=all ]
Kim Haase updated DERBY-1972:
-
Attachment: DERBY-1972-2.diff
DERBY-1972-2.zip
DERBY-1972-2.diff is a replacement patch that includes the following additional
fixes: 1)
Tasks related to releasing 10.2.2
-
Key: DERBY-2129
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2129
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Rick Hillegas
Fix For: 10.2.2.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2129?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas reassigned DERBY-2129:
Assignee: Rick Hillegas
Tasks related to releasing 10.2.2
-
Key: DERBY-2129
URL:
From a posting on the user list:
I actually just found a whitepaper
Oracle Berkeley DB Java Edition vs Apache Derby: A Performance Comparison
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/pdf/je-derby-performance.pdf
Just copying there conclusion here:
The Berkeley DB Java Edition
Just some observations from reading the paper:
o only one comparison is done with real durability? We usually just up
# of users or operations per transaction to show increased throughput
while not being I/O bound.
o great marketing on that first durability graph, I looked at it and
Optimizer performance slowdown from 10.1 to 10.2
Key: DERBY-2130
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2130
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Performance, SQL
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2130?page=all ]
Bryan Pendleton updated DERBY-2130:
---
Attachment: repro.sql
reproduction script is 'repro.sql'.
Optimizer performance slowdown from 10.1 to 10.2
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2130?page=comments#action_12454479 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-2130:
One experiment I tried was to remove all the secondary
indexes. I thought that that might shrink the overall
External DTD files are accessed without a privileged block when Derby parses
XML values that reference such DTDs.
-
Key: DERBY-2131
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2131?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-2131:
---
Attachment: d2131_v1.patch
Attaching a patch, d2131_v1.patch, that wraps the call to JAXP inside a
priveleged block. I ran tests with some local (soon-to-be-posted) changes
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2129?page=comments#action_12454482 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-2129:
-
Documentation: 10.2.1.6 documentation includes warnings that it includes JDBC
4.0 functionality based on a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2127?page=comments#action_12454483 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2127:
--
Can you expand on the issue please, I'm not sure what problem you are seeing?
Hard coded words in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2131?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-2131:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
External DTD files are accessed without a privileged block when Derby parses
XML values that reference such DTDs.
On 11/27/06, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/27/06, Myrna van Lunteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to make a comment re changing the number of parameters in a
message. I think, if a change is needed put into the english file,
the message should be removed from the
Bryan Pendleton (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2130?page=all ]
Bryan Pendleton updated DERBY-2130:
---
Attachment: repro.sql
reproduction script is 'repro.sql'.
Optimizer performance slowdown from 10.1 to 10.2
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2127?page=comments#action_12454494 ]
Manjula Kutty commented on DERBY-2127:
--
While doing some localization testing I came to notice those above said words
are not getting translated at all. They
Bryan Pendleton (JIRA) wrote:
Optimizer performance slowdown from 10.1 to 10.2
Just some quick comments based on my first (rather quick) reading of the
description:
- the optimizer changes in 10.2 seem to have given the optimizer many
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
On 11/27/06, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/27/06, Myrna van Lunteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to make a comment re changing the number of parameters in a
message. I think, if a change is needed put into the english file,
the message should
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2127?page=comments#action_12454497 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2127:
--
For 2805C and 2850A I would say that is correct, SQL keywords should not be
translated.
Hard coded
Rick Hillegas wrote:
When we introduce system-wide and database-specific privileges we will
need at least one more knob. This additional knob will control whether
these privileges are checked or whether legacy applications continue to
behave as they did in 10.2. Let us suppose this is another
Hi, Mike. I can't seem to find your followup email to this, but anyway, I
posted a blog about this at
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/davidvc/archive/2006/11/oracle_benchmar_1.html
Please feel free to comment either here or on the blog comment page if you
think I'm missing something.
David
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2127?page=comments#action_12454501 ]
Manjula Kutty commented on DERBY-2127:
--
For Example I found the TABLE/VIEW ' is hardcoded in
org.apache.derby.iapi.sql.dictionary.TableDescriptor;
Hard
David Van Couvering wrote:
Thanks, Mike, for your great comments on the white paper. I took those
comments and added my own in a blog response:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/davidvc/archive/2006/11/oracle_benchmar_1.html
Errmmm, David says in his blog:
If your product is open source, you
David Van Couvering wrote:
Thanks, Mike, for your great comments on the white paper. I took those
comments and added my own in a blog response:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/davidvc/archive/2006/11/oracle_benchmar_1.html
Very nice blog entry.
Dan.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2127?page=comments#action_12454507 ]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-2127:
---
Of course, table, view and function are SQL Keywords.
But, they're also just words.
In this case, the error
David Van Couvering wrote:
Thanks, Mike, for your great comments on the white paper. I took those
comments and added my own in a blog response:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/davidvc/archive/2006/11/oracle_benchmar_1.html
Another issue with the paper:
David Van Couvering wrote:
Thanks, Mike, for your great comments on the white paper. I took those
comments and added my own in a blog response:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/davidvc/archive/2006/11/oracle_benchmar_1.html
Charles Lamb is the author of this paper and has a blog entry on it
Gads, my mailer seems to have gone crazy! Many apologies for all the
duplicates!
David
David Van Couvering wrote:
Thanks, Mike, for your great comments on the white paper. I took those
comments and added my own in a blog response:
I read the paper and it seemed like an apples to oranges comparison. It
sounded like comparison of
some proprietary API to JDBC ?
Also could not find details about how exactly the timings were measured
(JDBC PreparedStatement v/s some put(key,data) API ?).
Anyways, here is another paper
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2123?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen closed DERBY-2123.
-
Fix Version/s: 10.3.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Committed revision 480861.
Remove workaround for old
70 matches
Mail list logo
