[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2060?page=comments#action_12457643 ]
Bernt M. Johnsen commented on DERBY-2060:
-
Seems ok to me. +1 to commit.
I don't have a working doc working set for the moment, so if some other
committer
Slightly misleading error message for UNIQUE constraint without NUT NULL
constraint
---
Key: DERBY-2167
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2167
Project:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2167?page=all ]
Bernt M. Johnsen updated DERBY-2167:
Summary: Slightly misleading error message for UNIQUE constraint without
NOT NULL constraint (was: Slightly misleading error message for UNIQUE
Anders Morken [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I'm not an expert on the subject matter, I can't help myself but
chime in and share my thoughts on this... =)
During the course of our project on analyzing Derby's SMP scalability
properties, we've investigated Derby's locking and latching pretty
Suresh Thalamati [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If we are removing Latching out of LockManager for perfromance
reasons, my preference also would be to handle at the page level,
instead of having yet another indirection.
As Mike mentioned , it would be nice to have a VTI that will show the
Olav Sandstaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
[...]
This is impressive, and much higher than what I would have expected by
just moving the latching out of the lock manager.
I would guess that the improvement is mainly caused by
a) Less contention on the lock table
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2144?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-2144:
-
Urgency: Normal (was: Blocker)
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
Adjusting priority and urgency to the usual values.
Meta-data for Container could not
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1471?page=all ]
Tomohito Nakayama updated DERBY-1471:
-
Attachment: DERBY-1471_4.patch
DERBY-1471_4.stat
* Description of the patch
* This patch implements Layer B streaming for new
Hi Jean,
The Derby JDBC 4 drivers conform to the final version of Java SE 6 which
sent out the door yesterday. So, yes, that disclaimer should be scrubbed
from the user guide.
Thanks,
-Rick
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
How close is the Derby JDBC 4.0 implementation to what actually left
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are a couple of things in the implementation of this class that
I just don't understand:
- The doc for the method grow() says:
ASSUMPTIONS: that all extra bits in the last byte are zero. But in
other methods (or() and()...) great care is taken mask out
Julius Stroffek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The key question is whether the statement with error should (or
could) rollback the active transaction?
Does this same situation arise with an embedded configuration? If
Issue Subscription
Filter: Derby: JIRA issues with patch available (12 issues)
Subscriber: derby-dev
Key Summary
DERBY-1471 Implement layer B streaming for new methods defined in JDBC4.0
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1471
DERBY-2060 SET CURRENT ISOLATION in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2083?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner closed DERBY-2083.
Resolution: Fixed
Revision 484672 fixes the backup problem introduced with the first set of
changes.
Shutting down a database loaded from a
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi Jean,
The Derby JDBC 4 drivers conform to the final version of Java SE 6 which
sent out the door yesterday. So, yes, that disclaimer should be scrubbed
from the user guide.
Thanks, Rick,
I also removed the disclaimer from the trunk, revision 486210.
-jean
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2130?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-2130:
---
Attachment: jumpReset.patch
That is, once I saw 500 seconds for the prepare on database 6, but I
reran DB 6 and saw 168 seconds. [...] I don't think that the non-
determinism
can you apply jumpReset.patch to your codeline and run your tests again?
You bet! This sounds like a very interesting theory to pursue.
thanks,
bryan
[Auto-generated mail]
*Daily* 485752/2006-12-11 18:00:25 MET
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
lin
0517517 0 100.29% derbyall
064786478 0 153.43% suitesAll
sol
0
as with most RESOLVES and TODO still in the code, it has been
a long time since anything has happened on them.
FetchDescriptor came about from a profiling/performance pass on the
code. An array was chosen so that no routine and/or math would
be needed to set/clear the info. Int's were chosen
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- A minor nit: This class appears to do a lot of division and
remainder calculations with powers of 2 (frequently 8). Is it not
generally preferably to do this with shifts and bitwise ANDs?
I prefer the approach that leads to code
Mike Matrigali wrote:
The more interesting issue is the general cost of getting to a column,
let me start a separate thread on that.
I just filed a derby issue about the issues with the current row format
and determining offset to a given column. DERBY-2168
Given the test run I would be ok with a class that is obviously
in the business of manipulating bits to do tricks with shift.
Please when changing the code increase the comments around the
shifts and maybe include your reasoning (ie. perf results) so
that someone else doesn't change it because
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Rick Hillegas (JIRA) wrote:
Dan, could you say something more about how you think we should
sand-down the plugin privilege:
I did:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200611.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Dan. I did not see this mail
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2143?page=comments#action_12457884 ]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-2143:
---
iepnegativetests_ES was failing for j9_foundation in 10.2 and trunk because the
master(canon) file
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=comments#action_12457903 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-2109:
--
Dan, here are some responses to your last set of questions yesterday:
1) Why doAsPrivileged() rather than doAs(): The
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2142?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-2142:
-
Urgency: Normal (was: Urgent)
Priority: Major (was: Critical)
Adjusting urgency and priority to the standard levels.
NullPointerException while
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1567?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1567:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: 10.2.1.6)
Unknown release vehicle.
generateClientMessageTest.sh is broken
--
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1517?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1517:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 10.2.2.0)
Unknown release vehicle.
Derby Network Client to handle list of SECMEC(s) returned by
existing/released DRDA Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1458?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1458:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 10.2.2.0)
Unknown release vehicle.
Add MessageBundleTest to build script to verify that there are no orphaned
message ids
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1433?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1433:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 10.2.2.0)
Unknown release vehicle.
Client driver does not handle string literals containing where current of
correctly
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1341:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 10.2.2.0)
Unknown release vehicle.
LOB setBytes method(s) are currently no supported, but part of the Java 1.4
JDBC interface
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-790?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-790:
Fix Version/s: (was: 10.2.2.0)
Unknown release vehicle.
SQLException used by the networked interface to Derby is not serializable
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2125?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-2125:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 10.2.2.0)
Unknown release vehicle.
Getting Started with Derby - Installing Derby
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1650?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1650:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 10.2.2.0)
Unknown release vehicle.
derbytools.jar needs org.apache.derby.iapi.reference.Attribute even though
that class
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1716?page=comments#action_12457926 ]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1716:
---
updated the 10.2 j9_foundation canon with revision 486380.
Revoking select privilege from a user times out
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=comments#action_12457941 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2109:
--
doAsPrivileged() vs. doAs()
Thanks for the link to the JAAS reference, I think a better technical
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Please download and test-drive the 10.2.2.0 candidate, then vote on
whether to accept it as a Derby release.
For posterity I ran a set of ODBC tests against Derby Network Server - 10.2.2.0
- (485682) using the DB2 Runtime Client (v8) and all tests ran as expected.
I
36 matches
Mail list logo
