Re: Requesting that you be added in to the derby-developers group in Jira

On 12/10/06, Suraj Batuwana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to add me to the derby-developers group in Jira to edit my JIRA issue (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2144) Hi Suraj, I've added you to the derby-developers JIRA group. You should now be able to edit your issue in JIRA.

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-2144) Meta-data for Container could not be accessed when execute a SQL (select statement) for a View with 322 sub tables and views

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2144?page=all ] Suraj Batuwana updated DERBY-2144: -- Urgency: Blocker (was: Urgent) Assignee: Suresh Thalamati Priority: Blocker (was: Critical) Meta-data for Container could not be accessed when

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-338) Move checks for referential constraints from DDL execution time to DML execution time

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-338?page=all ] Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-338: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 10.2.3.0) Unassigning a fix version to this issue since it has seen no activity. Move checks for referential constraints from DDL

Re: query length

On 11/12/2006, at 3:54 AM, Rajesh Kartha wrote: Marcin Skladaniec wrote: Hi ! I asked a question about the maximum query length on the user mailing list, but no one answered. Does someone from the dev list know the answer to my question ? Regards Marcin Begin forwarded message: From:

Re: Releasing latches when waiting for locks. When and why?

Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: To see the effect of this change, I tested the patch on a dual-CPU machine with the test client from DERBY-1961 running single-record select operations. Derby was running in embedded mode, and the entire database was in the page cache. The results for 1 to 100

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1471) Implement layer B streaming for new methods defined in JDBC4.0

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1471?page=comments#action_12457335 ] Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1471: -- Through improving what Knut suggested, I found there exists a mistake in the patch ... Clob created from

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-1856) Multiple communication failures when starting server with derby.drda.timeSlice

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1856?page=all ] Bernt M. Johnsen resolved DERBY-1856. - Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 485667 on 10.1 Multiple communication failures when starting server with derby.drda.timeSlice

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-2129) Tasks related to releasing 10.2.2

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2129?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-2129: - Attachment: derby-2129-releaseNotes-v05.diff Committed derby-2129-releaseNotes-v05.diff at subversion revision 485671. This adds a late-breaking bugfix

[jira] Subscription: Derby: JIRA issues with patch available

Issue Subscription Filter: Derby: JIRA issues with patch available (12 issues) Subscriber: derby-dev Key Summary DERBY-1471 Implement layer B streaming for new methods defined in JDBC4.0 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1471 DERBY-2060 SET CURRENT ISOLATION in

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-1758) Enable xmlSuite to run as part of derbyall in environments that have the required external jars.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1758?page=all ] A B resolved DERBY-1758. Resolution: Fixed Final patch checked in on 12/04. One failure resulted from the changes but that was filed/fixed as DERBY-2153. So resolving/closing this issue. Enable

[jira] Closed: (DERBY-1758) Enable xmlSuite to run as part of derbyall in environments that have the required external jars.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1758?page=all ] A B closed DERBY-1758. -- Enable xmlSuite to run as part of derbyall in environments that have the required external jars.

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-2153) suites.All falls over with foundation after revision 482433; java.lang.NoClassFoundError: javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2153?page=all ] A B resolved DERBY-2153. Fix Version/s: 10.3.0.0 Resolution: Fixed Patch committed on 12/07 and no further comments/issues have come up, so resolving/closing this Jira entry. suites.All

[jira] Closed: (DERBY-2153) suites.All falls over with foundation after revision 482433; java.lang.NoClassFoundError: javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2153?page=all ] A B closed DERBY-2153. -- suites.All falls over with foundation after revision 482433; java.lang.NoClassFoundError: javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory

Re: query length

Marcin Skladaniec wrote: On 11/12/2006, at 3:54 AM, Rajesh Kartha wrote: Marcin Skladaniec wrote: Hi ! I asked a question about the maximum query length on the user mailing list, but no one answered. Does someone from the dev list know the answer to my question ? Regards Marcin Begin

Re: Some questions about FormatableBitSet

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are a couple of things in the implementation of this class that I just don't understand: - A minor nit: This class appears to do a lot of division and remainder calculations with powers of 2 (frequently 8). Is it not generally preferably to do this with

Regression Test Report - Daily 485215 - Sun DBTG

[Auto-generated mail] *Daily* 485215/2006-12-10 18:00:09 MET Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite --- *Jvm: 1.6* lin 0517517 0 100.33% derbyall 064786478 0 157.20% suitesAll sol NA

[jira] Closed: (DERBY-2131) External DTD files are accessed without a privileged block when Derby parses XML values that reference such DTDs.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2131?page=all ] A B closed DERBY-2131. -- No further issues/comments after the changes were committed, so marking this as closed. External DTD files are accessed without a privileged block when Derby parses XML values

[jira] Assigned: (DERBY-1798) Document Update: Tools Guide - Added derbyrun.jar information and clarified / corrected info on IJ and database loading classes

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1798?page=all ] Stan Bradbury reassigned DERBY-1798: Assignee: Stan Bradbury Document Update: Tools Guide - Added derbyrun.jar information and clarified / corrected info on IJ and database loading

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-1634) Documented syntax for storing jar files in a db has syntax errors

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1634?page=all ] Stan Bradbury resolved DERBY-1634. -- Fix Version/s: 10.2.1.6 (was: 10.2.2.0) Resolution: Fixed This specific issue was resolved as part of DERBY-1798, a general

Drop a Table Column using ij

Running the Derby software that comes packaged with Sun Java Studio Creator 2.1 Trying to drop a column (which i added) from the Travel database table person I get an error that drop is bad (not recognized) My syntax: running windows XP SP2 aij prompt from Command line alter table person drop

Re: Should be a statement with error allowed to do a rollback of the active transaction

So what you mean to say that rolling back of transaction should be dependent on the application's behavior. If my understanding is correct, then in DERBY-2017, the way I tried to handle the case in not correct. How this case should be handled then? Saurabh Daniel John Debrunner wrote: Julius

Re: Should be a statement with error allowed to do a rollback of the active transaction

Saurabh Vyas wrote: So what you mean to say that rolling back of transaction should be dependent on the application's behavior. If my understanding is correct, then in DERBY-2017, the way I tried to handle the case in not correct. How this case should be handled then? From looking at the

Re: Issue with Derby Views

Hi - Sure seems like a bug should be filed on this in JIRA, there is a test case and everything needed. Would you or Suraj be willing to file a JIRA bug? It is easy to do, information on doing so is at: http://db.apache.org/derby/DerbyBugGuidelines.html This way the problem will come to the

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-2060) SET CURRENT ISOLATION in ref.man refers java.sql.Connection.setTransactionLevel instead of java.sql.Connection.setTransactionIsolation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2060?page=all ] Kim Haase updated DERBY-2060: - Attachment: DERBY-2060-3.diff DERBY-2060-3.zip Thanks for catching this, Bernt. I have attached revised diff and zip files with one additional

Re: Issue with Derby Views

Hi Stanley, On 12/11/06, Stanley Bradbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure seems like a bug should be filed on this in JIRA, there is a test case and everything needed. Would you or Suraj be willing to file a JIRA bug? It is easy to do, information on doing so is at:

Re: Drop a Table Column using ij

Alter table drop column functionality is not yet into an official Derby release. Lot of work for the support of drop column has gone into the current Derby codeline and will probably be available in next major Derby release. Mamta On 12/11/06, DerbyDo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running the

Re: Drop a Table Column using ij

DerbyDo wrote: Running the Derby software that comes packaged with Sun Java Studio Creator 2.1 Trying to drop a column (which i added) from the Travel database table person I get an error that drop is bad (not recognized) My syntax: running windows XP SP2 aij prompt from Command line alter

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-2144) Meta-data for Container could not be accessed when execute a SQL (select statement) for a View with 322 sub tables and views

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2144?page=all ] Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-2144: Assignee: (was: Suresh Thalamati) Suraj, This is a open-source project, Developers work voluntarily. I can not assign issues to any one except to

[VOTE] 10.2.2.0 release

Please download and test-drive the 10.2.2.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at: http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.2.2.0/ The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time next Monday, December 18. 10.2.2.0 is a bugfix vehicle,

Re: plugging more security holes in Derby

I have attached a first draft of a functional spec to the JIRA for this topic: DERBY-2109. This first draft attempts to summarize the discussion so far. Would appreciate continued feedback from the community. Thanks, -Rick

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-2109) System privileges

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-2109: - Attachment: systemPrivs.html Attaching first rev of a functional spec for this feature. This spec incorporates feedback from the discussion on derby-dev: o

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1842) Accessibility of figures in Derby Docs

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1842?page=comments#action_12457472 ] Kim Haase commented on DERBY-1842: -- Unfortunately, I'm not a content expert in these areas. But the descriptions look just fine to me except for a few minor

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-2142) NullPointerException while using XAConnection/PooledConnection in a heavily contended multithreaded scenario

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2142?page=comments#action_12457478 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2142: -- Thanks Asif for the suggested change and detailed analysis. I think you are correct in that it would

[jira] Closed: (DERBY-2097) Requesting a way (API call?) to test an existing embedded XA connection to determine if the connection is idle and available for reuse by the connection pool.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2097?page=all ] Stan Bradbury closed DERBY-2097. Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Can't reproduce this and won't be spending the time needed to define the need generically. Also, as commented on, this may not

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-2109) System privileges

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=comments#action_12457498 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2109: -- I don't think the plugin privilege is a system privilege since (as described in systemPrivs.html) it

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-2109) System privileges

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=comments#action_12457499 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-2109: Hi, Rick, nicely done! Here are my comments: - I like the use of Java security for system privileges - I

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-2129) Tasks related to releasing 10.2.2

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2129?page=comments#action_12457501 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2129: -- The reference guide still has this disclaimer about JDBC 4, should it be removed?

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2109) System privileges

David Van Couvering (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=comments#action_12457499 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-2109: Hi, Rick, nicely done! Here are my comments: - I like the use of Java

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-2129) Tasks related to releasing 10.2.2

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2129?page=comments#action_12457503 ] Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-2129: - Thanks for the catch, Dan. Removed that disclaimer, revision 485927. Any discrepancies will still need to be

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-2109) System privileges

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=comments#action_12457508 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2109: -- Rick thanks for writing this up and looking proposing how to use the Java SecurityManager. I would

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-2109) System privileges

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=comments#action_12457509 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2109: -- Could you add the reasons why Derby will require the doAsPrivileged permission and not just the doAs

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-2109) System privileges

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=comments#action_12457515 ] Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-2109: -- Thanks Dan and David for your quick feedback. I will incorporate your suggestions into the next rev of the spec: 1)

Derby JDBC 4.0 implementation -- any discrepancies with the final?

How close is the Derby JDBC 4.0 implementation to what actually left the stable [1]? I'm not spotting any discrepancies documented in the release notes in Rick's release candidate [2]. If there are any discrepancies, I should undo my deletion of the disclaimer Dan noticed in the reference guide

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2109) System privileges

Rick Hillegas (JIRA) wrote: Dan, could you say something more about how you think we should sand-down the plugin privilege: I did: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200611.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8a) I agree that one of the problems is the ability to invoke code